The main category of Forex News.
You can use the search box below to find what you need.
[wd_asp id=1]
The main category of Forex News.
You can use the search box below to find what you need.
[wd_asp id=1]
Silver (XAG/USD) is trimming some losses during Friday’s early European session, trading right above $74.00 at the time of writing, after hitting fresh seven-month lows near $64.00 earlier on the day. The pair, however, remains capped below a previous support area, in the vicinity of $75.00.
The white metal has dropped nearly 30% over the last two weeks, weighed down by investors’ relief after US President Trump appointed Kevin Warsh as the replacement for Jerome Powell as the central bank’s chairman, and by easing geopolitical tensions, as the US and Iran opened negotiations to avoid a conflict.
XAG/USD is picking up from lows, with the technical picture showing a bearish scenario. The 50-period Simple Moving Average (SMA), which acted as a dynamic support during the bullish cycle, extends its decline, with the pair holding beneath it. The Moving Average Convergence Divergence (MACD) line has slipped back below the zero line, and the Relative Strength Index (RSI) remains below 50, indicating weak traction.
Silver’s recovery found resistance at the $75.00 area, which is holding bulls for now. Further up, the pair might find resistance at an intraday level around $81.00. Key resistance is at Wednesday’s high in the area of $92.00.
Immediate support is at the daily low of $64.08, below that level, the $60.00 round level, and early December lows, in the $56.00 area, might come into focus
(The technical analysis of this story was written with the help of an AI tool.)
Silver is a precious metal highly traded among investors. It has been historically used as a store of value and a medium of exchange. Although less popular than Gold, traders may turn to Silver to diversify their investment portfolio, for its intrinsic value or as a potential hedge during high-inflation periods. Investors can buy physical Silver, in coins or in bars, or trade it through vehicles such as Exchange Traded Funds, which track its price on international markets.
Silver prices can move due to a wide range of factors. Geopolitical instability or fears of a deep recession can make Silver price escalate due to its safe-haven status, although to a lesser extent than Gold’s. As a yieldless asset, Silver tends to rise with lower interest rates. Its moves also depend on how the US Dollar (USD) behaves as the asset is priced in dollars (XAG/USD). A strong Dollar tends to keep the price of Silver at bay, whereas a weaker Dollar is likely to propel prices up. Other factors such as investment demand, mining supply – Silver is much more abundant than Gold – and recycling rates can also affect prices.
Silver is widely used in industry, particularly in sectors such as electronics or solar energy, as it has one of the highest electric conductivity of all metals – more than Copper and Gold. A surge in demand can increase prices, while a decline tends to lower them. Dynamics in the US, Chinese and Indian economies can also contribute to price swings: for the US and particularly China, their big industrial sectors use Silver in various processes; in India, consumers’ demand for the precious metal for jewellery also plays a key role in setting prices.
Silver prices tend to follow Gold’s moves. When Gold prices rise, Silver typically follows suit, as their status as safe-haven assets is similar. The Gold/Silver ratio, which shows the number of ounces of Silver needed to equal the value of one ounce of Gold, may help to determine the relative valuation between both metals. Some investors may consider a high ratio as an indicator that Silver is undervalued, or Gold is overvalued. On the contrary, a low ratio might suggest that Gold is undervalued relative to Silver.
,
BitcoinWorld
EUR/GBP Forecast: UBS Reveals Crucial Range-Bound Outlook as Budget Fears Subside
LONDON, March 2025 – The EUR/GBP currency pair enters a critical consolidation phase as UBS analysts project sustained range-bound trading following the dissipation of UK budget risk premiums. This development signals a pivotal shift in cross-channel currency dynamics that will influence international trade, investment flows, and monetary policy coordination between the Eurozone and United Kingdom.
UBS Global Wealth Management recently published comprehensive analysis indicating the EUR/GBP pair will likely trade within a narrow band of 0.8550 to 0.8750 throughout 2025. This projection emerges from converging economic fundamentals between the Eurozone and United Kingdom. The Swiss financial institution bases its assessment on multiple quantitative models incorporating inflation differentials, interest rate expectations, and trade balance developments.
Market participants initially priced significant risk premiums into Sterling during the UK’s autumn budget uncertainty. However, subsequent fiscal clarity and improved debt sustainability metrics have gradually eroded these premiums. Consequently, the currency pair has stabilized around technical support and resistance levels established over the past eighteen months. This stabilization reflects broader market recognition that both economies face similar structural challenges despite different monetary policy approaches.
The concept of budget risk premium refers to the additional yield or currency depreciation investors demand when sovereign fiscal policy appears unsustainable. During the UK’s budget formulation process last autumn, markets expressed concern through Sterling weakness against major counterparts. UBS tracking data reveals this premium reached approximately 1.5% at its peak in November 2024.
