Oil prices are limping into the final weeks of 2025 with Brent crude hovering just above $60 a barrel and traders fixated on one word: oversupply. As of Friday, December 12, Brent settled at about $61.12 per barrel and WTI at $57.44, both benchmarks down more than 4% for the week and sitting near their lowest levels in several years. ^[1]

At the same time, big agencies and Wall Street banks are rolling out fresh forecasts that increasingly point to sub‑$60 oil in 2026, even as OPEC insists the market will be roughly balanced next year. ^[2]

This article pulls together the latest December 2025 data, forecasts and analysis to sketch out a near‑term oil price forecast for December 2025, and what it might mean for 2026.

Where oil prices stand in mid‑December 2025

• Spot prices:
  • Brent crude closed around $61.12 per barrel on December 12. ^[3]
  • WTI settled near $57.44 per barrel the same day. ^[4]
• Year‑to‑date performance:
  Brent has fallen roughly 18% in 2025 so far, while WTI is down close to 20%, as the market has steadily priced out the war‑driven risk premium of the early 2020s and refocused on swelling supply. ^[5]
• Price levels vs recent history:
  The International Energy Agency (IEA) notes that North Sea Dated crude (a physical benchmark related to Brent) averaged about $63.63 per barrel in November, its fifth monthly decline in a row and the longest losing streak in over a decade — effectively putting prices near four‑year lows. ^[6]

In short, December 2025 oil prices are weak, but not collapsing: Brent is holding around the low $60s, yet sentiment is sharply bearish because of what’s happening in supply, demand and inventories.

Why the market has turned bearish going into December

1. A supply surge colliding with only modest demand growth

The IEA’s December 2025 Oil Market Report paints a clear picture:

• Global oil demand is expected to rise by about 830,000 barrels per day (bpd) in 2025 and 860,000 bpd in 2026. ^[7]
• But global oil supply is set to grow much faster – roughly 3 million bpd in 2025 and another 2.4 million bpd in 2026, driven heavily by non‑OPEC+ producers like the U.S., Brazil and Guyana. ^[8]

That imbalance is now showing up in stockpiles:

• Observed global oil inventories hit around 8.03 billion barrels in October, the highest in four years, with stock builds averaging 1.2 million bpd in the first ten months of 2025. ^[9]
• The IEA estimates the implied surplus at nearly 3.7 million bpd on average from Q4 2025 through 2026 – an unusually large overhang for this stage of the cycle. ^[10]

That’s why recent IEA forecasts of a glut have become one of the main downward forces on prices this month.

2. “Oil on water” and the emerging “super glut” narrative

A big part of the story is where the barrels are sitting. The IEA highlights a surge in oil on water — crude in transit or temporarily floating — as sanctioned barrels struggle to find buyers and long‑haul shipments from the Americas to Asia jump. ^[11]

Private‑sector and media analysis has picked this up and sharpened it:

• A widely discussed Financial Times piece cites Trafigura’s chief economist warning of a coming “super glut” in 2026 as new supply projects ramp up while demand growth softens. He points to new output from Brazil and Guyana, cooling Chinese demand (partly due to EV adoption), and resilient U.S. supply. ^[12]
• A detailed WRAL/FinancialContent analysis similarly describes a “super glut” in crude, with non‑OPEC+ supply from the U.S., Brazil, Canada and Guyana consistently outpacing demand, while EV adoption and industrial slowdowns cap consumption. ^[13]

Taken together, the narrative going into December is clear: there is simply too much oil around, and it’s increasingly visible in both inventories and shipping data.

3. Agencies now see lower average prices ahead

The latest U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Short‑Term Energy Outlook, released on December 9, 2025, explicitly bakes falling prices into its forecast: ^[14]

• The EIA expects global oil inventories to keep rising through 2026, putting continuing downward pressure on prices.
• It projects Brent crude averaging about $69 per barrel in 2025, then dropping steeply to around $55 per barrel in 2026, staying near that level all year.
• In a related “Today in Energy” note, the EIA forecasts WTI crude at an average of $65 in 2025 and $51 in 2026. ^[15]

Those numbers don’t give a precise December 2025 point forecast, but they send a strong signal: in the EIA’s baseline, the path of least resistance for prices is lower from here, not higher.

