XAG/USD Crashes To $70 Amid Fed’s Hawkish Stance On Rates
BitcoinWorld
GBP/JPY Forecast: Currency Pair Plummets as Safe-Haven Yen Surges on Intense Risk Aversion
The GBP/JPY currency pair experienced significant downward pressure in early 2025 trading sessions, slumping to multi-week lows as investors flocked to the Japanese yen amid intensifying global risk aversion. Market analysts now scrutinize this sharp movement, which reflects broader financial market anxieties and divergent central bank policy trajectories. Consequently, traders reassess their positions while institutional investors seek shelter in traditional safe-haven assets.
Recent trading sessions witnessed the GBP/JPY pair breaking below several key technical support levels. The pair declined approximately 2.8% from its monthly high, testing crucial Fibonacci retracement zones. Market data reveals increased trading volume during the sell-off, confirming genuine bearish sentiment rather than mere profit-taking. Furthermore, moving average convergences turned negative, signaling potential sustained downward momentum.
Technical indicators now paint a cautious picture for the currency pair. The Relative Strength Index (RSI) entered oversold territory briefly before modest recovery. Meanwhile, the Moving Average Convergence Divergence (MACD) histogram shows strengthening bearish momentum. Key support and resistance levels for GBP/JPY currently cluster around psychological price points that previously served as consolidation zones.
| Technical Level | Price Zone | Significance |
|---|---|---|
| Immediate Resistance | 188.50-189.00 | Previous support turned resistance |
| Primary Support | 185.00-185.50 | 200-day moving average convergence |
| Critical Breakdown | Below 184.80 | Opens path to 182.00 level |
The Japanese yen’s appreciation stems from multiple converging fundamental factors. Global equity markets faced substantial volatility as geopolitical tensions resurfaced in several regions. Additionally, disappointing economic data from major economies heightened recession concerns. Investors consequently reduced exposure to riskier assets and sought currency havens.
Bank of Japan policy expectations further influenced yen dynamics. Although the BOJ maintains its ultra-accommodative stance, market participants increasingly anticipate gradual normalization. Recent commentary from central bank officials suggested growing discomfort with prolonged yield curve control. This subtle shift in rhetoric provided additional support for the yen against risk-sensitive currencies.
Comparative interest rate expectations also favored the Japanese currency. The Bank of England faces mounting pressure to ease monetary policy amid softening UK economic indicators. Conversely, even modest BOJ tightening prospects created favorable interest rate differential movements for yen bulls. These macroeconomic crosscurrents significantly impacted the GBP/JPY exchange rate trajectory.
Financial market strategists emphasize the interconnected nature of recent GBP/JPY movements. “The yen traditionally functions as a barometer for global risk sentiment,” noted Dr. Akiko Tanaka, Chief Currency Strategist at Tokyo Financial Institute. “Current appreciation reflects genuine capital preservation efforts rather than speculative positioning.” Her analysis highlights how institutional flows disproportionately affect this currency pair during volatility episodes.
London-based forex analysts simultaneously point to structural vulnerabilities in the British pound. UK economic data continues to show mixed signals, with persistent inflation concerns balanced against weakening consumption patterns. This economic uncertainty limits the Bank of England’s policy flexibility, potentially creating sustained headwinds for sterling against more predictable currencies like the yen.
Historical correlation patterns provide additional context for current movements. The GBP/JPY pair typically exhibits heightened sensitivity during market stress periods, often amplifying broader risk-off movements. Current volatility measures indeed show elevated readings compared to three-month averages, suggesting sustained trader focus on this currency cross.
Widespread risk aversion manifested across multiple asset classes simultaneously. Equity markets experienced broad-based declines, particularly in technology and cyclical sectors. Commodity prices retreated as growth concerns dampened demand expectations. Even traditional hedges like gold witnessed unusual correlation patterns with risk assets.
The flight to safety extended beyond currencies into sovereign debt markets. Japanese government bond yields compressed despite global yield increases, demonstrating exceptional demand for Japanese assets. This capital flow dynamic naturally supported yen appreciation across all major currency pairs, with particularly pronounced effects on GBP/JPY due to sterling’s own vulnerabilities.
Several specific events triggered the latest risk-off episode:
Monetary policy divergence represents a crucial medium-term factor for GBP/JPY direction. The Bank of England maintains a delicate balancing act between persistent service-sector inflation and weakening economic activity. Recent meeting minutes revealed growing internal debate about appropriate policy stance, creating uncertainty that typically weighs on currency valuation.
The Bank of Japan meanwhile navigates its own policy normalization path. While incremental compared to other major central banks, even modest adjustments to yield curve control parameters could significantly impact yen valuation. Market participants closely monitor any signals about timing and magnitude of potential policy shifts, creating asymmetric sensitivity to BOJ communications.
Interest rate differential projections now favor yen appreciation against sterling through mid-2025. Forward rate agreements price in greater BOE easing than previously anticipated, while BOJ tightening expectations gradually increase. This convergence in rate expectations reduces the traditional yield advantage that supported GBP/JPY during previous expansion cycles.
Currency analysts examine historical precedents for similar GBP/JPY movements during risk aversion periods. The pair demonstrated comparable sensitivity during 2020 pandemic volatility and 2022 monetary policy transition phases. Recovery patterns typically involved extended consolidation periods rather than V-shaped rebounds, suggesting patience required for sustained reversal.