Several factors contributed to the premium’s subsequent decline:
As the premium evaporated, EUR/GBP volatility declined significantly. The 30-day realized volatility metric dropped from 8.2% in December 2024 to 5.1% by February 2025. This compression created ideal conditions for range-bound behavior as directional catalysts diminished.
Currency analysts observe remarkable alignment between technical patterns and fundamental drivers. The pair has established clear support near the 0.8550 level, corresponding with the 200-day moving average and the psychological 0.8500-0.8550 zone where substantial option barriers reside. Resistance consistently emerges around 0.8750, aligning with the 61.8% Fibonacci retracement of the 2023-2024 downward move.
Fundamentally, both economies exhibit parallel characteristics:
| Metric | Eurozone | United Kingdom |
|---|---|---|
| Core Inflation | 2.8% | 3.1% |
| GDP Growth Forecast | 1.2% | 1.4% |
| Central Bank Policy Rate | 2.75% | 3.25% |
| Current Account Balance | +2.1% of GDP | -1.8% of GDP |
These converging metrics reduce the likelihood of significant divergence that would typically drive sustained directional moves. Market participants increasingly recognize that relative performance matters more than absolute outcomes for currency pair dynamics.
The European Central Bank and Bank of England maintain cautiously divergent policy stances, yet their ultimate trajectories appear more synchronized than markets previously anticipated. Both institutions have signaled a gradual normalization process rather than aggressive easing cycles. This policy parallelism reinforces the range-bound thesis.
ECB President Christine Lagarde emphasized data-dependent approach during her latest press conference, specifically noting that “monetary policy transmission remains strong but uneven across member states.” Simultaneously, Bank of England Governor emphasized the need to “see sustained evidence of inflation returning to target” before considering rate adjustments. These communications create a policy environment where interest rate differentials should remain relatively stable.
Forward rate agreements currently price approximately 50 basis points of easing from both central banks over the next twelve months. This synchronized expectation further supports the range-bound forecast, as currency markets typically respond to differentials rather than absolute rate levels.
Bilateral trade between the Eurozone and United Kingdom has stabilized following post-Brexit adjustments. Goods trade now flows through established customs procedures, while services trade has developed new regulatory frameworks. The resulting predictability reduces currency volatility associated with trade surprises.
Investment patterns reveal similar stabilization. UK-based investors continue allocating to Eurozone equities and bonds, while European investors maintain substantial UK asset holdings. These cross-border investments create natural hedging flows that dampen currency movements. Portfolio rebalancing typically occurs within established ranges unless fundamental dislocations emerge.
The current range-bound projection contrasts sharply with historical EUR/GBP behavior. The pair experienced significant volatility during several previous periods:
Present conditions differ fundamentally because both economies face similar external shocks and internal adjustments. Energy security improvements, supply chain diversification, and inflation management approaches show remarkable convergence. This synchronization reduces the probability of asymmetric shocks that would typically drive sustained currency moves.
Comparative analysis with other major currency pairs reinforces the uniqueness of current EUR/GBP dynamics. While USD pairs experience Federal Reserve-driven volatility and JPY pairs respond to Bank of Japan policy shifts, EUR/GBP benefits from regional economic integration despite political separation. This creates a distinctive market microstructure where range-trading strategies often outperform directional approaches.
The range-bound forecast carries significant implications for different market participants:
Corporate treasurers can implement more predictable hedging programs with reduced volatility premiums. Institutional investors may adjust currency overlay strategies to emphasize yield capture rather than directional positioning. Retail traders might find range-trading approaches more effective than breakout strategies that dominated previous periods.
Several specific strategies gain prominence in this environment:
Risk management considerations shift accordingly. Tail risk protection becomes less expensive as implied volatility declines, while position sizing may increase due to reduced uncertainty. However, traders must remain vigilant for potential range breaks if unexpected divergence emerges between the two economies.
Ongoing EU-UK regulatory alignment discussions create additional stability. Financial services equivalence negotiations, though progressing slowly, establish frameworks for cross-border activity. Meanwhile, the Windsor Framework implementation has reduced Northern Ireland-related uncertainties that previously affected Sterling sentiment.
Geopolitical developments affect both currencies similarly. Energy security initiatives, climate transition investments, and defense spending increases show parallel trajectories. This common exposure means external shocks typically impact both currencies in comparable magnitude, preserving their relative valuation.
The EUR/GBP currency pair appears destined for extended range-bound trading as budget risk premiums fade and economic fundamentals converge. UBS analysis correctly identifies the diminishing catalysts for sustained directional moves, pointing toward a consolidation phase where technical boundaries gain increased significance. Market participants should prepare for an environment where relative value analysis and range-trading strategies outperform directional approaches. This EUR/GBP forecast reflects broader financial market normalization following years of exceptional volatility, representing a maturation in cross-channel economic relations that benefits traders, corporations, and policymakers alike.