4. Demand is not collapsing – but it isn’t strong enough

It’s important to note that demand itself is not in freefall. The IEA has actually revised its 2025 and 2026 demand growth estimates up slightly, helped by a brighter macro outlook and a weaker U.S. dollar. It now expects:

• Demand growth of 830,000 bpd in 2025 and 860,000 bpd in 2026, higher than its November outlook. ^[16]

Cheaper crude and a softer dollar typically support consumption, especially in emerging markets. But when supply growth is running more than double demand growth, as 2025’s numbers suggest, the demand side simply can’t absorb all the new barrels.

IEA vs OPEC vs Wall Street: diverging 2026 oil price outlooks

Even as the market leans bearish, there is no unified view on just how oversupplied 2026 will be — and that’s crucial context for any December 2025 oil price forecast.

IEA: glut of nearly 4% of global demand

The IEA’s December update trimmed its 2026 surplus estimate for the first time since May, but it still expects global supply to exceed demand by about 3.84 million bpd in 2026, close to 4% of world consumption. ^[17]

This forecast, heavily publicised in recent days, has weighed on prices throughout December by reinforcing expectations of:

• Rising inventories well into 2026
• A structural shift toward lower average prices unless supply is cut

OPEC: no glut, just balance

OPEC strongly disputes the idea of a huge oversupply:

• In its latest monthly report, the group says OPEC+ produced 43.06 million bpd in November.
• It forecasts demand for OPEC+ crude will average 43.0 million bpd in 2026, almost exactly matching current production. ^[18]
• If the group kept output at November levels, OPEC data imply a surplus of just 60,000 bpd — essentially balanced, and nowhere near the IEA’s multi‑million‑barrel excess. ^[19]

OPEC+ has also said it will pause further production increases in the first quarter of 2026, citing widespread predictions of oversupply and signalling that it is prepared to defend prices if needed. ^[20]

Wall Street and investment banks: low 60s — or even lower

Banks and market surveys sit somewhere between these two poles – but skewing bearish:

• A Reuters poll of 35 economists and analysts, published November 28, projects Brent averaging about $62.23/bbl in 2026 and WTI around $59/bbl, with “swelling supplies” expected to keep prices under pressure. ^[21]
• Goldman Sachs recently forecast Brent at $56 and WTI at $52 in 2026, warning of a roughly 2 million bpd surplus and even flagging the risk of a temporary dip into the $40s if non‑OPEC supply proves particularly resilient or the global economy slows sharply. ^[22]
• Morgan Stanley, by contrast, nudged its view slightly higher, lifting its H1 2026 Brent forecast from $57.50 to $60 on the back of OPEC+ pausing quota hikes and tighter sanctions on Russian exports. ^[23]
• A recent OilPrice.com roundup notes that “most investment banks and the EIA” now expect average oil prices below $60 in 2026, reflecting the broad consensus around persistent oversupply. ^[24]

In other words, the centre of gravity for 2026 forecasts has shifted into the high‑50s to low‑60s range for Brent, with significant disagreement about how quickly, and from what level, prices will get there.

Oil price forecast for December 2025: what happens next?

Major agencies don’t typically publish a day‑by‑day December 2025 oil price forecast, but combining their latest projections with current market behaviour allows us to sketch plausible trading ranges and scenarios for the remainder of the month.

