The main category of All News Articles.
You can use the search box below to find what you need.
[wd_asp id=1]
The main category of All News Articles.
You can use the search box below to find what you need.
[wd_asp id=1]
Cardano (ADA) continues to trade under pressure as technical weakness on lower timeframes contrasts with fresh signals from its development ecosystem. On the 4-hour chart, ADA remains stuck in a short-term downtrend, reflecting cautious sentiment across the broader crypto market. Price action shows sellers controlling rebounds, while buyers struggle to reclaim key technical levels.
ADA trades near $0.36 after repeated failures to regain momentum following its mid-December peak. The 4-hour structure shows consistent lower highs and lower lows, confirming a b…
Read The Full Article Cardano Price Prediction: ADA Faces Pressure as Developers Push Midnight Expansion On Coin Edition.
December 25, 2025 — Silver prices are pausing near historic highs on Christmas Day, after a blistering year-end rally pushed spot silver into fresh record territory. With many major financial markets shut or running on holiday-thin liquidity, today’s price action is less about fresh positioning and more about consolidation — but the bigger story is that silver has entered what several analysts describe as “price discovery” after breaking multi-year resistance and posting one of its strongest years on record. [1]
Spot silver was around $71.9 per ounce on December 25, 2025, according to TradingEconomics, effectively flat on the day and just below the latest all-time highs logged this week. [2]
That “just below” matters: Reuters reported silver hit an all-time high near $72.70 before easing back toward $71.94 in a modest pullback described as profit-taking after a record run. [3]
Futures snapshots tell a similar holiday story. Investing.com listed silver futures around $71.875 with volume shown as 0—a reminder that Christmas conditions can freeze normal trading and make “today’s” levels look static until liquidity returns. [4]
The dominant macro driver behind precious metals’ year-end surge has been the market’s conviction that U.S. monetary policy will keep easing. Reuters noted the Federal Reserve cut rates three times in 2025, and traders were pricing two more cuts next year—a classic supportive backdrop for non-yielding assets like gold and silver. [5]
Other Reuters reporting through the week echoed the same theme: softer labor and inflation signals bolstered the case for additional rate cuts, while analysts highlighted that silver has been “leading” gold at points during the rally. [6]
A weaker dollar typically makes dollar-priced commodities more attractive to non-U.S. buyers. Reuters described the dollar as having slumped significantly in 2025, helping to power the precious-metals surge. [7]
Silver is unusual because it straddles two roles: a precious metal with safe-haven appeal and a critical industrial input. Reuters coverage tied the precious-metals rally to rising geopolitical tensions and trade-related uncertainty, including developments linked to Venezuela. [8]
Multiple analysts point to the same structural issue underneath the rally: silver has been running a deficit for years, and physical tightness has become harder to ignore as prices climb.
In a market like silver — smaller than gold and increasingly demanded by industry — persistent deficits can create the kind of “air pocket” dynamics that turn rallies into breakouts.
Silver’s industrial profile is central to the bullish thesis because it links the metal to long-duration themes like electrification and data infrastructure.
ING emphasized that industrial demand accounts for more than half of total silver consumption, and while solar growth may slow after peak installation years in China, demand tailwinds remain from electrification, grid upgrades, and increased silver content in automotive components (including hybrids and EVs). [11]
IG’s 2026 outlook went further, arguing demand remains broad-based across solar, EVs, semiconductors, 5G, and AI-related power infrastructure, while also highlighting how hard substitution can be in performance-sensitive applications. [12]
Reuters also framed silver’s “perfect storm” as a blend of investment demand and the industrial pull from AI data centers, solar, and EVs, with momentum buying layered on top. [13]
Holiday sessions hide volatility — but they don’t remove the deeper plumbing issues that can whip silver around when markets reopen.
ING flagged a set of conditions that help explain why silver can spike or gap more aggressively than gold:
Reuters reporting earlier in the month also linked tariff concerns to physical dislocations and liquidity stress in the London spot market, reinforcing the idea that silver’s rally is not purely “paper-driven.” [15]
Forecasts for silver in 2026 are wide — and that dispersion is itself a signal. Silver is historically volatile, and analysts are splitting into two camps: “bank-base-case” pricing and “breakout-extension” pricing.
This is a critical takeaway for readers: even relatively “measured” forecasts still imply silver stays far above the levels that defined most of the pre-breakout decade.
Several market professionals quoted in Reuters pointed to $75 as a psychologically and technically important milestone:
IG outlined a more technical pathway: once silver cleared the long-term ceiling and held above it, the next measured-move extensions in their framework pointed to $72 and $88. [21]
One nuance here is timing: silver is already flirting with the low-$70s zone now. That means the “$72” area is no longer a distant projection — it’s becoming a near-term battleground where traders will judge whether the breakout is consolidating or exhausting.
Silver’s outperformance has also shown up in the gold-silver ratio, a long-followed measure of how many ounces of silver it takes to buy one ounce of gold.
Reuters reported the gold-silver ratio narrowed to around 64 from about 105 in April, reflecting how aggressively silver has caught up during the year-end sprint. [22]
IG noted that long-run historical averages are often discussed in the 40–60 zone, and argued that further compression would imply additional relative strength for silver — even if gold prices merely hold steady. [23]
Because today is holiday-thinned, most technical notes are anchored to the last “normal” session’s close and framed as setups for when markets reopen.
From a news-reader standpoint, the technical message is straightforward: the uptrend remains intact above the low-$70s/high-$60s supports, but the market is extended enough that sharp pullbacks are possible — especially once liquidity returns and year-end portfolio rebalancing resumes.