Seasonal factors may also influence near-term price action. Japanese fiscal year-end flows traditionally support yen demand during March, potentially extending current trends. Meanwhile, UK budget announcements scheduled for spring could provide catalysts for sterling direction. These calendar considerations add layers to technical and fundamental analysis.
Correlation analysis reveals strengthening relationship between GBP/JPY and global equity volatility indices. The 30-day correlation coefficient reached its highest level in twelve months, indicating synchronized movements across risk assets. This statistical relationship helps institutional investors construct more effective hedging strategies during turbulent periods.
The GBP/JPY forecast remains cautiously bearish amid persistent risk aversion and yen strength. Technical breakdowns below key support levels suggest further downside potential unless fundamental conditions improve substantially. Meanwhile, divergent central bank policy paths create structural headwinds for sterling against the Japanese currency. Traders should monitor global risk indicators and central bank communications for directional cues, while recognizing that volatility likely persists across currency markets. Ultimately, the currency pair’s trajectory will reflect broader financial market confidence and comparative economic resilience between the UK and Japan.
Q1: What caused the recent GBP/JPY decline?
The GBP/JPY pair slumped due to combined yen strength from global risk aversion and sterling weakness from UK economic uncertainty. Investors sought safe-haven assets amid geopolitical tensions and growth concerns.
Q2: How does Bank of Japan policy affect GBP/JPY?
Even modest Bank of Japan policy normalization expectations support yen appreciation. As the BOJ considers adjusting its yield curve control, while the Bank of England faces easing pressure, interest rate differentials shift against sterling.
Q3: What technical levels are important for GBP/JPY?
Key levels include resistance at 188.50-189.00 (previous support), primary support at 185.00-185.50 (200-day MA), and critical breakdown below 184.80 opening path to 182.00.
Q4: Is the yen considered a safe-haven currency?
Yes, the Japanese yen traditionally strengthens during market stress as investors repatriate capital to Japan’s stable financial system and current account surplus provides structural support.
Q5: What should traders monitor for GBP/JPY direction?
Traders should watch global equity volatility, UK economic data, Bank of England communications, Bank of Japan policy signals, and geopolitical developments affecting risk sentiment.
This post GBP/JPY Forecast: Currency Pair Plummets as Safe-Haven Yen Surges on Intense Risk Aversion first appeared on BitcoinWorld.
* For commercial use only
Based on your interests
Overview
4
Crude oil
6
Natural gas
7
Coal
6
Electricity
3
Uranium
2
Outlook
5
* For commercial use only
Based on your interests
EIA. (March 10, 2026). Spot prices for Brent crude oil from 2022 to 2024, with a forecast until 2027 (in U.S. dollars per barrel) [Graph]. In Statista. Retrieved March 19, 2026, from https://www.statista.com/statistics/409404/forecast-for-uk-brent-crude-oil-prices/?__sso_cookie_checker=failed
EIA. “Spot prices for Brent crude oil from 2022 to 2024, with a forecast until 2027 (in U.S. dollars per barrel).” Chart. March 10, 2026. Statista. Accessed March 19, 2026. https://www.statista.com/statistics/409404/forecast-for-uk-brent-crude-oil-prices/?__sso_cookie_checker=failed
EIA. (2026). Spot prices for Brent crude oil from 2022 to 2024, with a forecast until 2027 (in U.S. dollars per barrel). Statista. Statista Inc.. Accessed: March 19, 2026. https://www.statista.com/statistics/409404/forecast-for-uk-brent-crude-oil-prices/?__sso_cookie_checker=failed
EIA. “Spot Prices for Brent Crude Oil from 2022 to 2024, with a Forecast until 2027 (in U.S. Dollars per Barrel).” Statista, Statista Inc., 10 Mar 2026, https://www.statista.com/statistics/409404/forecast-for-uk-brent-crude-oil-prices/?__sso_cookie_checker=failed
EIA, Spot prices for Brent crude oil from 2022 to 2024, with a forecast until 2027 (in U.S. dollars per barrel) Statista, https://www.statista.com/statistics/409404/forecast-for-uk-brent-crude-oil-prices/?__sso_cookie_checker=failed (last visited March 19, 2026)
Spot prices for Brent crude oil from 2022 to 2024, with a forecast until 2027 (in U.S. dollars per barrel) [Graph], EIA, March 10, 2026. [Online]. Available: https://www.statista.com/statistics/409404/forecast-for-uk-brent-crude-oil-prices/?__sso_cookie_checker=failed
BitcoinWorld
EUR/JPY Forecast: Critical Test Looms as Price Battles Key 183.50 Resistance
The EUR/JPY currency pair enters a decisive phase in early 2025, as its price action tests the upper boundary of a significant descending triangle pattern near the 183.50 level. This technical juncture represents a pivotal moment for traders and analysts, with the outcome likely to dictate the medium-term trajectory for the Euro against the Japanese Yen. Consequently, market participants globally are scrutinizing this consolidation for signals of the next major directional move.