What the market is currently signalling

Recent weekly coverage shows a market that reacts more to glut headlines than to geopolitical risk:

• On December 12, Brent and WTI both ended the week down more than 4% despite a U.S. seizure of a Venezuelan crude tanker and ongoing Ukraine‑related disruptions — a clear sign that traders view oversupply and potential Russia‑Ukraine peace talks as more important than isolated supply shocks right now. ^[25]
• A December 13 week‑ahead outlook notes that rallies triggered by tanker seizures or refinery strikes faded quickly as investors refocused on abundant supply, rising product inventories and a looming 2026 surplus. TechStock²

Against that backdrop, here’s a scenario‑based December 2025 oil price outlook centred on Brent, with WTI typically trading a few dollars lower.

Important note: The ranges below are analytical scenarios, not guarantees, and are based on current information as of mid‑December 2025. They are not investment advice.

Base case: “slow grind lower”

Probability: High | Indicative range (rest of December): Brent ~$60–65, WTI ~$56–61

In this scenario, the narrative that has dominated early December continues:

• Weekly data show modest crude draws but big builds in gasoline and diesel, reinforcing the idea that refiners are well‑supplied and end‑user demand is patchy. TechStock²
• No major new OPEC+ cuts are announced before year‑end, and the group sticks to its plan to pause further hikes from Q1 2026 rather than actively tightening now. ^[26]
• Markets keep trading the “2026 glut” story anchored in the IEA’s roughly 3.8–3.9 million bpd surplus forecast, only mildly offset by OPEC’s more balanced view. ^[27]

In this base case, December 2025 looks like a transition month:

• Brent likely oscillates around the low $60s, with frequent tests of $60 and occasional bounces toward the mid‑$60s when geopolitics flare up.
• WTI tends to track a few dollars below, consistent with EIA’s longer‑term expectation of a discount to Brent and a 2026 average near $51. ^[28]

Bearish case: “early taste of sub‑$60 Brent”

Probability: Moderate | Indicative range: Brent ~$55–60, WTI ~$51–57

Here, the glut narrative intensifies just as liquidity thins into year‑end:

• Weekly EIA data show continued builds in product inventories and perhaps a renewed build in crude stocks, sending a signal that demand is not keeping up with supply even at current prices. TechStock²+1
• Macro data out of China or Europe disappoint, reviving concerns about trade and manufacturing and dampening expectations for fuel demand heading into 2026. ^[29]
• Traders increasingly position for the kind of “super glut” flagged by Trafigura and others, with some analysts explicitly calling for Brent to drop below $60 by the turn of the year and into the mid‑$50s in early 2026. ^[30]

Under these conditions, it would not be surprising to see:

• Short‑lived breaks below $60 for Brent in late December
• WTI probing into the low‑to‑mid $50s, closer to where EIA and some banks see its 2026 average

The main factor that could limit the downside in this scenario is the growing concern that WTI in the $50–60 range is at or below breakeven for many new U.S. shale wells, which could eventually choke off supply growth. ^[31]

Bullish (but unlikely) case: “geopolitics and demand surprise the market”

Probability: Lower | Indicative range: Brent ~$65–72, WTI ~$61–68

For a meaningful rally this month, several things would probably have to line up at once:

• Geopolitical risk finally translates into sustained supply losses – for example, a broader disruption to Venezuelan exports after the recent tanker seizure, or a more serious hit to Russian export infrastructure. ^[32]
• Russian and Venezuelan exports fall more sharply than currently priced in, rather than just being rerouted or delayed. ^[33]
• Short‑term demand indicators, especially from Asia, surprise on the upside, and U.S. economic data remain resilient enough to calm fears of a 2026 slowdown. ^[34]

Even then, the substantial 2026 surplus projected by the IEA and the sub‑$60 averages envisioned by many banks suggest that any December rally would likely face heavy selling into the high $60s–low $70s, as traders view it as an opportunity to re‑establish shorts or hedge. ^[35]

What lower December prices mean for consumers and producers

Consumers: cheaper fuel now, more relief next year

Lower crude prices are already filtering through to refined products:

• The EIA projects U.S. gasoline prices averaging about $3.11 per gallon in 2025 and $3.00 in 2026, with declining crude costs the main driver. ^[36]
• WRAL/FinancialContent analysis goes further, suggesting U.S. retail gasoline could drop toward $2.90 per gallon in 2026, a post‑pandemic low, if Brent settles in the mid‑$50s. ^[37]

For households and fuel‑intensive businesses, a December spent in the low‑$60s for Brent solidifies expectations of relief at the pump in 2026.