Q1: What does “range-bound” mean for EUR/GBP?
A range-bound market refers to a currency pair trading within established upper and lower boundaries without breaking out to new highs or lows. For EUR/GBP, UBS identifies 0.8550 as key support and 0.8750 as primary resistance.
Q2: How long might this range-bound period last?
While precise timing remains uncertain, UBS analysis suggests the range could persist throughout 2025 unless unexpected economic divergence emerges between the Eurozone and United Kingdom.
Q3: What would break the EUR/GBP out of its range?
Sustained breakout would require significant divergence in monetary policy, unexpected inflation developments, geopolitical events affecting one region disproportionately, or substantial changes in trade or capital flows.
Q4: How does budget risk premium affect currency values?
Budget risk premium represents the additional compensation investors demand when fiscal policy appears unsustainable. As this premium increases, the affected currency typically weakens. Conversely, premium reduction supports currency stabilization or strengthening.
Q5: What trading strategies work best in range-bound markets?
Range-trading approaches like buying near support and selling near resistance often prove effective. Option strategies that benefit from time decay and volatility compression also perform well, while breakout strategies typically underperform during consolidation phases.
This post EUR/GBP Forecast: UBS Reveals Crucial Range-Bound Outlook as Budget Fears Subside first appeared on BitcoinWorld.
96
Nostradamus Prediction 2026: The predictions that French astrologer Nostradamus made continue to attract public interest in the present times. People connect his mysterious writings to financial markets because current global uncertainty, inflation concerns, and geopolitical conflicts are increasing. The year 2026 will bring metals such as gold, silver, and copper back into public attention because both market predictions and actual market conditions will drive their value.
Nostradamus never directly mentioned gold or silver prices. His writings about economic instability, currency weakness, and social unrest revealed his belief about these economic conditions. People throughout history have used gold and silver to preserve their wealth during times when these economic factors became evident, according to expert interpretation of these themes.
Gold exists as the primary safe-haven investment. Gold prices will increase during 2026 because central banks increase their purchases, inflation causes market trends, and global conflicts create demand, according to current market trends. Investors seek dependable assets during periods of market uncertainty, which will keep gold prices high, according to analysts. (ESTIMATE PRICE)
Silver functions as both a precious metal and an industrial material. The increasing requirement for solar panels, electronics, and electric vehicles will cause silver prices to experience fluctuating yet upward price movements during 2026. The Nostradamus-style analysis of industrial growth and warfare establishes a foundation for predicting silver demand throughout time. (ESTIMATE PRICE)
Copper serves as an essential component of economic development. Electric vehicles, renewable energy sources, and infrastructure development will create increased demand for copper. The combination of supply shortages and slow mining industry expansion will lead to higher copper prices, which will continue until 2026. (ESTIMATE PRICE)
The current market indicators show strong demand for metals while their supply levels remain restricted. The ongoing inflation, together with interest rate uncertainties and global economic instability, has resulted in increased metal prices.
Nostradamus and modern economics both show that gold, silver, and copper will remain valuable assets in 2026. The actual market prices will depend on economic and geopolitical events.
Disclaimer- This is for informational purposes only and not investment advice; metal prices can fluctuate due to market risks.
WTI futures CL=F are holding in a tight but heavy band in the low-$60s, recently orbiting roughly $62.5–$64.0 per barrel after another soft session, while Brent BZ=F is sitting just under $68, with recent prints around $67–$68.5. Brent has traded near $68.09 and WTI around $63.9, modestly above Thursday’s close but clearly below Monday’s marks, locking in the first weekly decline of 2026 after a seven-week run-up driven more by risk premium than by demand strength. Intraday behavior is classic late-trend fatigue: one-day pops of 2–3% on U.S.–Iran headlines that fade into closes lower in the week, with CL=F oscillating around $62–$64 and BZ=F chopping between about $66.9 and $68.8 rather than establishing new momentum higher.
The core geopolitical driver for BZ=F is the negotiation track between Washington and Tehran in Oman. Iran exports roughly 3.4 million barrels per day and controls the Strait of Hormuz, which carries close to 20% of global oil liquids. That is why a single report about talks being “called off” can push Brent up more than 3%, as happened when BZ=F spiked toward $69.5 before retracing once Iran’s foreign minister confirmed the meeting was still on. The market is already pricing a non-zero probability of a misstep that briefly disrupts flows or triggers naval incidents around Hormuz, and that premium is embedded in BZ=F at ~$68. At the same time, the longer the two sides sit in the same room without missiles flying, the easier it becomes for macro desks to fade that risk premium and re-anchor valuations to supply, demand and inventory data rather than “what-if” scenarios.
