The main category of All News Articles.
You can use the search box below to find what you need.
[wd_asp id=1]
The main category of All News Articles.
You can use the search box below to find what you need.
[wd_asp id=1]
– Written by
Ben Hughes
STORY LINK Pound Sterling to Dollar Forecast: GBP Firm as Starmer Faces Election Fallout
The Pound to Dollar (GBP/USD) exchange rate held above the 1.3600 level on Friday as Sterling remained relatively resilient despite mounting political pressure on Prime Minister Keir Starmer following heavy Labour losses in the UK local elections.
Currency markets continued to monitor the political fallout after results showed Reform UK and the Green Party making substantial gains at Labour’s expense, increasing speculation over Starmer’s long-term leadership position and the potential implications for UK fiscal policy.
The US Dollar remained generally weaker amid firm global risk appetite and expectations surrounding Friday’s US jobs report.
The Pound secured net gains on Thursday amid a softer dollar tone while investors waited for the full local election results and the potential implications for Starmer’s leadership.
According to Danske Bank; “Gilt markets are sensitive to this outcome, as it could signal a shift towards a more lenient fiscal policy.”
Initial results released overnight confirmed severe Labour losses across England, Scotland and Wales, intensifying questions over Starmer’s authority within the party.
Nick Rees, head of macro research at Monex Europe, warned that markets were still underestimating Sterling risks.
Get better rates and lower fees on your next international money transfer.
Compare TorFX with top UK banks in seconds and see how much you could save.
He stated; “No one wanted to be the leader who would wear the local election loss. That risk is out of the way tomorrow, so regardless of what happens, Starmer’s more vulnerable.”
He added; “Markets haven’t priced that in but they will at some point.”
ING maintained a cautious stance on Sterling and argued that the Pound remained exposed to further political fallout following Labour’s weak performance.
Pressure on Starmer intensified after Labour suffered one of its worst local election performances in decades, with growing criticism from within the party and renewed speculation over possible leadership challengers.
Reuters reported that more than 20 Labour MPs had privately or publicly raised concerns over Starmer’s future following the results.
Markets remain particularly sensitive to the possibility that Labour could respond to the election setback with a looser fiscal stance or a shift towards more left-leaning policies.
According to ING; “The pound and gilts are currently embedding no visible political risk premium.”
The bank warned there remained scope for Sterling weakness if investors became more concerned over fiscal sustainability and political instability.
Dollar Held Back by Firm Risk Appetite
As far as geo-politics are concerned, Iran stated that it was reviewing a US peace proposal that sources indicated would formally end the war but leave unresolved key US demands that Iran suspend its nuclear programme and reopen the Strait of Hormuz.
MUFG commented; “Overall, the latest developments add to investor confidence that the US and Iran continue to make progress to find a diplomatic solution to end the conflict and re-open the Strait.”
It added; “The improvement in global investor risk sentiment and drop in energy prices is providing a tailwind for emerging market currency performance.”
RBC Capital Markets head of global commodity strategy Helima Croft injected a note of caution.
According to Croft; “It remains far from clear that there is any material movement toward reopening the Strait, or if we are instead stuck in a rebranded ‘ceasefire with no oil’ purgatory.”
The dollar index traded near 97.85 as the US currency continued to track broader market sentiment.
ING noted that recent dollar moves remained closely correlated with equity markets.
It added; “Any major further leg lower in the USD still requires a strong equity session, regardless of oil moves.”
According to the bank; “The strength in risk assets and more balanced positioning suggest that DXY can easily fall back below the 97.50 pre-war levels, even if oil prices settle significantly above February levels.”
International Money Transfer? Ask our resident FX expert a money transfer question or try John’s new, free, no-obligation personal service! ,where he helps every step of the way,
ensuring you get the best exchange rates on your currency requirements.
TAGS: Pound Dollar Forecasts
Brent crude oil price ended the week lower as investors anticipated an Iranian response to US proposals to end the ten-week war. It dropped to $100, down sharply from this month’s high of over $115 a barrel. Other global benchmarks like the West Texas Intermediate (WTI) and Russian urals have also retreated.
Iran is in no hurry to reach a deal
Brent crude oil price retreated after media reports suggested that a deal between Iran and the United States was imminent. Axios was the first major news organization to report this. In his report, Barack Ravid said that the two sides were working on a one-page document that would reopen the Strait of Hormuz.