Producers: margins squeezed, strategy under pressure

For producers, the December trend is far more uncomfortable:

• Lower crude prices directly compress upstream margins, especially for high‑cost projects and for shale producers reliant on rapid reinvestment.
• Analysis based on Reuters and OilPrice.com suggests that WTI in the $50–60 band is already close to or below the breakeven for many new Permian wells, raising the risk that capital spending and supply growth slow if prices stay there. ^[38]
• Integrated majors with large refining and petrochemical operations can partially offset weaker upstream earnings with better downstream margins, thanks to cheaper feedstock. ^[39]

If December closes near current levels, it will reinforce the idea that 2024–2025’s high‑price era is over, and that oil companies must compete in a lower‑price, transition‑driven environment.

Key data and events to watch for the rest of December 2025

Several near‑term catalysts could still sway oil prices before year‑end:

1. EIA Weekly Petroleum Status Report – December 17
   • A sharper‑than‑expected crude and product draw could spark a short‑covering rally from the low $60s for Brent.
   • Another week of large gasoline/diesel builds would reinforce the oversupply narrative and increase the odds of a sub‑$60 test. TechStock²+1
2. Russia‑Ukraine diplomacy and sanctions headlines
   • Markets have recently reacted more strongly to peace‑deal rumours (bearish for prices) than to reports of strikes on energy infrastructure (bullish but short‑lived), a pattern that could continue into late December. TechStock²+2Reuters+2
3. Venezuela export and tanker developments
   • The U.S. seizure of a Venezuelan crude tanker and talk of broader enforcement have raised the risk of localized heavy‑crude tightness, but the market has largely shrugged it off so far. That could change if more ships are intercepted or exports fall more sharply than expected. ^[40]
4. China and global macro data
   • Industrial production, retail sales and trade numbers from China, along with delayed U.S. economic data, will shape expectations for early‑2026 oil demand — and thus for how aggressively traders price in the IEA’s glut. ^[41]

Bottom line: December 2025 is the “bridge month” into a cheaper‑oil era

Pulling all of this together, the most reasonable oil price forecast for December 2025 is:

• Brent crude likely spending most of the month in a $60–65 per barrel band, with elevated risk of a temporary dip below $60 if inventory data and macro news lean bearish.
• WTI likely trading a few dollars below Brent in a $56–61 per barrel range, with a similar downside risk toward the low‑to‑mid $50s.

The balance of evidence from the IEA, EIA, OPEC, Wall Street banks and independent analysts points toward lower average prices in 2026, with many forecasts clustering around mid‑$50s to low‑$60s for Brent and a somewhat cheaper WTI benchmark. ^[42]

That makes December 2025 less about spectacular price moves and more about setting the baseline for a new phase in the oil market — one defined less by scarcity and more by abundance, rising inventories and the growing weight of the energy transition.

Disclaimer: This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute investment, trading, or financial advice. Oil markets are volatile, and prices can move sharply on new information.

References

1. www.reuters.com, 2. www.eia.gov, 3. www.reuters.com, 4. www.reuters.com, 5. tradingeconomics.com, 6. www.iea.org, 7. www.iea.org, 8. www.iea.org, 9. www.iea.org, 10. www.iea.org, 11. www.iea.org, 12. www.ft.com, 13. markets.financialcontent.com, 14. www.eia.gov, 15. www.eia.gov, 16. www.reuters.com, 17. www.reuters.com, 18. www.reuters.com, 19. www.reuters.com, 20. www.reuters.com, 21. www.reuters.com, 22. www.reuters.com, 23. www.reuters.com, 24. oilprice.com, 25. www.reuters.com, 26. www.reuters.com, 27. www.reuters.com, 28. www.eia.gov, 29. www.iea.org, 30. www.ft.com, 31. oilprice.com, 32. www.reuters.com, 33. www.iea.org, 34. www.iea.org, 35. www.eia.gov, 36. www.eia.gov, 37. markets.financialcontent.com, 38. www.reuters.com, 39. markets.financialcontent.com, 40. www.reuters.com, 41. www.reuters.com, 42. www.eia.gov