India is a key demand center for physical silver, and local-market commentary has turned increasingly bullish.
The Times of India highlighted analyst commentary pointing to a breakout structure in MCX Silver, with support near 215,000 and an upside target around 240,000 (pricing in rupees terms on the exchange). [26]
Even for global readers who don’t trade MCX, this matters because India’s import demand and retail participation can influence physical flows — a theme Reuters has also referenced in discussing drivers of silver’s record highs. [27]
As of December 25, 2025, silver is consolidating near $72/oz, after printing fresh records and capping a year defined by falling-rate expectations, a weaker dollar, geopolitical risk, and a widely cited multi-year supply deficit. [33]
For 2026, mainstream forecasts cluster around the mid-to-high $50s on average (with upside cases), while several strategists continue to flag $75 as a plausible milestone if macro tailwinds and physical tightness persist. [34]
The caution is embedded in the same story: silver’s market structure and dual-demand profile make it prone to steep corrections, especially when positioning gets crowded — meaning the next leg up, if it comes, may not be a straight line. [35]
This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute investment advice.
1. tradingeconomics.com, 2. tradingeconomics.com, 3. www.reuters.com, 4. www.investing.com, 5. www.reuters.com, 6. www.reuters.com, 7. www.reuters.com, 8. www.reuters.com, 9. www.reuters.com, 10. silverinstitute.org, 11. think.ing.com, 12. www.ig.com, 13. www.reuters.com, 14. think.ing.com, 15. www.reuters.com, 16. www.reuters.com, 17. www.ig.com, 18. www.reuters.com, 19. www.reuters.com, 20. www.reuters.com, 21. www.ig.com, 22. www.reuters.com, 23. www.ig.com, 24. www.fxempire.com, 25. www.fxleaders.com, 26. timesofindia.indiatimes.com, 27. www.reuters.com, 28. www.reuters.com, 29. www.reuters.com, 30. www.reuters.com, 31. think.ing.com, 32. think.ing.com, 33. tradingeconomics.com, 34. www.reuters.com, 35. www.reuters.com
XRP price action is staying surprisingly active for Christmas Day, even as many markets are operating with thinner liquidity and lighter participation. As of the latest available data on December 25, 2025, XRP is trading around $1.87, modestly higher on the day after dipping and rebounding back into the mid‑$1.80s. [1]
The bigger story isn’t a sudden breakout—it’s the growing tension between institutional-style demand (via newly launched U.S. spot XRP ETFs) and a spot price that remains stuck in a narrow range, with multiple outlets pointing to key levels around $1.77 (support) and $1.98 (resistance) as the near-term “decision zone.” [2]
Below is a full roundup of today’s (25.12.2025) XRP news, forecasts, and market analyses, plus what they imply for the next few sessions.
Market pricing late on Dec. 25 shows XRP hovering around $1.87, after an intraday move that included a pullback and quick recovery. [3]
Trading coverage on the day described XRP spending much of the session around the $1.86 area, dipping, and then being pushed back toward $1.87—a “green on Christmas” narrative driven more by a rebound than by a trend change. [4]
One important nuance: some same-day analyses referenced XRP closer to the $1.80 region (often because they’re framing a support test rather than the latest tick). That difference is typical on volatile days, and it underscores why traders are treating the current tape as a range market, not a breakout. [5]
Across the day’s reporting and analysis, three themes keep repeating:
Multiple Dec. 25 writeups point to continued ETF demand as a supportive backdrop, with combined inflows reported around $1.13B and assets under management above $1.2B (figures cited in market commentary). [6]
At least one widely circulated headline framing today is blunt: ETF assets have climbed toward/above ~$1.25B, but XRP price has “stalled” in its trading range. [7]
That divergence matters because it suggests one (or more) of the following may be happening simultaneously:
One of today’s most concrete micro-signals came from liquidation data cited in market coverage: in a one-hour window, liquidations skewed heavily toward shorts, consistent with a quick dip being bought and sellers getting squeezed out. [8]
This doesn’t automatically translate into a sustained rally—but it helps explain why XRP can look “flat” on the day while still producing tradable intraday swings.
A Dec. 25 analysis piece highlighted “fear zone” conditions for XRP sentiment (attributed to Santiment) and argued that extreme negativity has historically coincided with stabilization and rebounds in some instances. [9]
That same analysis also cited on-chain exchange supply dynamics: XRP balances on Binance were described as falling to their lowest level since July 2024, which—if accurate—can reduce immediate sell pressure and amplify price sensitivity to incremental demand. [10]
Whether you’re bullish or bearish, it’s hard to cover XRP in late 2025 without acknowledging that U.S. spot XRP ETF launches changed the market structure—creating a regulated on-ramp for allocators who won’t custody tokens directly.
A quick snapshot of the key products and launches frequently referenced in XRP coverage:
The market’s immediate takeaway from today’s coverage: ETFs can generate steady demand without instantly “fixing” price action—especially when broader crypto sentiment is weak and technical overhead resistance remains heavy. [16]
While exact levels vary by analyst and timeframe, today’s most repeated zones are remarkably consistent across outlets:
Put simply, today’s technical commentary paints a market where:
One of the more detailed Dec. 25 analyses pointed to cautious whale adding across two large-holder cohorts, estimating roughly $200 million worth of net additions based on changes in wallet cohort balances over the prior few days. [25]
The tone of that analysis is important: it does not claim aggressive accumulation. Instead, it frames whale behavior as a supportive “tailwind” that could help a reversal if price confirms by clearing resistance levels. [26]
Separately, the “exchange reserves down” angle—especially focused on Binance balances—has been used today as an argument that sell-side supply may be tightening. [27]
A recurring debate in XRP coverage today is the gap between Ripple’s ecosystem milestones and XRP’s token performance.