A descending triangle is a classic chart pattern signaling a potential continuation of a prior downtrend or a bearish breakout. For EUR/JPY, this pattern has formed over several weeks. The structure features a flat, horizontal support level and a series of lower highs that create a descending resistance line. Currently, the pair is challenging this upper boundary near the 183.50 handle. A confirmed breakout above this descending trendline, especially on a daily closing basis, would invalidate the bearish pattern. Conversely, a rejection here could see price retreat toward the horizontal support, setting the stage for a subsequent breakdown.
Key technical indicators provide additional context for this setup. The 50-day and 200-day simple moving averages are converging, reflecting market indecision. Furthermore, the Relative Strength Index (RSI) is hovering near the 50 midline, showing neither overbought nor oversold conditions. This neutrality suggests the market is in a state of equilibrium, awaiting a fundamental catalyst. Volume analysis during the recent tests of resistance will be crucial for confirming the strength of any breakout or rejection.
To understand the current pattern’s significance, analysts often compare it to previous market structures. The table below outlines key technical characteristics of the current setup versus a similar consolidation observed in late 2024.
| Feature | Current Pattern (Q1 2025) | Previous Pattern (Q4 2024) |
|---|---|---|
| Pattern Type | Descending Triangle | Symmetrical Triangle |
| Key Resistance | ~183.50 (Descending) | ~181.80 (Static) |
| Key Support | ~181.00 (Horizontal) | ~179.50 (Ascending) |
| Duration (Weeks) | 6-8 | 5-7 |
| Preceding Trend | Sideways Consolidation | Moderate Uptrend |
The technical battle at 183.50 is fundamentally rooted in the monetary policy divergence between the European Central Bank (ECB) and the Bank of Japan (BoJ). In 2025, the ECB’s path remains a primary focus. The bank has signaled a cautious approach to further interest rate adjustments following its initial cutting cycle. Market consensus, as reflected in overnight index swaps, prices in a gradual normalization path. However, persistent concerns about regional growth and inflation metrics create uncertainty.
Conversely, the Bank of Japan continues its nuanced exit from ultra-accommodative policy. While it has abandoned negative interest rates and Yield Curve Control (YCC), its policy stance remains the most dovish among major central banks. The pace of future hikes is expected to be exceptionally slow. This enduring policy gap is the core fundamental tension driving EUR/JPY volatility. Key data points influencing this dynamic include:
According to recent Commitments of Traders (COT) reports from major exchanges, speculative positioning in EUR/JPY has become less extreme. Previously large net-long positions have been reduced, indicating that the market has taken profit and is reassessing the direction. This reduction in positioning risk often precedes a significant new trend. Several institutional analysts note that a clean break above 184.00 could trigger algorithmic buying and attract fresh capital. Alternatively, a failure here may see the pair target the 180.00 psychological support zone.
The broader risk environment in 2025 significantly impacts this cross. EUR/JPY often functions as a barometer for global risk sentiment due to the Euro’s moderate risk profile and the Yen’s traditional role as a safe-haven currency. Recent stability in global equity markets and commodity prices has provided a modest tailwind for the Euro. However, geopolitical tensions and concerns about debt sustainability in certain economies linger as potential catalysts for safe-haven flows into the Yen. This external risk factor adds a layer of complexity to the purely technical and policy-driven analysis.
Furthermore, real-world impacts extend beyond trading desks. For European exporters to Japan, a stronger Euro makes goods more expensive for Japanese buyers, potentially affecting trade volumes. For Japanese investors holding European assets, currency fluctuations can significantly amplify or erode returns. This interplay between financial markets and real economic activity underscores the importance of monitoring this currency pair.
The EUR/JPY forecast hinges on the outcome of the current test at the 183.50 resistance level. The descending triangle pattern presents a clear technical framework, while the fundamental backdrop of central bank policy divergence provides the underlying narrative. A confirmed breakout above this level would signal a shift in momentum and potentially open the path toward higher resistance zones. A rejection, however, would reinforce the pattern’s bearish implications and focus attention on key support levels near 181.00. Traders and analysts should monitor price action, volume, and upcoming central bank communications for confirmation of the next major directional move in this significant currency cross.
Q1: What is a descending triangle pattern in technical analysis?
A descending triangle is a bearish chart pattern characterized by a horizontal support level and a descending trendline of lower highs. It typically suggests consolidation before a potential breakdown, but a breakout above the descending resistance can invalidate the pattern.
Q2: Why is the 183.50 level specifically important for EUR/JPY?
The 183.50 level represents the approximate point where the current price action is testing the upper, descending trendline of the triangle. It has also acted as a previous area of resistance and support, giving it technical significance as a key pivot point for market sentiment.
Q3: How do ECB and BoJ policies currently affect EUR/JPY?
The ECB, while past its peak hawkishness, maintains higher interest rates than the BoJ. The BoJ is in the early stages of a very gradual policy normalization. This divergence in interest rates generally supports a stronger Euro against the Yen, making central bank communication a key driver.
Q4: What would a breakout above 183.50 signal for EUR/JPY?
A sustained daily close above the descending trendline near 183.50 would break the bearish structure of the triangle. This could trigger technical buying, with initial targets potentially near the 185.00 and 186.50 levels, depending on momentum and volume.
Q5: What are the main risks to this technical forecast?