Are milder forecasts reducing winter heating demand expectations?

Yes. Atmospheric G2 projects widespread warmth across the western, central, and southern U.S. between December 17–26. That shift has quickly unwound last week’s rally to a nearly three-year high. Lower-48 gas demand on Friday was estimated at 110.6 bcf/day, down 3.4% year-over-year, showing the direct impact of weaker weather-driven consumption.

Is production strength reinforcing bearish sentiment?

Strongly. U.S. dry gas production hit 112.5 bcf/day on Friday, up 7.1% from a year ago, according to BNEF. The EIA also raised its 2025 production forecast to 107.74 bcf/day. While the active rig count slipped by 2 to 127, it remains just below a 2.25-year high. Robust supply in the face of weak demand continues to pressure prices lower.

Can a bullish storage draw offer near-term price support?

Limited. The EIA reported a -177 bcf draw for the week ending December 5—larger than both consensus and the five-year average—but inventories remain 2.8% above seasonal norms and flat year-over-year. European storage sits at 71% capacity, well below its five-year average of 81%, but LNG flows to U.S. terminals fell 3% week-over-week to 18.1 bcf/day.

Short-Term Outlook: Is further downside likely?

Bearish. With warmer forecasts extending through late December and long liquidation still in play, sellers remain in control. While some technical indicators may be signaling oversold conditions—raising the risk of a short-covering rally—any bounce must be evaluated carefully.

Traders need to distinguish between technical retracements and rallies tied to a meaningful bullish shift in the weather outlook. Continued guessing will be punished, as fundamentals will ultimately prevail. Unless forecasts turn colder or prices find firm support near $3.913, the downside bias remains intact.

More Information in our Economic Calendar.

Rising Yields Complicate the Gold Setup

The most notable development last week was the move in U.S. Treasurys. The 10-year yield rallied to 4.186%, its highest level since September 2025, closing up 0.047 on the week.

That rise would typically act as a headwind for bullion, and it likely contributed to gold pausing just below last week’s peak. Traders noted that the Fed’s divided vote on its third consecutive rate cut raised questions about the pace of easing in 2026, and the market responded by pushing yields higher rather than lower.

With the 10-year sitting just off multi-month highs, any further firming this week could temporarily slow gold’s upside attempts.

Dollar Weakness Remains a Supportive Offset

Despite the rise in yields, the U.S. dollar moved in the opposite direction, slipping to multi-month lows and offering consistent support for gold. The disconnect between stronger yields and a weaker dollar gave traders a unique setup: gold faced pressure from the bond market but continued to attract demand from overseas buyers taking advantage of favorable currency conditions.

As long as the dollar stays soft, gold retains a tailwind even in the face of elevated Treasury yields.

Jobs and CPI Data Take Center Stage

This week’s data will shape how traders interpret the Fed’s next steps. Payrolls are expected to show flat hiring in October and a modest 50,000 increase in November, with unemployment edging up to 4.5%.

Silver prices surged above $60 and hit a record $64.64 this week, powered by Fed cuts, a global supply squeeze, and booming industrial demand. Here’s the latest news, key drivers, and a 2026 forecast outlook for silver (XAG/USD).

Published: Dec. 14, 2025

Silver just delivered one of the most dramatic weeks in modern precious-metals trading: a clean break above $60/oz, a sprint to fresh all-time highs near $64–$65, and then a sharp, late-week pullback as traders took profits into the weekend.