One widely distributed finance piece noted that Ripple has processed $95B in payments, while also arguing that XRP’s 2025 price performance shows adoption metrics and token price don’t always move in lockstep. [28]
This line of thinking matches a broader theme you’ll see in many XRP discussions: even if Ripple’s payments and infrastructure business expands, XRP’s price still depends on market structure, liquidity, regulatory framing, and how much of that activity meaningfully translates into sustained XRP demand.
Forecasts are not guarantees—especially in crypto—but today’s “prediction stack” is useful because it shows where expectations cluster.
One widely referenced monthly forecast projected XRP could end December 2025 around $1.87, with a band near $1.82–$1.87. [31]
This is notable because it aligns with what traders are seeing on the chart: price action compressing near a decision area, with neither side convincingly breaking control.
Some of today’s most viral XRP content isn’t classic technical analysis—it’s scenario modeling based on institutional adoption narratives.
A Dec. 25 commentary framed Japan as a potential first “full-scale institutional use case” for XRP due to FX volatility and existing Ripple-linked relationships (notably SBI). It laid out scenario ranges such as $3–$5 (base), $8–$12 (optimistic), and $15+ (aggressive)—explicitly presented as modeled paths, not forecasts. [32]
Another Dec. 25 piece suggested that after retail-driven ETF demand, the “next phase” could involve pension funds and insurers, and it included chatbot-based scenario math (for example, hypothetical $10B–$20B incremental inflows and “multiplier effect” logic). This is inherently speculative, but it’s clearly part of today’s XRP discourse. [33]
For a Google News–style framing, the key takeaway is: the narrative bid for XRP is increasingly institutional, but the market still wants confirmation in the form of price reclaiming major resistance levels.
Even on a holiday, XRP’s price is trading inside a 2025 context shaped by regulation and market access.
Earlier in 2025, Reuters reported the SEC dropped its appeal in the long-running Ripple case, following a district court decision (a milestone frequently cited as part of the “regulatory clarity” arc around XRP). [34]
And Reuters also covered Ripple-backed Evernorth’s plan to raise over $1B via a Nasdaq listing to build an XRP-focused treasury strategy—another example of crypto’s growing integration with public-market structures. [35]
Those aren’t “Dec. 25 breaking news” items, but they help explain why spot XRP ETFs exist in late 2025 and why institutional flows are now a daily part of the XRP market conversation.
If you’re tracking XRP into the final days of 2025, today’s coverage suggests a practical checklist:
On Dec. 25, 2025, XRP is not “doing nothing.” It’s compressing—with price near $1.87, sentiment described as deeply negative in parts of the market, and a steady flow of ETF-driven institutional interest building underneath the chart. [40]
That combination is exactly what fuels the current debate: whether XRP is quietly building a base ahead of a reclaim of the $2 handle—or whether overhead resistance and weak risk appetite keep it trapped (or push it lower) into year-end.
The next decisive move likely hinges less on Christmas-day candles and more on whether XRP can defend $1.77 and break $1.98 in the sessions that follow. [41]
1. u.today, 2. beincrypto.com, 3. u.today, 4. u.today, 5. www.fxleaders.com, 6. www.fxleaders.com, 7. www.mexc.co, 8. u.today, 9. www.fxleaders.com, 10. www.fxleaders.com, 11. www.etf.com, 12. bitwiseinvestments.com, 13. www.franklintempleton.com, 14. etfs.grayscale.com, 15. www.21shares.com, 16. www.fxleaders.com, 17. beincrypto.com, 18. www.fxleaders.com, 19. www.fxleaders.com, 20. beincrypto.com, 21. beincrypto.com, 22. www.fxleaders.com, 23. beincrypto.com, 24. beincrypto.com, 25. beincrypto.com, 26. beincrypto.com, 27. www.fxleaders.com, 28. finance.yahoo.com, 29. www.binance.com, 30. coincodex.com, 31. changelly.com, 32. thecryptobasic.com, 33. thecryptobasic.com, 34. www.reuters.com, 35. www.reuters.com, 36. beincrypto.com, 37. beincrypto.com, 38. www.fxleaders.com, 39. www.fxleaders.com, 40. www.fxleaders.com, 41. beincrypto.com
December 25, 2025 — Gold is entering the Christmas break near historic highs after a dramatic late‑year surge that pushed the metal through the psychological $4,500 per ounce level and up to fresh records earlier this week. In holiday-thinned conditions, spot gold has been hovering around the mid‑$4,400s to ~$4,480, following an intraday record near $4,525 set during Christmas Eve trading. [1]
The bigger story, however, is not just “gold price today” — it’s why the rally has been so relentless into year-end, and what major banks and market strategists think happens next in 2026, with forecasts clustering from the low‑$4,000s to $5,000+ depending on interest rates, the U.S. dollar, geopolitics, and the pace of central‑bank and ETF buying. [2]
Gold trading is typically quieter around Christmas, and this year is no exception: liquidity has been thin and the market is pausing after a powerful run. Spot gold was last reported around $4,479 in the final active session before Christmas Day, after touching a record near $4,525 earlier in the day; U.S. gold futures were also around $4,481 in that session. [3]
Several market updates published on Dec. 25 describe gold as “steady” or “stabilizing” after the breakout above $4,500, with traders starting to lock in gains as the year closes. [4]
Gold’s late‑2025 rally is being powered by a rare alignment of macro and structural forces — some of which are cyclical (rates, the dollar), and some of which look longer‑lasting (central bank diversification, ETF flows, and a broadened investor base).