The primary risks are unexpected shifts in central bank policy rhetoric, sudden changes in global risk sentiment favoring the safe-haven Yen, or economic data from the Eurozone or Japan that dramatically alters growth and inflation expectations.
This post EUR/JPY Forecast: Critical Test Looms as Price Battles Key 183.50 Resistance first appeared on BitcoinWorld.
Gold price is
in freefall. After spending the better part of 2026 consolidating near all-time
highs above $5,000, the yellow metal has lost approximately 6% in two
consecutive sessions, crashing through the psychologically critical $5,000
barrier on Wednesday and extending the decline to $4,700 per ounce on
Thursday, March 19, 2026, the lowest price since early February.
In this
article, I will break down the technical analysis of the XAU/USD, examine the
mechanics behind this week’s crash, and present the key gold price predictions
for 2026 , including where the real floor is if the selling continues. Based on
my 15 years of experience as an analyst and retail investor, here is what I am
watching.
Follow
me on X for real-time gold market analysis: @ChmielDk
Wednesday’s
FOMC decision was a hold, as expected – Polymarket had it at over 90%
probability and the market was fully prepared for no rate movement. What the
market was not prepared for was the hawkish tone of the dot
plot. The Fed trimmed its 2026 rate cut projections from two cuts to one,
citing hotter-than-expected producer inflation – February’s PPI came in
at +0.7%, well above consensus – and signalled that the Strait of
Hormuz-driven oil spike is creating inflation persistence that prevents easing.
The 10-year
Treasury yield jumped to 4.2%, the Dollar Index climbed toward 99.9, and gold –
a non-yielding asset whose entire bull thesis rested on falling real yields and
a weakening dollar – repriced accordingly.
As Dilin
Wu, Research Strategist at Pepperstone, frames it: “This sharp decline in
gold reflects a confluence of factors – large-scale risk asset liquidations, a
hawkish shift in Fed expectations, and a stronger dollar.” Crucially, he
views this as “a pricing logic adjustment rather than a reversal of the
long-term trend.”
The
technical break below the 50-day MA near $4,978 and below the $5,000
round level triggered momentum selling and profit-taking from a
crowded long, amplifying what was already a fundamental repricing.
The irony
noted by my earlier
gold analysis remains
fully applicable: gold is being sold during an active Middle East conflict
precisely because the oil shock from that conflict is now hurting
gold’s prospects by reigniting inflation and forcing the Fed to stay
hawkish. Higher oil means higher inflation means higher-for-longer rates means
gold suffers despite the geopolitical backdrop that should theoretically
support it.
Bloomberg
Intelligence’s Mike McGlone identified this paradox earlier this
week: “Gold’s best year in 2025 since 1979 – unequalled in a relatively
low-inflation environment – looks prescient ahead of 2026’s closure of the
Strait of Hormuz, with peak-price inklings.
Technical Outlook – What Follows Gold’s Warning? Store of Value’s Speculative Shift – Gold’s best year in 2025 since 1979 — unequaled in a relatively low-inflation environment — looks prescient ahead of 2026’s closure of the Strait of Hormuz, with peak-price inklings. The surge… pic.twitter.com/LhXk2U8EEy
— Mike McGlone (@mikemcglone11) March 16, 2026
The surge
to multiyear extremes vs. most moving averages and broad commodities may
suggest the store of value has shifted to a speculative risk asset.” That
framing – gold as speculative risk asset rather than pure safe haven – is the
most bearish structural argument currently circulating, and the two-day crash
gives it uncomfortable credibility.
As my
technical analysis shows, gold’s two-day, 6% decline has materially changed the
chart structure. The consolidation near the all-time highs that
I described in Tuesday’s analysis has been broken to the downside, and the move
has opened up a sequence of support targets that were previously theoretical
but are now directly in play.
The first
support I am watching is $4,550 – the late 2025 historical
highs that marked the peak before the January blow-off to $5,600. This was an
area of significant buying last year and should attract some demand on the
first test. Below that, $4,360 is the next meaningful level,
representing a prior consolidation zone and Fibonacci retracement target.
The level
that matters most on my entire gold chart is the 200-day EMA at
approximately $4,200. That is the boundary separating a bull trend from a
bear trend, and gold has not traded below it since late 2023. A sustained break
below $4,200 would be a genuinely significant technical event. It would open
the path toward $3,500 per ounce – the lows from which the
current near-uninterrupted rally to $5,600 began. From Thursday’s $4,700, that
scenario implies a further decline of over 25% and would
represent the most severe gold correction since the 2022 Fed tightening cycle.
Why gold price is going down today? Source: Tradingview.com
Analyst @Kb__Officiall had
been maintaining a bearish gold bias since last week, targeting $4,650
as the primary downside target while watching for a potential
retracement to $5,080 before the next leg lower – a level that has now been
blown past entirely.
Weekly Outlook – #Gold( $XAUUSD )
Maintaining my bearish bias on $Gold this week. Last week’s momentum supports the downside and I expect the downward movement to continue.