The sharpest fundamental tell for BZ=F is Saudi Aramco’s decision to cut official selling prices again. For March, Aramco moved Arab Light to Asia down to parity with the Oman/Dubai average, a 30-cent cut from February and the lowest differential since December 2020. Heavier grades to Asia were cut by about $0.40 a barrel, and prices for all grades into the U.S., Northwest Europe and the Mediterranean were also reduced. When the largest exporter in the system pushes its flagship grade down to benchmark rather than commanding a premium, it is effectively admitting that refiners are pushing back on pricing and that demand does not justify aggressive differentials. For BZ=F, that means the futures strip is being held up by OPEC+ policy and geopolitics while the physical barrel is quietly being discounted to keep flows moving. That divergence is not sustainable indefinitely: either Asian product margins and refinery runs improve, or Brent’s paper market needs to adjust lower to reflect weaker realized buying power.
OPEC+ left output policy unchanged for March and provided no firm guidance beyond Q1. That effectively keeps a soft floor under CL=F and BZ=F: the group is willing to defend prices from collapsing into the mid-$50s but does not want to reignite a rush toward $80+ that would trigger fresh non-OPEC supply and political backlash. U.S. inventory data fit that narrative. Commercial crude stocks, excluding the SPR, fell by around 3.5 million barrels to roughly 420 million, about 4% below the five-year seasonal average. On a headline level, that looks constructive for CL=F, but it needs to be read against Saudi OSP cuts and a relatively calm spot market. Draws of a few million barrels in a world with slowing demand growth and weaker product cracks do not justify a new bull leg by themselves. OPEC+ is essentially buying time: the cartel’s discipline prevents a disorderly crash in CL=F, but absent a demand surprise the same policy also caps the upside because every rally encourages cheating, hedging and opportunistic supply.
On the sanctions front, the European Union has moved from calibration to escalation. The new package bans EU financial, legal, insurance and other maritime services for any shipment of Russian crude or refined products, effectively making the G7 price cap irrelevant inside EU jurisdiction because there is no longer a compliance carve-out: Russian cargoes simply cannot access EU-linked service providers, regardless of price. That forces more Russian barrels into a smaller “shadow fleet” of older tankers operating under opaque flags and insurance, and concentrates flows into buyers such as India and China who demand deeper discounts to compensate for sanctions, logistics and financing risk. For BZ=F, this is structurally supportive. European and aligned refiners are pushed further toward non-Russian grades, strengthening demand for Brent-linked streams and North Sea blends. The impact is greatest on differentials and spreads rather than outright price: Urals and other Russian grades must trade at steeper discounts, while BZ=F maintains a firmer floor than it otherwise would at the same macro backdrop.
Technically, CL=F is trading in a defined range with an upward bias. On the daily timeframe, WTI has been consolidating between roughly $66.4 on the topside and $62.4 on the downside in recent weeks, with a rising trendline under price that originates from the autumn lows. That trendline is where systematic and discretionary accounts repeatedly step in: each time CL=F drifts into the lower $60s and tags that line, buy programs appear, and price rotates back toward the upper band. On the four-hour chart, that dynamic is even clearer. The line is acting as a pivot for short-horizon strategies that run tight risk below it and targets toward previous local highs. The first real technical warning shot only comes if CL=F breaks decisively below that trendline and pushes toward the $58.8 region that many desks mark as the next strong support. BZ=F is behaving slightly better than CL=F, consistently holding a multi-dollar premium and finding demand when it dips into the mid-$60s. That reflects the Hormuz risk premium and stronger pull from sanctions-constrained refiners, and it keeps the Brent–WTI spread wide enough to incentivize some seaborne arbitrage into the Atlantic Basin.
Macro conditions are not set up for a runaway rally in CL=F or BZ=F. The dollar index has bounced off its lows as Fed officials lean more hawkish, explicitly saying they are not prepared to cut rates again without clean evidence that disinflation has resumed. A stronger dollar directly raises the local-currency price of WTI and Brent for non-U.S. buyers, dampening incremental demand. At the same time, risk assets more broadly are under pressure: crypto has endured forced deleveraging, equities have rolled over from recent highs and even gold and silver have seen violent two-way swings. When cross-asset volatility spikes, capital allocators reduce gross exposure across the board, and commodities are not exempt. In that environment, CL=F in the low-$60s and BZ=F near $68 are high enough that profit-taking is rational but not high enough to trigger panicked short-covering. The macro message is simple: conditions are too fragile to support a sustainable move back above the low-$70s on WTI without a new shock, yet not weak enough to justify a structural collapse below the high-$50s unless global growth data deteriorate sharply.