Gold tends to benefit when markets expect easier monetary policy, because bullion doesn’t pay interest — so falling yields reduce the opportunity cost of holding it. Reuters reporting this week highlighted that markets have been pricing in additional U.S. rate cuts in 2026, supporting gold’s appeal. [5]
A softer dollar can mechanically support gold (priced in dollars) by making it cheaper for non‑U.S. buyers. Reuters has noted the dollar’s notable decline in 2025 and the view among many investors that weakness could extend into 2026 — one reason precious metals demand has remained strong into the holiday period. [6]
Safe‑haven buying has been repeatedly cited as a catalyst in the latest leg higher, including tensions linked to the Middle East, uncertainty around Ukraine‑Russia dynamics, and the recent focus on U.S. actions tied to Venezuelan tankers. [7]
Beyond day‑to‑day headlines, broader policy uncertainty has become part of the gold narrative. Financial Times’ year‑in‑review framing points to tariff turmoil and market instability as major themes of 2025, with gold a standout beneficiary amid a “gold rush” driven by central banks and retail investors. [8]
If rate expectations and geopolitics explain the timing of the latest surge, the foundation of this bull market is increasingly described as structural.
Reuters reporting on the year-end rally cited Metals Focus estimates that central banks are on track to buy about 850 tonnes of gold in 2025 (down from 2024 but still sizable), and analysts expect elevated official-sector demand to remain a key pillar into 2026. [9]
In a separate Reuters deep dive on “what fuels the market,” the same structural theme comes through: gold’s surge has been linked to robust central‑bank buying and diversification trends alongside rate-cut bets and safe-haven flows. [10]
Gold ETFs have also reasserted themselves as a major demand channel:
That ETF persistence matters for price: it signals institutional and retail participation beyond short-term “fear trades,” reinforcing the idea that gold is increasingly treated as a strategic allocation rather than a tactical hedge. [13]
The week’s price behavior has looked like a classic “breakout then breathe” pattern.
One widely cited technical takeaway: even after the pullback, gold remains in a powerful uptrend, and some market commentary continues to flag the potential for another leg higher once liquidity returns after the holiday lull. [17]
Gold’s global surge is showing up in local markets too. In India, Business Standard reported sharp moves in domestic bullion prices on Dec. 25, with 24K gold (10 grams) quoted around ₹1,38,940 and 22K gold (10 grams) around ₹1,27,330, alongside a jump in silver prices. [18]
This divergence between soaring investment demand and pressured jewelry demand is also consistent with Metals Focus commentary cited by Reuters: high prices have weighed on jewelry consumption in India even as bar-and-coin investment has held up better. [19]
The most important question for investors heading into 2026 is whether gold’s extraordinary 2025 performance sets up a correction — or whether the rally is simply shifting into a slower, higher‑plateau phase.
Here’s what major published forecasts and analyst notes are saying right now:
Goldman Sachs sees gold rising to $4,900/oz by December 2026 in its base case, driven by structurally high central bank demand and cyclical support from U.S. Fed rate cuts — with potential upside if private-investor diversification broadens. [20]
J.P. Morgan has been among the most prominent bulls. Reuters reported the bank forecasting gold could average $5,055/oz by Q4 2026, with assumptions that investor demand and central bank buying average around 566 tonnes per quarter in 2026. The same Reuters report also reiterated J.P. Morgan’s longer-term target of $6,000/oz by 2028. [21]
A separate Reuters analysis on 2026 forecasting also grouped J.P. Morgan with Bank of America and Metals Focus in seeing $5,000 as reachable in 2026, even if the pace of gains slows compared with 2025. [22]
Reuters’ Dec. 17 survey-style reporting captured how dispersed the outlook is:
Meanwhile, some media summaries published this week note that several banks broadly cluster expectations for 2026 trading in the $4,500–$4,700 zone, with upside scenarios toward $5,000 if macro uncertainty remains elevated. [27]
Even gold bulls are increasingly careful about one thing: after a 60–70% year, volatility cuts both ways.
The main downside risks highlighted across current reporting include:
In short: the structural story may be supportive, but the path is unlikely to be smooth.
Once full liquidity returns after the holidays, the gold market is likely to refocus on a clear set of catalysts:
As of Dec. 25, 2025, the gold price narrative is best described as strong trend, cautious tape: bulls still have the structural wind at their back (central banks + ETFs + diversification), but the market is also digesting an extraordinary year and heading into the new one with a wider forecast dispersion than usual — from “cool-off” scenarios in the low‑$4,000s to “new regime” calls at $5,000+. [37]
If you want, I can rewrite this in a more “wire-style” Google News format (shorter paragraphs, more attribution in-line, and a tighter nut graf) while keeping the same facts and SEO focus.