However, I’m watching for a retracement into the 5080 zone first. If price pulls back into that area, it… pic.twitter.com/Sy6FU54aY8
— K_B📈📉 (@Kb__Officiall) March 15, 2026
His
framework, which generated 12,100 views, is playing out faster than even he
anticipated.
|
Level |
Type |
Notes |
|
$5,600 |
All-time high (Jan 2026) |
Gold -16% from here |
|
$5,000 |
Broken psychological support |
Lost Wednesday, now resistance |
|
$4,700 |
Current price (Mar 19) |
-6% in |
|
$4,550 |
First bear target |
Late 2025 historical highs |
|
$4,360 |
Second bear target |
Prior consolidation zone |
|
$4,200 |
200-day |
Last below here: late 2023 |
|
$3,500 |
Extreme bear target |
2025 rally starting point, -25%+ |
As my earlier
silver analysis warned, silver amplifies gold’s moves in both directions – and Thursday’s
session is proving that rule. Silver has fallen more sharply than gold in
percentage terms, and according to the Saxo Bank commodities report from Ole
Hansen, “silver may face a deeper retracement” due to its
“higher sensitivity to economic growth and industrial demand, combined
with rising concerns that energy-driven inflation will dent global
activity.”
The crowded
speculative positions that built up during the January $121 spike are still
being unwound, and the broader risk-off tone is accelerating exits.
My silver
chart from Tuesday remains valid: the $80 support and 50 EMA are
the immediate battleground. A break below $70 – the lower
consolidation boundary – activates the path toward the 200-day MA at $60 and
ultimately the October 2025 historical highs at $54.
Dilin Wu of
Pepperstone adds that copper is also trading lower and “adding to growth
worries” – when industrial metals fall in unison, it signals that the
market is pricing in genuine demand destruction, not just a monetary policy
adjustment.
The 6%
two-day decline has not materially shifted the major institutional forecasts,
which were built on year-end rather than near-term targets. However, the
technical damage done to the chart warrants a full reassessment of the downside
scenarios.
|
Source |
Gold Target 2026 |
Notes |
|
My chart (extreme bear) |
$3,500 |
If 200 EMA at $4,200 breaks, -25%+ |
|
My chart (bear targets) |
$4,360 then $4,200 |
Sequential support levels |
|
@Kb__Officiall |
$4,650 |
Weekly downside target |
|
World Gold Council |
+5-15% from current |
$4,935-$5,405 scenario |
|
JP Morgan |
$5,000 (Q4 2026) |
Central bank buying thesis |
|
Goldman Sachs |
$6,000 |
Dollar weakness, rate cuts |
|
Robert Kiyosaki |
$35,000 |
One year |
Gold is
falling for the second consecutive session after Wednesday’s Federal Reserve
decision delivered a hawkish hold: rates were kept at 3.5%-3.75% while the dot
plot was revised to show only one rate cut in all of 2026, down from two.
Hotter-than-expected February PPI at +0.7% pushed Treasury yields to 4.2% and
the dollar toward 99.9, both direct headwinds for non-yielding gold.
As shown on
my chart, the sequential downside targets are $4,550 (late
2025 historical highs), then $4,360 (prior consolidation), and
then the 200-day EMA at $4,200 – the critical bull/bear
dividing line. A sustained break below $4,200 opens the path toward $3,500,
the starting point of the entire 2025-2026 rally, representing a decline of
over 25% from Thursday’s $4,700. @Kb__Officiall targets $4,650 as the
near-term downside with potential for further weakness, while Mike McGlone
warns that gold may have shifted from safe-haven to speculative risk asset.
Not
according to the institutional consensus. JP Morgan maintains its $5,000 Q4
2026 target, Goldman Sachs holds its $6,000 forecast, and Dilin Wu of
Pepperstone describes the current decline as “a pricing logic adjustment
rather than a reversal of the long-term trend.” The structural supports –
central bank buying, US fiscal deficits, and geopolitical risk – remain intact.
The
institutional range runs from the World Gold Council’s conservative 5-15%
upside scenario from current levels to Goldman Sachs’ $6,000 target and Robert
Kiyosaki’s extraordinary $35,000
post-bubble-bust forecast. JP Morgan’s base case of $5,000 by Q4 2026 is the most credible
near-term institutional target. On the bear side, my chart’s $3,500 extreme
scenario and @Kb__Officiall’s $4,650 near-term target represent the downside
framework.
Gold price is
in freefall. After spending the better part of 2026 consolidating near all-time
highs above $5,000, the yellow metal has lost approximately 6% in two
consecutive sessions, crashing through the psychologically critical $5,000
barrier on Wednesday and extending the decline to $4,700 per ounce on
Thursday, March 19, 2026, the lowest price since early February.
In this
article, I will break down the technical analysis of the XAU/USD, examine the
mechanics behind this week’s crash, and present the key gold price predictions
for 2026 , including where the real floor is if the selling continues. Based on
my 15 years of experience as an analyst and retail investor, here is what I am
watching.
Follow
me on X for real-time gold market analysis: @ChmielDk
Wednesday’s
FOMC decision was a hold, as expected – Polymarket had it at over 90%
probability and the market was fully prepared for no rate movement. What the
market was not prepared for was the hawkish tone of the dot
plot. The Fed trimmed its 2026 rate cut projections from two cuts to one,
citing hotter-than-expected producer inflation – February’s PPI came in
at +0.7%, well above consensus – and signalled that the Strait of
Hormuz-driven oil spike is creating inflation persistence that prevents easing.