Positioning in CL=F and BZ=F has normalized from the extremes seen earlier in the risk-premium build-up. Managed money has reduced net long exposure, shedding some of the trend-following length accumulated during the seven-week rally, but has not flipped into a large structural short. Books are smaller and turnover is higher, which is exactly what you expect in a noisy, headline-driven market where no single narrative dominates. Physical flows reinforce that two-sided picture. India continues to buy discounted Russian crude while watching U.S.–India trade dynamics; China is opportunistic rather than aggressive; U.S. shale producers are maintaining capital discipline and are not rushing to flood the market with incremental barrels at $62–$64 WTI. That combination means there is no obvious supply shock on the horizon, but also no wall of new demand to absorb every dip. The result is a market where CL=F can trade between roughly $58 and $68 for an extended period, with temporary breakouts on geopolitical noise and quick mean-reversions when those headlines fade.
Putting the pieces together, the picture is precise. CL=F around the low-$60s and BZ=F near $68 are sitting on the intersection of four forces: a stubborn but not unlimited U.S.–Iran risk premium, Saudi and OPEC+ policy engineered to protect a floor but not a spike, sanctions that structurally support non-Russian benchmarks, and macro conditions that lean against aggressive risk-on behavior. The tape is not screaming for a collapse, because OPEC+ discipline, EU sanctions on Russian flows and U.S. inventory levels prevent a disorderly oversupply. It is also not signaling a sustainable surge, because Saudi OSP cuts, cautious Asian demand and a firm dollar cap the willingness of refiners and macro funds to pay materially higher prices. In that setting, oil exposure via CL=F and BZ=F at current levels is best treated as a controlled-risk Buy with a hard line in the sand around $58–$60 on WTI. Above that zone, the structural support from sanctions and producer discipline, plus the ever-present Hormuz premium, argues that dips are more attractive than rips. A clean break of $58 in CL=F, accompanied by weaker demand data and softer Brent, would flip that stance to neutral or outright short, but until that technical damage is done, the balance of fact-based evidence still favors maintaining upside exposure with disciplined risk controls rather than abandoning oil altogether.
– Written by
Frank Davies
STORY LINK Pound to Dollar Forecast: GBP Under Pressure as BoE Signals Cuts Ahead
The Pound to Dollar exchange rate (GBP/USD) has come under renewed pressure as a knife-edge Bank of England decision collides with rising UK political uncertainty, reviving downside risks for Sterling just as markets begin to price earlier interest-rate cuts.
A sharply divided Monetary Policy Committee and leadership speculation surrounding Prime Minister Starmer have unsettled investors, leaving GBP/USD vulnerable near key support levels amid broader FX volatility.
The Pound to Dollar (GBP/USD) exchange rate was subjected to heavy losses after the Thursday open amid UK political fears.
After a tentative recovery, there was a fresh U-turn following a dovish Bank of England policy decision with GBP/USD sliding to 10-day lows below 1.3550 before a recovery to 1.3590 as wider FX volatility spiked.
ING commented; “Today’s dovish communication from the BoE has added to a softer pound – already under pressure from local politics.”
A sustained break below the 1.3550-70 support area would risk further losses.
Get better rates and lower fees on your next international money transfer.
Compare TorFX with top UK banks in seconds and see how much you could save.
The dollar secured wider gains amid weaker equities, but then retreated after a higher than expected figure for US jobless claims.
ING pointed to underlying market stresses; “A burgeoning sell-off in US tech stocks and ongoing volatility in the metals markets are providing many cross-currents for FX.”
The Bank of England (BoE) Monetary Policy Committee (MPC) held interest rates at 3.75% following the latest policy decision, in line with strong consensus forecasts.
There was, however, a very narrow 5-4 vote for the decision as Dhingra, Taylor, Ramsden and Breedon voted for a further 25 basis-point cut to 3.50%.
The majority commented that further evidence was needed on wages and inflation before having confidence in another cut.
Bailey and Mann, however, had greater confidence in the inflation outlook which suggested that they were very close to backing a cut at this meeting.
According to the dissenters, inflation risks had declined further and that policy was too restrictive which justified a further cut.
There was some relief in the bond market with the 10-year yield retreating to around 4.53% from 4.58% earlier in the session.
Following the decision, markets are pricing in 50 basis points in cuts this year compared with 35 basis points ahead of the latest decision.
According to MUFG; “It certainly looks like we could get a cut as early as the next policy meeting.”
Danske Bank Analyst Kirstine Kundby-Nielsen commented; “I think it will be pretty tight whether it will be a March or April cut, but I think the point is that, prior to this it was priced that we would see only one more cut, but now two could definitely be in play.”
According to Schroders senior economist George Brown; “Today’s rate decision was seen as a foregone conclusion, but the Bank’s close vote to hold rates suggests cuts are not a matter of if, but when.”