1. www.reuters.com, 2. www.reuters.com, 3. www.reuters.com, 4. www.fxleaders.com, 5. www.reuters.com, 6. www.reuters.com, 7. www.reuters.com, 8. www.ft.com, 9. www.reuters.com, 10. www.reuters.com, 11. www.reuters.com, 12. www.gold.org, 13. www.gold.org, 14. www.reuters.com, 15. www.investing.com, 16. www.fxleaders.com, 17. www.reuters.com, 18. www.business-standard.com, 19. www.reuters.com, 20. www.reuters.com, 21. www.reuters.com, 22. www.reuters.com, 23. www.reuters.com, 24. www.reuters.com, 25. www.reuters.com, 26. www.reuters.com, 27. www.businessinsider.com, 28. www.reuters.com, 29. www.reuters.com, 30. www.reuters.com, 31. www.reuters.com, 32. www.reuters.com, 33. www.reuters.com, 34. www.reuters.com, 35. www.gold.org, 36. www.reuters.com, 37. www.reuters.com
Law enforcement officers have uncovered new episodes concerning the activities of a criminal group that terrorized elderly residents of Ukraine with threats of prosecution for refusing to buy biologically active additives (BAAs – ed). The perpetrators were detained in early 2025: during the pre-trial investigation, law enforcement officers established new facts and identified other involved individuals. This was reported by UNN with reference to the National Police of Ukraine.
According to the investigation, members of the group used databases of individuals who had previously ordered medicines, after which they called the victims, introducing themselves as employees of the state executive service.
Under the pretext of “mandatory receipt of medicines,” the perpetrators exerted psychological pressure, threatened legal proceedings and confiscation of property if they refused to pick up the parcel at post offices. For mass calling of citizens, the defendants used IP telephony, which allowed them to conceal their real location and scale their criminal activities.
Currently, law enforcement officers have documented a hundred new episodes of the fraudsters’ criminal activity.
Within the framework of the criminal proceedings, 21 individuals – residents of Dnipropetrovsk and Kyiv regions – aged 17 to 44, have been notified of suspicion. The perpetrators are charged with creating, leading, and participating in a criminal organization (Part 1, 2 of Article 255), as well as extortion committed by a criminal organization (Part 4 of Article 28, Part 4 of Article 189 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine). A series of searches were conducted at the places of residence of the group members in Dnipropetrovsk, Kyiv, and Zaporizhzhia regions.
Law enforcement officers uncovered a scheme for legalizing over 578 million hryvnias obtained from defense contracts. Enterprise officials acted in collusion with a “conversion center,” withdrawing budget funds through forged documents.
Alvin Lang
Dec 25, 2025 09:55
MATIC price prediction suggests potential 32% rally to $0.50 as Polygon technical analysis reveals oversold conditions near $0.35 support with medium-term targets of $0.45-$0.58.
Polygon’s MATIC token is positioned at a critical juncture as technical indicators suggest a potential recovery phase after testing key support levels. With the current price hovering around $0.38, our comprehensive MATIC price prediction analysis reveals both immediate opportunities and risks for traders considering their next move.
• MATIC short-term target (1 week): $0.42 (+11% from current levels)
• Polygon medium-term forecast (1 month): $0.45-$0.50 range (18-32% upside potential)
• Key level to break for bullish continuation: $0.58 (critical resistance)
• Critical support if bearish: $0.35 (immediate) / $0.33 (strong support)
The latest analyst sentiment around MATIC reveals a cautiously optimistic outlook. Recent predictions from Blockchain.News have consistently highlighted the $0.45-$0.58 range as achievable targets, with December 24th analysis suggesting an 18-32% rally potential as MATIC approaches the critical $0.42 resistance level.
The consensus among analysts points to a medium-confidence Polygon forecast that depends heavily on breaking through the $0.58 resistance zone. What’s particularly noteworthy is the consistency in targeting the $0.45-$0.50 range across multiple predictions, suggesting this MATIC price target has strong technical backing rather than speculative optimism.
Contrarian views remain focused on the downside risk if the $0.35 support fails to hold, which would invalidate the current bullish thesis and potentially send MATIC toward the $0.33 strong support level.
The current Polygon technical analysis presents a mixed but increasingly constructive picture. With MATIC trading at $0.38, the token sits just above the 7-day SMA of $0.37, indicating short-term stability despite recent weakness.
The RSI reading of 38.00 positions MATIC in neutral territory with room for upward movement before reaching overbought conditions. This supports our MATIC price prediction for near-term recovery potential. However, the MACD histogram at -0.0045 continues to show bearish momentum, suggesting any rally may face initial resistance.
Key technical factors supporting recovery include MATIC’s position within the Bollinger Bands at 0.29, indicating the token is trading closer to the lower band ($0.31) than the upper band ($0.56). This oversold positioning often precedes corrective rallies, particularly when combined with the current support holding at $0.35.
Volume analysis shows moderate activity at $1.07 million on Binance spot, which needs to increase significantly to confirm any breakout above the immediate resistance at $0.42.
The primary MATIC price target in the bullish scenario centers on the $0.50 level, representing a 32% gain from current prices. This target aligns with the 50-day SMA at $0.45, which often acts as dynamic resistance during recovery phases.
For this bullish case to materialize, MATIC needs to decisively break above the immediate resistance at $0.42 (20-day SMA) on increased volume. A successful break would likely trigger momentum toward $0.45, with the ultimate target of $0.58 representing the key resistance level that could unlock further gains toward the upper Bollinger Band at $0.56.
The technical setup supports this Polygon forecast as the Stochastic indicators (%K at 25.19, %D at 19.74) suggest MATIC is approaching oversold levels, creating conditions for a technical bounce.
The bearish scenario becomes active if MATIC fails to hold the $0.35 support level. A break below this critical support would target the strong support at $0.33, representing a 13% decline from current levels.
Risk factors include the bearish MACD momentum and the significant distance from the 200-day SMA at $0.69, indicating the longer-term trend remains challenged. Additionally, any broader crypto market weakness could pressure MATIC below key support levels regardless of individual technical factors.
Based on our analysis, the decision to buy or sell MATIC depends on risk tolerance and entry timing. Conservative investors should wait for a confirmed break above $0.42 with increased volume before considering entry.