From December 8 to December 14, 2025, the story of silver prices has been equal parts macro (a Federal Reserve rate cut and a softer U.S. dollar), micro (tight physical availability and inventory shifts), and structural (multi‑year supply deficits colliding with relentless industrial demand—from solar and EVs to the accelerating build-out of AI infrastructure). ^[1]

Below is a detailed recap of the week’s key developments, the most-cited forecasts and analyst views published in the Dec. 8–14 window, and the price levels investors are watching next.

Silver price recap: the key moments from Dec. 8–14, 2025

Monday, Dec. 8: Silver started the week softer as markets waited for the Fed. Spot silver was reported around $57.98/oz, after having hit $59.32 the prior Friday. ^[2]

Tuesday, Dec. 9: The psychological barrier broke. Spot silver jumped above $60 and printed a new all-time high around $60.74/oz, with Reuters citing “supply constraints” and strong multi‑year demand expectations. ^[3]

Wednesday, Dec. 10: After the Fed’s decision, the rally extended. Reuters reported silver hitting a new record near $61.85/oz, with prices up roughly 113% year-to-date at that point and supported by industrial demand, falling inventories, and silver’s U.S. “critical mineral” designation. ^[4]

Thursday, Dec. 11: Momentum accelerated. Reuters reported spot silver up near $64.22/oz, hovering close to a record high around $64.31/oz, as the U.S. dollar weakened and investors digested the Fed’s cut and outlook. ^[5]

Friday, Dec. 12: A blow-off top — and a reality check. Reuters reported silver hitting an all-time high of $64.64/oz, then falling nearly 3% to about $61.7/oz as profit-taking set in. Reuters also noted silver was up nearly 5% on the week and up about 112% in 2025. ^[6]

Weekend, Dec. 13–14: With major markets closed, analysis shifted to sustainability and local-market spillovers. In India, The Economic Times reported MCX silver futures crossed Rs 2,00,000, with the March contract touching Rs 2,01,615 on Dec. 12, before a correction—underscoring how global dollar moves and domestic currency dynamics can amplify volatility. ^[7]

For a futures-market snapshot, Investing.com’s silver futures historical data shows a sharp climb into the week’s peak and a lower close into Friday (Dec. 12). ^[8]

Why silver surged: the 4 drivers behind the $60 breakout

1) The Fed cut rates — and the U.S. dollar weakened

The week’s biggest macro catalyst was the Federal Reserve’s quarter‑point rate cut and the market’s attempt to interpret what comes next.

Reuters coverage across the week emphasized that lower rates tend to favor non‑yielding precious metals, and that the U.S. dollar’s decline helped support silver’s rally as the metal became cheaper for non‑U.S. buyers. ^[9]

But the tone wasn’t purely “dovish.” Reuters also highlighted policy uncertainty and internal division, a reminder that silver can react violently if rate expectations reprice. ^[10]

Why it matters for silver: Unlike gold, silver is both a monetary and an industrial asset. When easing financial conditions coincide with strong manufacturing and electrification demand, silver often behaves like a “high-beta” precious metal—moving more than gold in both directions. ^[11]

2) A tightening physical market — plus tariff uncertainty moving metal around the world

A critical theme running through Dec. 8–14 commentary: the physical market looks tight, even when headline inventories appear large.

• The Financial Times pointed to an ongoing multi‑year supply deficit and described how tariff fears and policy uncertainty have helped pull inventory toward the U.S., while some regions—notably China—still show signs of shortage despite ample Comex stocks. ^[12]
• ING’s Dec. 8 analysis argued tariff uncertainty has driven metal from London to the U.S., contributing to an unusually persistent dislocation between Comex futures and London prices and elevating “lease rates” (borrowing costs). ING also noted Shanghai Futures Exchange-linked inventories fell to their lowest levels in nearly a decade, with large volumes shipped internationally in recent months. ^[13]

The takeaway: Silver’s rally isn’t only a paper-market story. When participants worry about the ability to source deliverable metal—or fear import frictions—prices can overshoot quickly.