He sees scope for Governor Bailey to back one or two cuts over the next few months.
Nevertheless, he added; “However, the Bank will have to act soon if it intends to cut, before that window closes and the opportunity for further easing slams shut in the second half of the year.”
Political difficulties for Prime Minister Starmer have also undermined the Pound amid concerns over a challenge on Starmer which could jeopardise the position of Chancellor Reeves.
BBH commented; “GBP and gilts plunged, driven by UK political uncertainty. Prime Minister Keir Starmer is facing intense leadership speculation over his decision to appoint Peter Mandelson as US ambassador, despite knowing about his connection to Jeffrey Epstein.”
International Money Transfer? Ask our resident FX expert a money transfer question or try John’s new, free, no-obligation personal service! ,where he helps every step of the way,
ensuring you get the best exchange rates on your currency requirements.
TAGS: Pound Dollar Forecasts
The world’s oil demand growth is set to rise by 930,000 barrels per day (bpd) in 2026, thanks to lower oil prices and a normalization of economies after the 2025 tariff chaos, the International Energy Agency (IEA) said on Wednesday, raising its demand growth estimate by 70,000 bpd from last month.
Oil demand is forecast to grow by an average 930,000 bpd this year, accelerating from 850,000 bpd in 2025, the agency said in its closely-watched Oil Market Report for January.
In the December report, the IEA had expected global oil demand growth at 860,000 bpd for 2026.
The upgrade reflects a recovery in feedstock demand in the petrochemicals industry, on top of expectations of normalized economic conditions after the unpredictable and chaotic tariff policy of the Trump Administration last year.
The tariff threats haven’t gone away, but global trade and economies appear to have overcome the initial shock.
Despite lower output from Kazakhstan and a number of Middle Eastern OPEC producers in recent weeks, global oil supply is now projected to rise by 2.5 million bpd this year to 108.7 million bpd, following a jump of 3 million bpd in 2025, according to the IEA.
Yet, the implied surplus on the global oil market would be lower compared to last month’s estimate. In December, the IEA expected an implied surplus of 3.84 million bpd, while in the January report the implied glut is 3.69 million bpd, mostly due to the increase in the IEA’s demand growth forecast.
Inventories are rising, in both crude and products, and weigh on global oil prices, despite brief spikes driven by geopolitical developments in Venezuela and Iran, the Paris-based agency noted.
“Indeed, benchmark crude oil prices remain $16/bbl lower than a year ago, reflecting the large global supply surplus that built up over the past 12 months, in line with our forecasts,” the IEA said.
Observed global oil stocks rose by 1.3 million bpd on average in 2025, visible in the surge in oil on water, higher Chinese crude stocks, and a rise in U.S. gas liquids inventories, the agency noted.
“For now, bloated balances provide some comfort to market participants and have kept prices in check,” the IEA said.
By Tsvetana Paraskova for Oilprice.com
More Top Reads From Oilprice.com
The EURJPY pair provided several weak sideways trading, delaying the bullish trend due to its stability below 185.45 barrier, to form some mixed trading by reaching 184.35 level.
Note that stochastic exit from the overbought level might increase the negative pressures on the trading, forcing it to provide negative corrective trading, to target 183.85 level reaching the bullish channel’s support at 183.20, while breaching the barrier and holding above it will reinforce the chances of recording extra gains that might begin at 186.20.
The expected trading range for today is between 183.85 and 185.40
Trend forecast: Fluctuating within the bullish trend
Gold (XAU/USD) is trimming some losses on Friday, trading near $4,880 at the time of writing, after bounding from lows at $4.655 during the Asian session. A risk-averse market mood is providing some support to precious metals, although the US Dollar’s strength is keeping upside attempts limited for now.
Gold drew some support from weak US employment data released earlier this week, which has reactivated pressure on the Federal Reserve to ease borrowing costs further. Beyond that, investors have turned averse to risk, following a three-day sell-off on Wall Street that has spilled over into Forex markets, increasing demand for safe havens like Gold.
The 4-hour chart shows XAU/USD trading at $4,876, capped below the 100-period Simple Moving Average (SMA), but with technical indicators suggesting an improving momentum. The Moving Average Convergence Divergence’s (MACD) negative histogram is contracting, and the MACD line seems about to close above the signal line. The Relative Strength Index has reached a neutral area coming from bearish levels.
The immediate trend remains negative, but Thursday’s higher low gives some hope for bulls. The upward turning indicators suggest that the pair would be in a CD leg of a Gartley pattern, aiming towards the 78.6% Fibinacci resistance of last week’s sell off, at $5,340.
Before that, however, the precious metal is likely to find resistance at the mentioned 100-period SMA, now around $4,920, and at the weekly high, in the area of $5,100. Support levels are at session lows of $4,655, and Monday’s low, at the $4,400 area.