For those willing to accept higher risk, current levels around $0.38 offer an attractive risk-reward ratio with a stop-loss at $0.34 (just below the $0.35 support). This provides approximately 3% downside risk against potential 18-32% upside to our target range.
Position sizing should account for MATIC’s daily ATR of $0.03, indicating moderate volatility that could provide both opportunities and risks for shorter-term traders.
Our MATIC price prediction targets a recovery to the $0.45-$0.50 range within the next 4-6 weeks, representing 18-32% upside potential from current levels. This Polygon forecast carries medium confidence based on technical indicators showing oversold conditions and analyst consensus around similar price targets.
Key indicators to monitor include RSI movement above 45 for momentum confirmation, MACD histogram turning positive, and most critically, a volume-supported break above the $0.42 resistance level. Failure to hold $0.35 support would invalidate this bullish thesis and require reassessment of the prediction timeline.
The prediction timeline extends through late January 2026, with initial confirmation signals expected within the next 1-2 weeks as MATIC either breaks resistance or tests lower support levels.
Image source: Shutterstock
Updated: December 25, 2025
Natural gas markets are spending Christmas Day in holiday mode—with many European venues closed and U.S. trading thinned out—yet the underlying story is anything but quiet: weather-driven demand risk is rising into late December, LNG flows remain a decisive swing factor, and storage levels on both sides of the Atlantic are back in focus.
The cleanest “real-time” read on Europe came in the final pre-holiday session: by 10:21 GMT, the benchmark Dutch TTF front-month was €28.20/MWh (about $9.75/mmBtu), modestly higher as traders priced the possibility that a colder spell could lift heating demand. [1]
At the same time, the calendar matters. ICE Endex (one of Europe’s key trading venues for energy derivatives) lists December 25 and 26, 2025 as closed for Christmas, which helps explain why price discovery is concentrated in the sessions immediately before the holiday break. [2]
In the U.S., the most-watched benchmark—NYMEX Henry Hub natural gas futures—saw volatile, thin pre-holiday trading in the last session before Christmas. The front-month January contract ended down 16.6 cents at $4.242/mmBtu, after touching $4.593 earlier in the session (a near two-week high). [3]
And in global LNG, the key price signal from Asia ticked higher: spot LNG for February delivery into Northeast Asia was assessed around $9.60/mmBtu, up slightly on the week, with South Korea emerging as a notable marginal buyer amid colder forecasts. [4]
Here’s what the market was signaling around the 10:21 GMT reference point on the last liquid pre-holiday session:
Holiday sessions often exaggerate price moves—both up and down—because fewer participants are active, and small order flow can push benchmarks more than usual. That dynamic showed up clearly in the U.S., where market participants pointed to lower holiday liquidity as a contributor to volatility. [8]
Two regions matter most for near-term price direction:
Europe: The late-December outlook was described as “bullish” by an LSEG analyst in the pre-holiday European session, with expectations for higher consumption in Germany and France due to a “steep drop in temperature” over the Christmas period. [9]
United States: Meteorologists cited in the U.S. market report expected a slight nationwide cooling trend through January 8, with heating degree days rising from 358 to 377 day-on-day (still below the “normal” level of 447, but moving in the direction that tends to support demand). [10]
One reason U.S. natural gas has stayed sensitive to any incremental cold signal is that LNG exports are pulling a large, steady volume of gas out of the domestic system.
That matters because, in winter, the U.S. market’s “balancing lever” is often storage. If exports are strong and a cold stretch hits, prices can gap quickly—especially around contract expiry and holiday schedules.
Europe entered winter with solid inventories, but the drawdown pace is now the story.
The takeaway isn’t the second decimal place—it’s that storage is no longer “comfortably high,” which raises sensitivity to cold snaps, unplanned outages, and pipeline/LNG flow surprises.
Even though ICE Endex lists Dec. 25–26 as closed (meaning fewer fresh reference trades), the last traded levels still anchor commercial decisions—especially in LNG.
In practice, this “price anchor” effect often shifts attention to:
Pre-holiday reporting also emphasized that strong LNG supply and Norwegian pipeline flows were expected to counter some of the cold-driven demand risk. [15]
U.S. natural gas is also wrestling with a calendar issue: the January contract is near expiration, and liquidity can migrate toward the next prompt month.
In the final pre-holiday session:
LSEG’s demand projections cited in the same report pointed to a step-up in total Lower-48 demand (including exports) from 127.9 Bcf/d this week to 136.4 Bcf/d over the next two weeks. [18]
Separately, Texas—one of the most critical producing regions—has been emphasizing operational scrutiny. The Texas Railroad Commission said it is stepping up inspections of natural gas storage facilities, noting that Texas storage volumes were at a record level as of late November. [19]
Asia spot LNG prices edged up as colder weather forecasts boosted near-term interest in South Korea:
Even with that uptick, the broader theme remains: spot prices in Asia are far below early-2025 levels, reflecting weaker underlying buying. [22]
The same Reuters-based LNG report highlighted a key setup: with Asia and North Africa showing limited appetite for spot volumes in early Q1, incremental LNG supply is expected to flow disproportionately into Europe. [23]
That’s one reason European gas can stay relatively stable—even with colder weather—as long as LNG continues to show up on time and Norway runs smoothly.