The United States sent Iran a proposal on this deal late last week. In a press gaggle on Friday, Trump said that the US was waiting for Iranian’s proposal “tonight.” At press time, Iran was yet to submit the proposal, a sign that officials are not in a hurry.
Analysts believe that divisions between the US and Iran are extremely wide and hard to bridge. For one, the US will want Iran to hand it over the highly enriched uranium, which Trump will use to tout his success. Iran has largely ruled that out.
On the other hand, Iran will want an end to sanctions and the release of billions of dollars held in foreign accounts. Such a move will be risky for Trump, who has accused President Obama of shipping billions of dollars to Iran after the signing of the Iran nuclear deal.
Therefore, there is still a risk that the ongoing crisis will continue for longer than Trump expects. Such a move would lead to higher crude oil prices for longer.
In addition to the closure of the Hormuz Strait, the reality is that oil inventories are falling in some key countries. Data shows that global oil inventories fell by about 4.8 million barrels a day between March and late April.
Analysts believe that the oil supply shock will worsen even when the war ends because of the declining inventories. In a warning statement last week, Jeff Currie, a top analyst at Carlyle Group, said that US oil storage tanks may run empty around July 4th this year.
Looking ahead, signs of a potential deal between the US and Iran will be bearish for oil prices. Signs of an escalation, on the other hand, will lead to a reversal.
A key wildcard will be Donald Trump’s trip to China, where he will ask Beijing to press Iran to reopen the Strait of Hormuz. While the closure is affecting Beijing, chances are that Xi will not be interested in helping the US.
Brent crude oil price is sending mixed signals
Crude oil price chart | Source: TradingView
The daily chart reveals that Brent has come under pressure in the past few days. It has pulled back from $116 earlier this month to the current $100.
A closer look shows that it may have formed a double-top pattern whose neckline is at $85. However, one can also argue that it has formed an inverted head-and-shoulders pattern and is now in the right shoulder.
Therefore, this week will be crucial as traders wait for the outcome of the ongoing talks. The most likely scenario is where the inverted H&S pattern activates and retests the key resistance at $115. A drop below the support at $96 will invalidate the bearish outlook.
The article covers the following subjects:
Consider long positions from corrections above 87.20 with a target of 115.70–126.00.
Breakout and consolidation below 87.20 will allow the asset to continue declining to the levels of 78.70–65.00.
A descending correction appears to have formed as the second wave of larger degree (2) on the weekly chart, with wave C of (2) completed as its part. On the daily time frame, an ascending third wave (3) has started unfolding, with the first wave of smaller degree 1 of (3) still developing as its part. Apparently, wave v of 1 is developing on the H4 time frame, with a local correction (ii) of v formed as its part. If the presumption is correct, WTI will continue to rise to 115.70–126.00 within wave (iii) of v. The level of 87.20 is critical in this scenario as a breakout below it will enable the asset to continue declining to the levels of 78.70–65.00.
This forecast is based on the Elliott Wave Theory. When developing trading strategies, it is essential to consider fundamental factors, as the market situation can change at any time.
The content of this article reflects the author’s opinion and does not necessarily reflect the official position of LiteFinance broker. The material published on this page is provided for informational purposes only and should not be considered as the provision of investment advice for the purposes of Directive 2014/65/EU.
According to copyright law, this article is considered intellectual property, which includes a prohibition on copying and distributing it without consent.
The GBPJPY pair settles in sideways range near 212.80 level, affected by the contradiction of the main indicators, to delay activating the previously suggested negative trend.
The price might recover more of the losses by its rally towards 213.50, reaching the moving average 55 near 213.85, but it will not affect the main bearish scenario, depending on the continuation of forming main barrier at 214.30 level against the current trading, note that breaking 211.80 level will ease the mission of forming strong waves, to expect reaching 211.20, repeating the pressure on 210.45 support.
The expected trading range for today is between 211.80 and 213.50
Trend forecast :fluctuated
NEW YORK, May 9, 2026, 05:42 EDT
Natural gas futures in the U.S. wrapped up the week just under $2.80 per million British thermal units. Prices held their ground on a lighter storage build, though a decisive move higher remained elusive with spring demand lagging. As of May 8, Trading Economics showed natural gas at $2.80, marking a monthly gain of roughly 5%, but the contract is still off more than 26% compared to the same period last year.
The timing lands in the shoulder season—the lull between heavy winter heating and the onset of summer air-conditioning demand. During this stretch, traders pay close attention to storage levels, export activity, and weather forecasts, since day-to-day demand can shift abruptly.