(The technical analysis of this story was written with the help of an AI tool.)
Gold has played a key role in human’s history as it has been widely used as a store of value and medium of exchange. Currently, apart from its shine and usage for jewelry, the precious metal is widely seen as a safe-haven asset, meaning that it is considered a good investment during turbulent times. Gold is also widely seen as a hedge against inflation and against depreciating currencies as it doesn’t rely on any specific issuer or government.
Central banks are the biggest Gold holders. In their aim to support their currencies in turbulent times, central banks tend to diversify their reserves and buy Gold to improve the perceived strength of the economy and the currency. High Gold reserves can be a source of trust for a country’s solvency. Central banks added 1,136 tonnes of Gold worth around $70 billion to their reserves in 2022, according to data from the World Gold Council. This is the highest yearly purchase since records began. Central banks from emerging economies such as China, India and Turkey are quickly increasing their Gold reserves.
Gold has an inverse correlation with the US Dollar and US Treasuries, which are both major reserve and safe-haven assets. When the Dollar depreciates, Gold tends to rise, enabling investors and central banks to diversify their assets in turbulent times. Gold is also inversely correlated with risk assets. A rally in the stock market tends to weaken Gold price, while sell-offs in riskier markets tend to favor the precious metal.
The price can move due to a wide range of factors. Geopolitical instability or fears of a deep recession can quickly make Gold price escalate due to its safe-haven status. As a yield-less asset, Gold tends to rise with lower interest rates, while higher cost of money usually weighs down on the yellow metal. Still, most moves depend on how the US Dollar (USD) behaves as the asset is priced in dollars (XAU/USD). A strong Dollar tends to keep the price of Gold controlled, whereas a weaker Dollar is likely to push Gold prices up.
The Pound Sterling (GBP) changed course against the US Dollar (USD), with GBP/USD giving up nearly 200 pips in a dramatic correction.
GBP/USD faced a double whammy during the week, with resurgent haven demand for the US Dollar (USD) on one hand. While the dovish Bank of England (BoE) interest rate on hold decision smashed the pair on the other hand.
In doing so, the pair reversed a majority of gains seen from the beginning of this year, extending the correction from over four-year highs of 1.3869 reached on January 27.
The Greenback attracted haven demand as markets embarked on a solid rotation spree, with capital flowing out of overvalued and growth assets, such as tech stocks, Gold, Silver etc., into value assets and undermined ones like the USD.
Markets resorted to ‘sell-everything’ mode as the AI rout deepened, boosting the USD recovery against its six major currency rivals. The end of the partial government shutdown on Tuesday also helped the buck maintain its ground, despite a slew of weak US labor data and concerns over the US Federal Reserve’s (Fed) monetary policy outlook under the leadership of Kevin Warsh.
The Automatic Data Processing (ADP) Research Institute said on Wednesday, private sector employment in the US rose 22,000 in January, against a forecast of 48,000. Meanwhile, Initial claims for state unemployment benefits jumped 22,000 to a seasonally adjusted 231,000 for the week ended January 31, the Labor Department said on Thursday.
“The US December JOLTS report shows a steep drop-off in job openings to 6.54 million from a downwardly revised 6.93 million level in November,” according to ING Bank.
In the second half of the week, the dovish BoE storm pounded the Pound Sterling further. The UK central bank kept interest rates on hold at 3.75% in February.
The BoE nine-member Monetary Policy Committee (MPC) voted by a slim 5:4 majority to keep rates steady. Four members voted to lower rates.
Expectations of a sharp drop in inflation in the coming months also added to the dovish BoE outlook, fueling bets for a rate cut as early as next month.
In light of the dovish tilt, the focus is now on a series of speeches from BoE policymakers, with Governor Andrew Bailey’s appearance late Sunday eagerly awaited.
A slew of Fed and BoE officials are also set to speak on Tuesday, with Monday being a data-light day.
Tuesday will also feature the US Retail Sales report and the quarterly Employment Cost Index.
On Wednesday, the delayed US January jobs data will be published, with key focus on the headline Nonfarm Payrolls print.
The quarterly and monthly Gross Domestic Product (GDP) data will be released from the United Kingdom (UK) on Thursday, followed by the US Jobless Claims data.
On Friday, BoE Chief Economist Huw Pill will participate in a fireside chat at an event hosted by Santander Bank in London ahead of the critical US Consumer Price Index (CPI) inflation report.
Besides these economic events, geopolitics will continue to grab attention amid US President Donald Trump’s erratic international policies.