Two Russia-related themes stood out in today’s reporting:
1) Russia’s LNG expansion timeline is slipping. Deputy Prime Minister Alexander Novak said Russia has delayed its 100 million tons/year LNG output target by several years due to Western sanctions. Updated strategy figures referenced output of 90–105 million tons by 2030 and 110–130 million tons by 2036, while Russia’s current LNG share was described around 8% with an ambition of 20% by 2030–2035. [24]
2) Trade flows are being watched closely. Reuters separately reported that a tanker named Kunpeng loaded LNG from Russia’s Portovaya facility—under U.S. sanctions—and that it had previously delivered a Portovaya cargo to China’s Beihai terminal earlier this month, based on ship-tracking data. [25]
Add in deal-making: Malaysia’s Petronas signed a 10-year LNG supply deal with China’s CNOOC for 1 million metric tons per year, reinforcing Asia’s long-term contracting trend even as spot markets remain subdued. [26]
If you’re looking for the official U.S. storage update, note the calendar shift:
That means the market will lean more heavily on private estimates and weather-driven demand models in the interim.
A Dec. 25 analysis on Investing.com projected a -158 Bcf withdrawal for the week ending Dec. 19, which would put inventories at 3,420 Bcf, described as 125 Bcf below 2024 and 70 Bcf under the five-year average. [28]
Treat this as an estimate, not official data—but it matches the broader narrative: storage is tightening, and the market is more weather-sensitive.
A Dec. 25 technical forecast from FXEmpire framed natural gas near $4.25 as the “Wednesday closing price” reference into the holiday shutdown, highlighting nearby resistance levels and a market still sensitive to headlines and liquidity. [29]
Technical views aren’t fundamentals—but in thin holiday sessions, technical levels can influence how traders place orders when markets reopen.
Looking beyond the holidays, the EIA’s Short-Term Energy Outlook narrative points to Henry Hub averaging around $4/mmBtu next year, with production growth limited and LNG exports rising. [30]
That aligns with mainstream consumer-facing summaries that expect U.S. wholesale natural gas prices to be meaningfully higher in 2026 than 2025. [31]
As liquidity returns (and European markets reopen after Dec. 26 closures), these are the near-term catalysts most likely to move “natural gas price today” headlines:
1. www.worldenergynews.com, 2. www.ice.com, 3. www.bairdmaritime.com, 4. www.brecorder.com, 5. www.worldenergynews.com, 6. www.bairdmaritime.com, 7. www.brecorder.com, 8. www.bairdmaritime.com, 9. www.worldenergynews.com, 10. www.bairdmaritime.com, 11. www.bairdmaritime.com, 12. www.gie.eu, 13. www.worldenergynews.com, 14. www.ice.com, 15. www.worldenergynews.com, 16. www.bairdmaritime.com, 17. www.bairdmaritime.com, 18. www.bairdmaritime.com, 19. www.mrt.com, 20. www.brecorder.com, 21. www.brecorder.com, 22. www.brecorder.com, 23. www.brecorder.com, 24. www.reuters.com, 25. www.reuters.com, 26. www.reuters.com, 27. ir.eia.gov, 28. www.investing.com, 29. www.fxempire.com, 30. www.eia.gov, 31. www.investopedia.com, 32. www.worldenergynews.com, 33. www.bairdmaritime.com, 34. www.bairdmaritime.com, 35. ir.eia.gov, 36. www.reuters.com
New Delhi, Dec 25 (IANS) India’s food safety regulator has tightened the rules on what can be officially called “tea”, making it clear that only products made from the plant Camellia sinensis can use the word on their labels.
In a directive, the Food Safety and Standards Authority of India (FSSAI) said that many food business operators are wrongly using the term “tea” for herbal infusions and plant-based drinks that are not made from Camellia sinensis. According to the regulator, this practice is misleading consumers and amounts to misbranding under the Food Safety and Standards Act, 2006.
The FSSAI said it found several products in the market being sold as “Rooibos tea”, “herbal tea” and “flower tea”, even though these beverages are not derived from the tea plant.
The authority clarified that such products do not meet the legal definition of tea and therefore cannot be marketed using that name.
As per existing regulations, only infusions made from Camellia sinensis qualify as tea. This includes well-known varieties such as green tea, Kangra tea and instant tea. Any drink made from other plants, herbs or flowers does not fall under this category.
The regulator has warned all food business operators, including manufacturers, packers, marketers, importers, sellers and e-commerce platforms, to stop using the word “tea” directly or indirectly for products that are not derived from Camellia sinensis.
Failure to comply, it said, will be treated as a violation of food safety laws.
FSSAI has also instructed state food safety officials to strictly enforce these rules and ensure that both offline and online sellers follow the correct labelling norms.
“The move is aimed at protecting consumers from confusion and ensuring transparency in how food and beverage products are described and sold,” experts said.
–IANS
pk
Pepeto ($PEPETO) is being positioned as an early-stage alternative at a moment when meme capital is rebalancing into the next wave of opportunity. Dogecoin remains the category icon, but the market now treats it like a mature asset with slower percentage expansion.
According to CoinMarketCap, DOGE trades near $0.127744 with a market cap around $21,464,927,858. That scale is why crypto news today readers increasingly compare a large-cap meme like DOGE with a micro-valuation presale that can still reprice aggressively. Pepeto enters that conversation with a tiny entry price and an infrastructure thesis aimed at converting usage into token demand.
Source: https://coinmarketcap.com/currencies/dogecoin/
Dogecoin Price Prediction: Why Multiples Compress at Scale
Dogecoin has liquidity and recognition, and those strengths will likely keep it relevant into 2026. They also explain why DOGE behaves differently from early-stage meme assets. When an asset already sits in the tens of billions, it often needs fresh capital measured in billions to produce a clean breakout. As a result, DOGE rallies can be meaningful, but they tend to be measured in single-digit multiples rather than the explosive expansions that defined its earliest era.