The 10-year
Treasury yield jumped to 4.2%, the Dollar Index climbed toward 99.9, and gold –
a non-yielding asset whose entire bull thesis rested on falling real yields and
a weakening dollar – repriced accordingly.
As Dilin
Wu, Research Strategist at Pepperstone, frames it: “This sharp decline in
gold reflects a confluence of factors – large-scale risk asset liquidations, a
hawkish shift in Fed expectations, and a stronger dollar.” Crucially, he
views this as “a pricing logic adjustment rather than a reversal of the
long-term trend.”
The
technical break below the 50-day MA near $4,978 and below the $5,000
round level triggered momentum selling and profit-taking from a
crowded long, amplifying what was already a fundamental repricing.
The irony
noted by my earlier
gold analysis remains
fully applicable: gold is being sold during an active Middle East conflict
precisely because the oil shock from that conflict is now hurting
gold’s prospects by reigniting inflation and forcing the Fed to stay
hawkish. Higher oil means higher inflation means higher-for-longer rates means
gold suffers despite the geopolitical backdrop that should theoretically
support it.
Bloomberg
Intelligence’s Mike McGlone identified this paradox earlier this
week: “Gold’s best year in 2025 since 1979 – unequalled in a relatively
low-inflation environment – looks prescient ahead of 2026’s closure of the
Strait of Hormuz, with peak-price inklings.
Technical Outlook – What Follows Gold’s Warning? Store of Value’s Speculative Shift – Gold’s best year in 2025 since 1979 — unequaled in a relatively low-inflation environment — looks prescient ahead of 2026’s closure of the Strait of Hormuz, with peak-price inklings. The surge… pic.twitter.com/LhXk2U8EEy
— Mike McGlone (@mikemcglone11) March 16, 2026
The surge
to multiyear extremes vs. most moving averages and broad commodities may
suggest the store of value has shifted to a speculative risk asset.” That
framing – gold as speculative risk asset rather than pure safe haven – is the
most bearish structural argument currently circulating, and the two-day crash
gives it uncomfortable credibility.
As my
technical analysis shows, gold’s two-day, 6% decline has materially changed the
chart structure. The consolidation near the all-time highs that
I described in Tuesday’s analysis has been broken to the downside, and the move
has opened up a sequence of support targets that were previously theoretical
but are now directly in play.
The first
support I am watching is $4,550 – the late 2025 historical
highs that marked the peak before the January blow-off to $5,600. This was an
area of significant buying last year and should attract some demand on the
first test. Below that, $4,360 is the next meaningful level,
representing a prior consolidation zone and Fibonacci retracement target.
The level
that matters most on my entire gold chart is the 200-day EMA at
approximately $4,200. That is the boundary separating a bull trend from a
bear trend, and gold has not traded below it since late 2023. A sustained break
below $4,200 would be a genuinely significant technical event. It would open
the path toward $3,500 per ounce – the lows from which the
current near-uninterrupted rally to $5,600 began. From Thursday’s $4,700, that
scenario implies a further decline of over 25% and would
represent the most severe gold correction since the 2022 Fed tightening cycle.
Why gold price is going down today? Source: Tradingview.com
Analyst @Kb__Officiall had
been maintaining a bearish gold bias since last week, targeting $4,650
as the primary downside target while watching for a potential
retracement to $5,080 before the next leg lower – a level that has now been
blown past entirely.
Weekly Outlook – #Gold( $XAUUSD )
Maintaining my bearish bias on $Gold this week. Last week’s momentum supports the downside and I expect the downward movement to continue.
However, I’m watching for a retracement into the 5080 zone first. If price pulls back into that area, it… pic.twitter.com/Sy6FU54aY8
— K_B📈📉 (@Kb__Officiall) March 15, 2026
His
framework, which generated 12,100 views, is playing out faster than even he
anticipated.
|
Level |
Type |
Notes |
|
$5,600 |
All-time high (Jan 2026) |
Gold -16% from here |
|
$5,000 |
Broken psychological support |
Lost Wednesday, now resistance |
|
$4,700 |
Current price (Mar 19) |
-6% in |
|
$4,550 |
First bear target |
Late 2025 historical highs |
|
$4,360 |
Second bear target |
Prior consolidation zone |
|
$4,200 |
200-day |
Last below here: late 2023 |
|
$3,500 |
Extreme bear target |
2025 rally starting point, -25%+ |
As my earlier
silver analysis warned, silver amplifies gold’s moves in both directions – and Thursday’s
session is proving that rule. Silver has fallen more sharply than gold in
percentage terms, and according to the Saxo Bank commodities report from Ole
Hansen, “silver may face a deeper retracement” due to its
“higher sensitivity to economic growth and industrial demand, combined
with rising concerns that energy-driven inflation will dent global
activity.”
The crowded
speculative positions that built up during the January $121 spike are still
being unwound, and the broader risk-off tone is accelerating exits.
My silver
chart from Tuesday remains valid: the $80 support and 50 EMA are
the immediate battleground. A break below $70 – the lower
consolidation boundary – activates the path toward the 200-day MA at $60 and
ultimately the October 2025 historical highs at $54.
Dilin Wu of
Pepperstone adds that copper is also trading lower and “adding to growth
worries” – when industrial metals fall in unison, it signals that the
market is pricing in genuine demand destruction, not just a monetary policy
adjustment.