3) Industrial demand is doing the heavy lifting: solar, EVs, electronics — and now AI

Silver’s “dual-use” identity is front and center in this rally.

Reuters reported that the Silver Institute expects industrial demand to be driven higher through 2030 by sectors including solar energy, EVs and their infrastructure, and data centers and artificial intelligence. ^[14]

Business Insider amplified the AI angle, arguing silver has become increasingly tied to the AI infrastructure build-out (data centers, advanced chips, and next‑gen electronics), citing commentary from strategists and industry research. ^[15]

Why the market cares right now: When investors believe demand is “structural” (not just cyclical), they often pay up for scarce materials—and silver’s supply pipeline is notoriously difficult to ramp quickly. ^[16]

4) Momentum, positioning, and the “silver leads gold” narrative

Several widely shared notes this week described a market dynamic where silver is no longer simply “following gold”—it is increasingly leading.

Reuters quoted analysts noting speculative flows into silver as a “more levered play” within the precious-metals complex. ^[17]
ING also pointed to renewed investor interest and a sharply lower gold/silver ratio (a sign of silver outperformance). ^[18]

That’s a powerful cocktail: strong fundamentals + macro tailwinds + momentum traders.

It is also why pullbacks can be sharp.

Forecasts and analyst views published Dec. 8–14: what comes next for silver?

This week’s forecasts largely converge on one message: the long-term setup is constructive, but near-term volatility risk is rising.

Near-term: “Overheated” warnings grow louder

By Friday, as silver fell from the highs, Reuters cited a CMZ note saying the move had become “excessive,” calling for caution even while maintaining a positive longer-term view tied to industrial demand. ^[19]

Technical analysts echoed that. FXStreet’s Dec. 12 coverage described silver as overbought, highlighting RSI readings and warning signals that often show up near short-term peaks. ^[20]

Monex (publishing an excerpt from CPM Group’s advisory) similarly said the medium-term view remains constructive, but flagged the possibility of a pause and retracement after a very fast move. ^[21]

2026 outlook: “Supported, but volatile” is the base case

Among the clearest longer-horizon calls in the Dec. 8–14 window:

• ING (Dec. 8): expects silver prices to remain well-supported, but emphasizes that volatility should persist. ING’s base case includes an average silver price around $55/oz in 2026, citing supply deficits, constrained supply growth, and a more favorable macro backdrop—while warning that a sharper global slowdown could hit the industrial side. ^[22]

Other outlets framed the same outlook with different emphasis:

• The Financial Times highlighted the multi-year supply deficit and how policy/tariff uncertainty can keep markets tight and price-sensitive. ^[23]
• MarketWatch described the $60 milestone as a “make-or-break” moment for a crowded trade and stressed that silver’s history includes dramatic reversals—making risk management essential even for bulls. ^[24]
• The Economic Times (Dec. 14) presented both bullish long-term targets and warnings that the market looks “technically overstretched,” implying corrections are plausible even within a broader uptrend. ^[25]

Technical levels to watch after the $64.64 peak

Even long-term fundamental stories trade through short-term levels. For the week ending Dec. 14, technical coverage repeatedly highlighted a few zones:

Resistance zones

• $62.00–$62.80: a “reclaim” area after Friday’s selloff, cited as near-term resistance/support pivots by FXStreet. ^[26]
• $64.30–$64.65: the recent record-high region that bulls must defend on any retest. ^[27]
• ~$65.00 and $68.17: FXStreet pointed to $65 as a channel/psychological level and highlighted $68.17 as a higher technical target (Fibonacci extension) if momentum returns. ^[28]

Support zones

• $61.00: FXStreet flagged this as first key support after the drop. ^[29]
• $60.00–$60.09: a major psychological and technical area, also referenced as prior support. ^[30]
• ~$59.33: another downside reference level cited by FXStreet. ^[31]

Interpretation: The market just proved it can trade above $60. The next question is whether it can hold above $60 after the first major profit-taking wave.