Underground gas storage in the U.S. reached 2,205 bcf for the week ending May 1, according to the Energy Information Administration. That’s a 63 bcf build from the previous week. Inventories now stand 75 bcf higher than this time last year and 139 bcf above the five-year average. While supplies remain comfortable, traders had been looking for a touch more slack.
The reported 63 bcf injection missed forecasts for a 74 bcf build and trailed the five-year average gain of 77 bcf, StoneX noted after the data hit. While a smaller build isn’t a sign of scarcity, it does chip away at just how persistent the surplus appears.
Gelber & Associates pointed to “a rapidly fading heating season” bumping up against the first notable summer cooling demand, with pipeline exports to Mexico approaching 7.5 bcf/d lending a floor. NatGasWeather.com noted that extended forecasts now tilt hotter-than-normal for much of the interior U.S. heading into late May and early June. The Wall Street Journal
Supply remains steady. U.S. drillers bumped up oil and gas rigs for the third week running, bringing the count to 548, according to Baker Hughes. Gas rigs ticked down by one to 129. The EIA projects U.S. gas production will edge up to 109.6 bcf/d in 2026, compared with a record 107.7 bcf/d seen in 2025, Reuters said.
For now, the EIA’s outlook is muted, not wild. The agency projects Henry Hub—the main U.S. benchmark out of Louisiana—hovering near $3.10 per MMBtu for both Q2 and Q3. By 2026, it expects a yearly average of $3.67. On the export front, U.S. liquefied natural gas shipments are set to reach 17.0 bcf/d in 2026, topping the prior year’s record 15.1 bcf/d.
U.S. gas finds an extra lift from global markets. Asia’s spot LNG prices slipped to $16.90 per MMBtu for June, down from $17.80, according to Reuters, but that’s still a hefty premium over Henry Hub. ICIS analyst Evan Tan pointed to “current spot prices have started to ease off” as traders watch for a potential U.S.-Iran agreement and sluggish buying in North Asia. Yet Hans Van Cleef at EqoLibrium said the firmer Asian market means “all uncontracted cargoes are heading to Asia.” Reuters
Bulls could see their case unravel in a hurry. A cool-down after late May, ongoing LNG maintenance that’s still limiting export demand, or bigger builds in the upcoming storage reports—any of these could send the market slipping into that softer spring mood again. With inventories running above average, sellers aren’t shy about hitting into any rally.
Looking ahead, range-bound action seems most likely, though there’s a slight tilt higher if weekend weather models keep the heat. Edging up to $3? That’ll require a clear boost in power burn or LNG feedgas running hotter. Otherwise, Thursday’s storage surprise offers a floor, not fresh direction.
London, May 9, 2026, 10:40 (BST)
Oil prices managed a bounce on Friday but still wrapped up the week in the red, with traders eyeing U.S.-Iran diplomacy more than the usual supply reports as violence flares near the Strait of Hormuz. Brent crude, the international standard, settled at $101.29 a barrel, while U.S. West Texas Intermediate closed at $95.42. Both benchmarks slid over 6% for the week. “The market is hung between a breakthrough in negotiations and a renewal of the fighting,” said John Kilduff, partner at Again Capital. Reuters
The market’s not just moving with the usual supply swings anymore. China’s crude imports tumbled 20% in April, sliding to 38.5 million metric tons—the lowest mark since July 2022—after the Hormuz shutdown tightened flows to the top oil buyer, according to customs figures.
Bulls got a bit of a lift from fresh U.S. weekly figures, yet the war premium stuck around. The Energy Information Administration reported commercial crude stocks, not counting the Strategic Petroleum Reserve, dropped 2.3 million barrels to 457.2 million for the week ended May 1. Gasoline and distillate inventories also moved lower.
Citi didn’t budge on its short-term Brent call, holding the zero-to-three-month target at $120 a barrel. The bank projects the benchmark will average $110 through the second quarter, sliding to $95 in the third and $80 in the fourth. According to Citi, the market may be shrugging off how persistent or severe the disruption could be, warning traders are “under-pricing duration and tail risks.” Reuters
The U.S. government isn’t calling for fireworks, but there’s a catch baked in. According to the EIA’s April outlook, Brent tops out at $115 a barrel in Q2, then slides under $90 in Q4. All of it hinges, though, on how long the Middle East conflict drags on and how much supply actually goes offline.