The 6%
two-day decline has not materially shifted the major institutional forecasts,
which were built on year-end rather than near-term targets. However, the
technical damage done to the chart warrants a full reassessment of the downside
scenarios.
|
Source |
Gold Target 2026 |
Notes |
|
My chart (extreme bear) |
$3,500 |
If 200 EMA at $4,200 breaks, -25%+ |
|
My chart (bear targets) |
$4,360 then $4,200 |
Sequential support levels |
|
@Kb__Officiall |
$4,650 |
Weekly downside target |
|
World Gold Council |
+5-15% from current |
$4,935-$5,405 scenario |
|
JP Morgan |
$5,000 (Q4 2026) |
Central bank buying thesis |
|
Goldman Sachs |
$6,000 |
Dollar weakness, rate cuts |
|
Robert Kiyosaki |
$35,000 |
One year |
Gold is
falling for the second consecutive session after Wednesday’s Federal Reserve
decision delivered a hawkish hold: rates were kept at 3.5%-3.75% while the dot
plot was revised to show only one rate cut in all of 2026, down from two.
Hotter-than-expected February PPI at +0.7% pushed Treasury yields to 4.2% and
the dollar toward 99.9, both direct headwinds for non-yielding gold.
As shown on
my chart, the sequential downside targets are $4,550 (late
2025 historical highs), then $4,360 (prior consolidation), and
then the 200-day EMA at $4,200 – the critical bull/bear
dividing line. A sustained break below $4,200 opens the path toward $3,500,
the starting point of the entire 2025-2026 rally, representing a decline of
over 25% from Thursday’s $4,700. @Kb__Officiall targets $4,650 as the
near-term downside with potential for further weakness, while Mike McGlone
warns that gold may have shifted from safe-haven to speculative risk asset.
Not
according to the institutional consensus. JP Morgan maintains its $5,000 Q4
2026 target, Goldman Sachs holds its $6,000 forecast, and Dilin Wu of
Pepperstone describes the current decline as “a pricing logic adjustment
rather than a reversal of the long-term trend.” The structural supports –
central bank buying, US fiscal deficits, and geopolitical risk – remain intact.
The
institutional range runs from the World Gold Council’s conservative 5-15%
upside scenario from current levels to Goldman Sachs’ $6,000 target and Robert
Kiyosaki’s extraordinary $35,000
post-bubble-bust forecast. JP Morgan’s base case of $5,000 by Q4 2026 is the most credible
near-term institutional target. On the bear side, my chart’s $3,500 extreme
scenario and @Kb__Officiall’s $4,650 near-term target represent the downside
framework.
– Written by
David Woodsmith
STORY LINK Pound to Dollar Forecast: GBP Sub 1.33 on FED Powell Warning
The Pound to Dollar exchange rate (GBP/USD) held below 1.33, trading near 1.3289 as markets reacted to Wednesday’s key Federal Reserve meeting.
A modest retreat in oil prices has eased pressure on Sterling, but with central bank guidance and energy risks still in focus, traders remain wary of renewed dollar strength.
The Pound to Dollar (GBP/USD) exchange rate maintained a firm tone on Tuesday and hit highs at 1.3375 in Asia on Wednesday before settling close to 1.3350.
The dollar has lost some ground in global markets as oil prices edged lower and overall risk conditions held steady ahead of key central bank rate calls.
GBP/USD will need to move above 1.34 to potentially break out of the downtrend seen from above 1.3850 in late January.
According to UoB; “The slight increase in momentum suggests GBP could edge higher to 1.3410. Based on the current momentum, a clear break above this level appears unlikely.
Get better rates and lower fees on your next international money transfer.
Compare TorFX with top UK banks in seconds and see how much you could save.
It added; “To sustain the mild momentum, GBP must hold above 1.3270.”
Although market conditions are calmer, there is still the risk of rapid and substantial moves.
Central bank developments will also be a key element over the next 36 hours. The Federal Reserve will announce its interest rate decision on Wednesday, with rates expected to be held at 3.75%, while the Bank of England will release its decision on Thursday.
The Fed committee members will also release their updated forecasts or “dot plots” of interest rates. At the December update, the median projection was for one cut during 2026.
ING commented; “The Fed will keep rates on hold, but the risks are clearly of a hawkish revision in the Dot Plot projections, with the median currently signalling one rate cut by year-end. The dollar should benefit from a revision to no cuts in 2026.”
MUFG took a different stance; “The obvious statement he will make is that the longer the conflict lasts the greater the upside risks to energy prices and hence inflation will be. We therefore do not expect the FOMC to alter the median dot profile which in December revealed a profile of one rate cut in 2026 and one in 2027.”
The statement and comments from Chair Powell will also be watched closely. ING did add; “In terms of dovish risks, reintroducing “downside risks” mentioned in the statement’s section about jobs could help markets maintain expectations for a cut on a dual-mandate rationale.”
Central banks will also be uneasy over inflation implications if energy prices remain elevated.
In this context, Danske Bank still sees scope for renewed dollar gains; “irrespective of one’s view on what global central banks should do to address the energy shock, markets are increasingly pricing in a scenario where central banks will tighten financial conditions relative to the pre-war scenario. All else being equal, a stronger USD plays a key role in tightening global financial conditions.”