That does not mean DOGE is a bad trade. It means its role has evolved into a liquid meme benchmark. It can outperform in meme seasons, but it is unlikely to deliver a 50x result from here without a historic new demand shock. Investors chasing the biggest return curve therefore look for an asset earlier on the adoption timeline, where valuation is still small and price discovery is still open.
Source: https://blockchain.news/news/20251224-price-prediction-doge-targeting-01346-by-january-2026-as
Pepeto Price Prediction: The Presale Setup Built for Asymmetry
Pepeto (https://pepeto.io) is built on the Ethereum mainnet and markets itself as meme culture plus real utility, framed as “PEPE plus Technology plus Optimization.” Its infrastructure stack is the differentiator. PepetoSwap is positioned as a zero-fee swap, Pepeto Bridge as cross-chain connectivity, and Pepeto Exchange as a verified meme exchange where all volume routes through $PEPETO. If the ecosystem becomes a hub for meme trading, activity becomes repeated token interaction rather than a one-time hype spike.
On the presale snapshot, 1 $PEPETO is priced at $0.000000173. The raise stands at $7,113,592.37, with a countdown timer active for the next price increase. Supply is fixed at 420T, staking APY is promoted around 216% (https://pepeto.io/en/staking) and audits are listed as SolidProof and Coinsult. The community is positioned at 100,000+ members, and the ecosystem narrative highlights 850+ projects applying to list.
Staking matters because it can influence early supply behavior. When holders stake at high yields, fewer tokens may be available to sell during the first major listing windows, tightening supply when attention rises.
How 50x Is Modeled: Rotation, Ladders, and Demand Loops
A 50x thesis is built on market cap ladders and adoption milestones, not a random price target. Early-stage assets can move quickly because a small absolute increase in demand can create a large percentage move. Pepeto argues its infrastructure can help volume persist because swaps, bridging, and exchange activity keep users engaged beyond a single trend cycle.
Capital rotation also matters. In meme cycles, money often starts in the safest, most liquid names, then migrates into higher beta plays once risk appetite returns. Dogecoin often benefits first. The next wave is typically new narratives with smaller bases.
Under the dollar language often matters more for psychology than math. Retail buyers anchor to low nominal prices because it feels like more units are being accumulated, even though market cap is what drives value. Presales can benefit from that perception, especially when the entry is fixed and stage increases are visible. At the same time, early-stage plays carry higher execution risk, so position sizing matters.
A common approach is to treat DOGE as the liquid core and a presale like Pepeto as the asymmetric satellite, so upside potential is pursued without overexposure. That is why many buyers frame Pepeto as the best crypto presale to buy when they want exposure before listings drive broader discovery.
How to Buy Pepeto: Timing and Safety
Start on pepeto.io and confirm the domain spelling before you connect anything. Connect your wallet, then choose a purchase route using ETH, USDT, BNB, or a bank card through the supported checkout. After purchase, consider staking immediately to activate the high yield while the presale is still active. The official site also promotes a $700,000 giveaway, so follow only instructions provided on the verified page.
Final Outlook
Dogecoin remains a liquid blue-chip meme, and it can still rally with the broader market. Pepeto has a higher risk profile, but it is structured around routed volume demand, staking-based supply lock, a fixed 420T supply, dual audits, and a 100,000+ community.
For investors looking for the best crypto to buy now and selecting a top crypto to invest in candidate under $1 with room to reprice, Pepeto is framed as the high-beta leg that could outperform every other meme coin in 2026.
Buy Pepeto Presale and don’t miss the opportunity: https://pepeto.io
To stay ahead of key updates, listings, and announcements, follow Pepeto on its official channels only:
Website: https://pepeto.io
X (Twitter): https://x.com/Pepetocoin
Telegram: https://t.me/pepeto_channel
Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/pepetocoin/
Contact: Dani Bonocci
Website: https://www.tokenwire.io
Phone: +971586738991
SOURCE: Pepeto
Press release distribution
This release was published on openPR.
Developer Jokers, a company founded by former Sega staff, announced on December 22 that it has halted development of Code of Jokers Evolutions, a blockchain mobile game it had been working on under official license from Sega.
Originally announced in March this year, Code of Jokers Evolutions was unveiled as a digital card game based on Sega’s arcade trading card game IP. The arcade version of Code of Jokers was in circulation from 2013 to 2019, and it received a short-lived mobile version called Code of Jokers Pocket (also developed by Sega) in 2017, which ended services the following year.
The new Code of Jokers Evolutions was announced as a revival of the franchise, inheriting key features of the original Code of Jokers while integrating new gimmicks like user-to-user trading using blockchain technology. Development was originally underway with an international release planned for 2025 and a domestic release planned by the end of 2026. However, in its new announcement, developer Jokers says it has decided to cancel the title “after considering recent changes in the Web3 game market environment.” While the company doesn’t go into the details, the decision seems consistent with current tendencies in the Japanese game industry. While it happened a bit later than overseas, Japan’s NFT game fad appears to be fizzling out even in the eyes of the people making them.

As mentioned, Jokers is a game company founded by former Sega staff Yasuhiro Nishiyama (producer of the original Code of Joker, Sangokushi Taisen) and Wataru Sato (Bakugan producer at Sega Toys). With the announcement of Code of Jokers Evolutions’s cancellation, the developer says it will be accepting buybacks from users who purchased the collaboration NFT pack released ahead of the game’s launch via this portal.
Related articles: Japanese NFT game company’s currency crashes after users discover infinite money glitch