Tariffs bite, budget cracks widen, bets surge—pressure’s building and the technicals aren’t offering much relief.
- USD/JPY correlations with key macro drivers remain weak entering Q3
- Political risks and tariff policy are weighing on the U.S. dollar
- Markets now favour three Fed cuts in 2025 as data softens
- BoJ hike risk alive if trade tensions ease; markets split on timing
- USD/JPY downside favoured, with 138.00 key if 140.25 gives way
USD/JPY Outlook Summary
With weakening through Q2 and falling correlations with traditional macro drivers, markets are clearly responding to a different set of influences. Once a pair heavily dictated by U.S.–Japan rate differentials and risk sentiment, that relationship has broken down, raising the prospect that political developments—especially those linked to U.S. trade and fiscal policy—may now be playing a greater role in driving price action.
This piece explores the fundamental backdrop heading into H2 2025, including the apparent correlation breakdown, the growing political overhang weighing on the , and what’s currently priced for both the Fed and BoJ in the second half of the year.
Correlations: Drivers Go Missing
Source: TradingView
What stands out from the recent data is the clear deterioration in correlation strength between USD/JPY and its traditional macro inputs. Looking across one-month and one-quarter rolling periods, there’s been little to no sustained relationship between the pair and major variables including U.S. Treasury yields, yield differentials, and broader risk appetite proxies like the and .
This divergence suggests markets are no longer trading the pair in a textbook fashion. Despite notable moves in both and yields over Q2, the pair has largely ignored these developments. Even front-end spread changes, typically a reliable driver of JPY flows, have failed to generate a lasting directional pull. , often used as a barometer for inflation and demand dynamics, has also shown negligible influence.
Instead, what seems to be playing a larger role is a rotation out of the triggered by growing political unease. The turning point appears to have been the announcement of reciprocal tariffs on U.S. goods during U.S. ‘Liberation Day’ in early April. Since then, longer-dated U.S. Treasury yields have risen relative to short-dated yields, pointing to an increase in term premium—a concept that refers to the additional yield investors demand to hold longer-term bonds given uncertainty around inflation, growth, and fiscal stability.
Source: TradingView
Importantly, this lift in term premium hasn’t supported the dollar. If anything, it’s coincided with growing distrust from offshore buyers and rising concerns around the sustainability of the U.S. fiscal trajectory. Charts of real (inflation-adjusted) yields on 10 (blue line, 20 (red line), and (black line) show the shift clearly. With 20 and 30-year TIPS now well above levels seen for most of the past decade, it suggests investors are demanding greater compensation for long-term risk.
Given U.S. potential growth is broadly seen at around 1.8%, current real yields imply markets are not only reacting to fiscal slippage but also pricing in more structural uncertainty, likely tied to concerns about governance and trade under the Trump administration.
Fed: Policy Path Hazy Amid Political Overhang
While real yields at the long end of the curve remain elevated, the front end has moved in the opposite direction. Softer inflation prints and patchy consumer data through Q2 have led to a modest dovish repricing for the Fed, with markets now assigning a decent chance to three rate cuts before the end of the year.
The bigger risk factor, though, stems from politics. Reports suggest President Trump may name a shadow Federal Reserve chair well in advance of Jerome Powell’s term expiring in May 2026.
The move could effectively undermine the independence of monetary policy in the near term, especially if the nominee signals a preference for materially lower interest rates. While Powell remains in place for now, markets are increasingly sensitive to any commentary suggesting a new policy direction is already taking shape behind the scenes.
In short, artificially low interest rates are no longer a hypothetical—they’re a growing market concern. For now, , , and remain key for the Fed outlook, but the political backdrop could start to exert more weight on rate expectations as H2 progresses.
Source: Bloomberg
BoJ: Tariff Shadow Lingers Over Policy Normalisation
The BoJ remains in a difficult position. Had it not been for growing trade-related uncertainty, there’s a strong case it would already have hiked beyond the 25bp move delivered in January. Inflation pressures remain firm, with annual core readings still sitting well above target. Domestic wage growth has also remained robust, supported by another round of sizeable increases struck earlier this year.
Despite that, markets remain hesitant to price in a meaningful tightening cycle, reflecting the cloud hanging over Japanese export prospects. With the reciprocal tariff extension set to expire on July 9, the key variable may be whether Japan can extract a deal from the U.S. that limits the damage to its auto sector.
At this stage, 25% tariffs on Japanese car imports remain in place, and without movement there, the BoJ may be reluctant to hike again. A global slowdown triggered by retaliatory trade actions would quickly reverse progress made on domestic inflation.
Still, markets remain split, with current pricing assigning roughly a 50/50 chance of a second rate hike before year-end. Should the trade overhang lift—or a deal be struck that shields Japan’s key export sectors—the BoJ may feel more confident acting again. That could reintroduce rate differentials as a driver of USD/JPY, but we’re not there yet.
US Dollar Index (DXY) Doldrums
Source: TradingView
The (DXY) has been under sustained pressure since reciprocal tariff rates were announced on U.S. Liberation Day, printing a string of lower highs and lower lows within a broader downtrend on the weekly timeframe. With a bearish key reversal candle printing in the last full week of Q2—sending the DXY tumbling through support at 97.70—it signals the dollar could lose even more ground in the early stages of H2.
Momentum indicators bolster this view with RSI (14) trending lower while sitting in deeply negative territory. MACD is doing the same, confirming the overwhelming bearish signal that favours downside over upside.
With the DXY trading below 97.70, the next downside levels to watch include 94.65 and 91.60. 97.70 may now revert to acting as resistance, with 100 and 101.90 other topside levels of note.
USD/JPY Technical Outlook
Source: TradingView
While USD/JPY trades lower than when the Q2 outlook was completed, the story over recent months has been one of modest upside with support running from the April lows continuing to repel bearish moves in May and June. On the topside, sellers have been parked above 148, resulting in violent downside moves, including in late June. That price action may be informative as to what direction USD/JPY is likely to break from the ascending triangle it trades in.
Even though momentum indicators like RSI (14) and MACD are signalling that selling pressure is ebbing—not increasing—downside risks remain tilted lower entering H2, keeping the risk of a potential retest of support starting from 140.25 on the table.
Should we see a weekly close beneath 140.25, it would increase the risk of a move towards major support at 138.00. Below, 134.00, 129.65 and 127.00 are the levels to watch. Should sellers parked between 148.00–70 be eventually overrun, resistance levels of note include 151.00 and 153.38.
The colour-coding signifies the potential ranges where USD/JPY may finish 2025, along with an assigned probability of each occurring as marked. The green zone between 148.00 on the topside and 138.00 on the downside is favoured at 70%, underpinned by the belief that while broader USD pressure is likely to persist, in the absence of a major U.S. market meltdown that sparks major carry trade unwind or significant economic downturn (both of which screen as unlikely over the medium term), a venture into the blue zone is deemed low probability at just 20%.
The implied probability of a push above 148 is even lower at just 10%, likely requiring a combination of policy inertia from the Fed, a positive resolution to trade and geopolitical risks, along with booming financial markets. Such a backdrop comes across as more akin to wishful thinking rather than plausible.
Original Post (NYSE:)