International Money Transfer? Ask our resident FX expert a money transfer question or try John’s new, free, no-obligation personal service! ,where he helps every step of the way,
ensuring you get the best exchange rates on your currency requirements.
TAGS: Pound Dollar Forecasts
U.S. natural gas futures are down on Wednesday after testing their lowest level since March 4 earlier in the session. Prices are falling amid a mixed fundamental backdrop. Currently, traders are weighing mild weather, steady production, and LNG demand against weakening seasonal consumption.
The USD/JPY pair attracts some sellers on Thursday and erodes a part of the previous day’s strong move up to its highest level since July 2024. Spot prices, however, trim a part of modest intraday losses and trade just below the 159.50 area during the early European session. Meanwhile, the broader setup favors bulls and suggests that the path of least resistance for the pair remains to the upside.
The Bank of Japan (BoJ) decided to keep rates unchanged for the second consecutive meeting, citing risks from the Middle East conflict as a reason for caution. Furthermore, investors remain concerned that the war-driven surge in Crude Oil prices could weaken Japan’s economic growth and rekindle inflationary pressures, create a classic stagflationary environment, and further complicate the BoJ’s normalization efforts. This, in turn, fails to assist the Japanese Yen (JPY) in attracting any meaningful buyers and acts as a tailwind for the USD/JPY pair.
The US Dollar (USD), on the other hand, preserves the previous day’s strong gains in the wake of the Federal Reserve’s (Fed) hawkish outlook. In fact, the US central bank raised the year-end inflation outlook (PCE), citing risks from higher energy prices due to the Iran war. The Fed also upgraded its 2026 growth projection and projected only one rate reduction this year, and one in 2027. This, in turn, favours the USD and validates the near-term positive outlook for the USD/JPY pair as traders now look to the second-tier US economic data for a fresh impetus.
The near-term bias is mildly bullish as the USD/JPY pair holds comfortably above the rising 100-period Exponential Moving Average (EMA) on the 4-hour chart, keeping the broader uptrend intact within the ascending parallel channel whose lower boundary stands around 158.92. Momentum has improved after a brief loss of traction, with the Moving Average Convergence Divergence (MACD) indicator (12, 26, 9) turning back toward the zero line and the Relative Strength Index at 62.49, showing buyers regaining control but still away from overbought territory.
Initial resistance sits at the channel top near 160.79, where prior failures and the upper boundary converge to cap the upside. A clear break above this area would open the way toward the 161.50 region. On the downside, immediate support aligns with the lower channel boundary at 158.92, followed by stronger support around 158.00 at the 100-period EMA, where a break would weaken the bullish bias and expose 157.50 next.
(The technical analysis of this story was written with the help of an AI tool.)
The table below shows the percentage change of Japanese Yen (JPY) against listed major currencies today. Japanese Yen was the strongest against the US Dollar.
| USD | EUR | GBP | JPY | CAD | AUD | NZD | CHF | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| USD | -0.18% | -0.11% | -0.32% | -0.04% | -0.29% | -0.40% | -0.21% | |
| EUR | 0.18% | 0.07% | -0.13% | 0.13% | -0.11% | -0.22% | -0.03% | |
| GBP | 0.11% | -0.07% | -0.21% | 0.07% | -0.18% | -0.29% | -0.11% | |
| JPY | 0.32% | 0.13% | 0.21% | 0.25% | -0.01% | -0.14% | 0.10% | |
| CAD | 0.04% | -0.13% | -0.07% | -0.25% | -0.24% | -0.37% | -0.17% | |
| AUD | 0.29% | 0.11% | 0.18% | 0.00% | 0.24% | -0.12% | 0.07% | |
| NZD | 0.40% | 0.22% | 0.29% | 0.14% | 0.37% | 0.12% | 0.19% | |
| CHF | 0.21% | 0.03% | 0.11% | -0.10% | 0.17% | -0.07% | -0.19% |
The heat map shows percentage changes of major currencies against each other. The base currency is picked from the left column, while the quote currency is picked from the top row. For example, if you pick the Japanese Yen from the left column and move along the horizontal line to the US Dollar, the percentage change displayed in the box will represent JPY (base)/USD (quote).
Copper price didn’t move anything until this moment, due to the continuation of the main indicators besides the stability above the additional support level at $5.5100, which forces it to provide weak trading by its continuous stability near $5.6500.
The stability of the extra support that might help it to activate some bullish attempts in the current period, to expect recording some gains by its rally towards 5.8500 reaching $5.9700 barrier, while breaking the support and holding below it will allow it to reach the corrective stations, which might begin at $5.3900 and $5.2000.
The expected trading range for today is between $5.5500 and $5.8500
Trend forecast: Bullish
The EURJPY repeated attempts to form bullish waves due to providing positive momentum by the main indicators in the last period, to move away from the support at 182.00 and recording some gains by reaching 183.55.
We couldn’t confirm regaining the bullish bias unless breaching the barrier at 184.40 level and holding above it, therefore, we expect forming unstable mixed trading, to keep waiting for surpassing the main levels to confirm the main trend in the upcoming period.
The expected trading range for today is between 182.55 and 184.00
Trend forecast: Fluctuating within the bearish track