OPEC+ is making a point to the market: it has the power to boost supply, even if those promised extra barrels won’t hit the market right away. The group signed off on a 188,000-barrel-per-day quota hike for June, but analysts caution the real-world impact looks minor as Gulf exports are still tight. “Physical supply remains very limited,” said Jorge Leon, an analyst at Rystad and former OPEC official. OPEC+, he added, wants to remind everyone it “still calls the shots.” Reuters
Signals out of U.S. shale remain conflicted. Baker Hughes reported a third consecutive weekly increase in oil and gas rigs, ticking up by one to 548—the highest since early April. Even so, that’s 30 fewer rigs than this time last year, highlighting that rising prices aren’t translating into immediate production gains.
Big swings in risk are turning up in corporate hedging moves. Diamondback Energy has snapped up close to $70 million in options riding on the WTI-Brent spread—the difference between U.S. crude and international oil prices—in a bet that stands to gain if U.S. oil exports face curbs and domestic crude drops. Tim Skirrow, who heads derivatives at Energy Aspects, called the deal a sign of “risk of a U.S. crude export ban.” Reuters
On the demand front, the International Energy Agency in April projected that oil demand would shrink by 80,000 barrels per day this year as the Iran war reshaped its view. The agency cautioned that if tight supplies and elevated prices stick around, “demand destruction will spread.” IEA
Still, the risk runs both ways. A lasting ceasefire, tankers once again flowing smoothly through Hormuz, tepid Chinese demand, and draws from the U.S. Strategic Petroleum Reserve could all keep a lid on prices. But if negotiations break down and shipping snarls persist, Brent hovering close to $100 might end up being less a barrier and more a launchpad.
This week, oil prices look set to move on headlines rather than the usual inventory calculus. Brent’s underpinned by stubbornly tight physical supply and thinning product stocks. WTI, though, gets dragged by added uncertainty over U.S. export policy. The market’s got a bit of relief in the mix. Patience? Not much of that priced in.
EUR/USD gained ground despite the disappointing Industrial Production report from Germany. The report showed that Industrial Production decreased by -0.7% month-over-month in March, compared to analyst forecast of +0.5%.
Germany’s Exports increased by +0.5% month-over-month in March, while analysts expected that they would decline by -1.7%. The better-than-expected Exports report from Germany provided additional support to the European currency.
A successful test of the resistance at 1.1765 – 1.1780 will push EUR/USD towards the resistance level at 1.1850 – 1.1865. RSI remains in the moderate territory, so there is plenty of room to gain momentum in case the right catalysts emerge.
The EURJPY pair reached %23.6 Fibonacci correction level at 182.00, to form strong support to provide chances for recovering some losses by its rally near 183.70 level.
In general, the bearish scenario will remain valid depending on forming main barrier by 185.45 level against the current trading, which makes us wait for gathering negative momentum, which allows it to renew the negative attempts that might target 182.80 level, to attempt to renew the pressure on 182.00 support, while breaching the main barrier and holding above it will confirm its move to a positive station, to begin targeting several positive stations by its rally towards 186.00 and 186.60.
The expected trading range for today is between 182.80 and 184.30
Trend forecast: Bearish
The article covers the following subjects:
Consider long positions from corrections above 1.1676 with a target of 1.2088–1.2400.
Breakout and consolidation below 1.1676 will allow the pair to continue declining to the levels of 1.1400–1.1185.
On the weekly time frame, an ascending wave of larger degree B is developing, with wave (A) of B forming as its part. On the daily time frame, the third wave 3 of (A) is apparently unfolding. Within it, wave i of 3 has formed, corrective wave ii of 3 has been completed, and wave iii of 3 has started developing. On the H4 time frame, the first wave of smaller degree (i) of iii continues to unfold. Within it, a local correction iv of (i) has been completed and wave v of (i) is developing. If the presumption is correct, EUR/USD will continue to rise to 1.2088–1.2400. The level of 1.1676 is critical in this scenario. A breakout below it will allow the pair to continue falling to the levels of 1.1400–1.1185.
This forecast is based on the Elliott Wave Theory. When developing trading strategies, it is essential to consider fundamental factors, as the market situation can change at any time.
The content of this article reflects the author’s opinion and does not necessarily reflect the official position of LiteFinance broker. The material published on this page is provided for informational purposes only and should not be considered as the provision of investment advice for the purposes of Directive 2014/65/EU.
According to copyright law, this article is considered intellectual property, which includes a prohibition on copying and distributing it without consent.