The biggest risks to silver prices from here

Even the most bullish outlooks published this week carried explicit warnings. The key risks highlighted across Dec. 8–14 analysis include:

A) Macro whiplash: data that changes the Fed narrative

Reuters repeatedly pointed to upcoming U.S. data—including the non‑farm payrolls report due Dec. 16—as a near-term catalyst for rate expectations. If the dollar rebounds and real yields rise, silver can give back gains quickly. ^[32]

B) Industrial demand slowdown or “demand destruction”

ING’s analysis warned the primary risk is industrial: a sharper global slowdown (electronics/manufacturing) could cool silver’s momentum. It also noted higher prices can eventually trigger demand destruction. ^[33]

C) Policy and trade uncertainty cuts both ways

Tariff fear can tighten markets, but any policy clarity that reduces friction can also unwind squeezes. FT and ING both described how policy uncertainty has influenced physical flows and inventory positioning. ^[34]

D) Silver’s defining trait: volatility

ING calls silver “gold on steroids”—it tends to move more than gold in percentage terms. That’s great in a melt-up and painful in a drawdown. ^[35]

What to watch next week: catalysts after Dec. 14, 2025

With the Fed decision behind the market and the weekend pause in trading, attention shifts to:

1. U.S. non-farm payrolls (Dec. 16) and any data that shifts 2026 rate expectations. ^[36]
2. The U.S. dollar and yields, which have been a key tailwind for precious metals in this move. ^[37]
3. Physical tightness signals: inventory movements, regional premiums, and borrowing/lease-rate pressures described in this week’s research. ^[38]
4. Industrial headlines: especially around solar deployment, electrification, and AI/data-center buildout narratives that have increasingly become part of the “silver thesis.” ^[39]
5. Local market amplification (notably India), where currency moves and domestic demand can magnify price swings. ^[40]

Bottom line

Between Dec. 8 and Dec. 14, 2025, silver’s breakout above $60 and sprint to $64.64 crystallized a new market reality: silver is no longer trading as a sleepy cousin of gold. It’s trading as a strategically important industrial metal and a macro-sensitive monetary asset—meaning it can rally explosively when the dollar weakens and physical tightness meets a surge in demand narratives. ^[41]

But the same ingredients that powered the move—momentum, positioning, and tightness—also raise the odds of sharp retracements. Most Dec. 8–14 forecasts converge on a balanced view: well-supported longer-term fundamentals, with elevated near-term volatility. ^[42]

Note: This article is for informational purposes and does not constitute investment advice.

References

1. www.reuters.com, 2. www.reuters.com, 3. www.reuters.com, 4. www.reuters.com, 5. www.reuters.com, 6. www.reuters.com, 7. m.economictimes.com, 8. www.investing.com, 9. www.reuters.com, 10. www.reuters.com, 11. think.ing.com, 12. www.ft.com, 13. think.ing.com, 14. www.reuters.com, 15. www.businessinsider.com, 16. think.ing.com, 17. www.reuters.com, 18. think.ing.com, 19. www.reuters.com, 20. www.fxstreet.com, 21. www.monex.com, 22. think.ing.com, 23. www.ft.com, 24. www.marketwatch.com, 25. m.economictimes.com, 26. www.fxstreet.com, 27. www.fxstreet.com, 28. www.fxstreet.com, 29. www.fxstreet.com, 30. www.fxstreet.com, 31. www.fxstreet.com, 32. www.reuters.com, 33. think.ing.com, 34. www.ft.com, 35. think.ing.com, 36. www.reuters.com, 37. www.reuters.com, 38. think.ing.com, 39. www.reuters.com, 40. m.economictimes.com, 41. www.reuters.com, 42. www.reuters.com