GBP/USD Technical Analysis
The 21-, 50-, 100- and 200-day Simple Moving Averages (SMA) all rise, with the shorter ones positioned above the longer, reinforcing buyers’ control. Price holds above these markers, with the 21-day SMA at 1.3564 offering nearby dynamic support. The Relative Strength Index (RSI) stands at 51 (neutral) and has edged higher, hinting stabilizing momentum. Measured from the 1.3346 low to the 1.3868 high, the 61.8% retracement at 1.3545 offers a floor, while the 50.0% retracement at 1.3607 is the level bulls would seek to reclaim to extend the advance.
Shorter SMAs continue to advance over the medium-term ones, and the broader set trends higher, underpinning an upward bias. The pair trades above the 50-day SMA at 1.3475 and the 200-day SMA at 1.3430, keeping dip-buying interest intact. RSI near 51 remains neutral; a firm move above 60 would strengthen the upside impulse. On setbacks, the 100-day SMA at 1.3379 would serve as the next layer of support.
(The technical analysis of this story was written with the help of an AI tool.)
A country’s Gross Domestic Product (GDP) measures the rate of growth of its economy over a given period of time, usually a quarter. The most reliable figures are those that compare GDP to the previous quarter e.g Q2 of 2023 vs Q1 of 2023, or to the same period in the previous year, e.g Q2 of 2023 vs Q2 of 2022.
Annualized quarterly GDP figures extrapolate the growth rate of the quarter as if it were constant for the rest of the year. These can be misleading, however, if temporary shocks impact growth in one quarter but are unlikely to last all year – such as happened in the first quarter of 2020 at the outbreak of the covid pandemic, when growth plummeted.
A higher GDP result is generally positive for a nation’s currency as it reflects a growing economy, which is more likely to produce goods and services that can be exported, as well as attracting higher foreign investment. By the same token, when GDP falls it is usually negative for the currency.
When an economy grows people tend to spend more, which leads to inflation. The country’s central bank then has to put up interest rates to combat the inflation with the side effect of attracting more capital inflows from global investors, thus helping the local currency appreciate.
When an economy grows and GDP is rising, people tend to spend more which leads to inflation. The country’s central bank then has to put up interest rates to combat the inflation. Higher interest rates are negative for Gold because they increase the opportunity-cost of holding Gold versus placing the money in a cash deposit account. Therefore, a higher GDP growth rate is usually a bearish factor for Gold price.
New York, February 6, 2026, 06:19 EST — Premarket
U.S. natural gas futures ticked slightly higher Friday morning, hovering close to $3.50 per million British thermal units (mmBtu). Investors weighed a record storage withdrawal while anticipating the latest weather forecasts. 1
The market wrestles with two narratives at once. First, the scale of last week’s inventory drop. Second, whether forecasts continue to signal a milder period ahead, which could dampen heating demand and ease withdrawals.
Storage now acts as the key buffer against late-winter cold. Once that cushion shrinks, even minor shifts in temperature forecasts can send prices sharply higher — and they have.
Working natural gas stocks in the Lower 48 dropped by 360 billion cubic feet (Bcf) for the week ending Jan. 30. That marks the largest weekly net withdrawal ever recorded in the government’s storage data, the U.S. Energy Information Administration reported. The agency linked the steep draw to Winter Storm Fern and related supply interruptions. 2
The EIA reported working gas in storage at 2,463 Bcf for Jan. 30, marking a 360 Bcf drop from the previous week and sitting 27 Bcf under the five-year average. Despite that, inventories remain 41 Bcf higher than this time last year. The following weekly storage update is scheduled for Feb. 12. 3
The storage number was also below the median market forecast. The much-followed calendar of estimates had predicted a 379 Bcf draw, but the actual withdrawal came in at 360 Bcf, following a 242 Bcf pull from the previous week. 4
A Reuters poll before the data came out estimated a withdrawal near 374 Bcf, noting unusually elevated “heating degree days”—which track how much temperatures fall below 65°F and roughly indicate heating needs—according to LSEG figures. 5
LNG continues to play a crucial role. Cristian Signoretto, Eni’s head of global gas and LNG, said at an industry conference this week that the 2026 LNG market appears “finely balanced.” He cautioned that unexpected cold snaps or heatwaves could swiftly throw supply and demand out of alignment. 6
That said, a few analysts caution the market won’t dwell on the storage news if forecasts stay mild. “Unless we get another major blast … winter might be over soon,” Phil Flynn, senior market analyst at Price Futures Group, noted in a recent briefing. 7
There’s a clear risk for bulls here: should temperatures ease and supply keep bouncing back from weather disruptions, daily demand could fall fast. That would shrink storage withdrawals and leave futures vulnerable to another steep drop.
Traders are eyeing updated medium-range U.S. temperature forecasts through mid-February, looking for clues on LNG feedgas demand shifts. Thursday’s Feb. 12 storage report will be key to confirming whether last week’s draw was just a one-off shock or signals a tighter end-of-winter stretch.