The main category of All News Articles.
You can use the search box below to find what you need.
[wd_asp id=1]
The main category of All News Articles.
You can use the search box below to find what you need.
[wd_asp id=1]
Coca-Cola Company (KO) declined in its latest intraday trading, breaking below its 50-day SMA, which has increased near-term negative pressure on the stock. This move comes alongside the emergence of a negative crossover on the RSI, reinforcing short-term weakness. However, the main bullish trend still dominates the medium term, with price action continuing to move alongside a supportive upward trendline, which limits the downside risk for now.
Therefore we expect the stock price to move higher in the upcoming trading, as long as it remains stable above the support level at $68.80, to target the resistance level at $71.30.
Today’s price forecast: Neutral
BHP Group Ltd (ASX: BHP; NYSE: BHP) is heading into the year-end holiday stretch with a familiar “big miner” cocktail: copper is surging to historic highs, iron ore remains the profit engine but is tangled in tough China-facing commercial politics, and investors are still weighing whether BHP’s next leg of growth comes from disciplined project delivery—or the temptation of headline-grabbing M&A.
With markets thinned by Christmas-week trading, the most actionable inputs for BHP stock right now are not dramatic one-day price moves, but the underlying drivers that will shape cash flow and dividends across 2026: copper pricing and supply tightness, iron ore volumes and realized pricing, and BHP’s ability to execute major growth projects (and fund them smartly).
In U.S. trading, BHP’s NYSE-listed ADR closed around $60.87 in the latest session available (Dec. 24, 2025) and implies a market capitalization near $155 billion. [1]
In Australia, BHP has been back on investor radar after a late-2025 rebound, with one widely followed valuation note pointing to roughly a 12% one-month lift and a share price around A$45 (Dec. 23). [2]
That bounce matters because BHP is often traded as a “macro + dividends + China” proxy. When metals prices rip higher, BHP tends to benefit—but the market also tends to ask, immediately and relentlessly: Will the company actually convert this cycle into sustainable free cash flow and shareholder returns?
The most obvious, loudest tailwind into Dec. 25 is copper.
Copper prices pushed into record territory this week, breaking above $12,000 per tonne amid a mix of supply disruptions, tariff fears, and tightening availability outside the U.S. [3] The broader market narrative is that copper is being pulled in two directions at once:
Reuters’ metals coverage has repeatedly highlighted the “dislocation” angle—where the threat of tariffs can be as market-moving as tariffs themselves, reshaping where copper sits and who feels “short” of metal. [4]
The other piece: analysts have been modeling persistent deficits. A Reuters roundup of copper market dynamics cited expectations for a 124,000-tonne deficit in 2025 and 150,000 tonnes in 2026, alongside a demand story increasingly tied to power infrastructure and AI-era electricity buildouts. [5]
BHP is not “a copper pure play,” but copper is one of the company’s most important levers for growth and narrative momentum—and BHP’s own operational readouts have leaned into that.
In its operational review for the quarter ended Sept. 30, 2025 (reported in October), BHP said group copper production rose 4% and highlighted record concentrator throughput at Escondida. The company also reiterated FY2026 copper production guidance of 1,800–2,000 kt, with Escondida guidance 1,150–1,250 kt. [6]
When copper is printing all-time highs, markets usually do two things at once:
BHP is trying to be in both camps.
Even with copper stealing the spotlight, iron ore remains the heavy gravitational mass in BHP’s earnings universe. And right now, the iron ore story has two layers:
BHP reported quarterly iron ore production of 64.1 Mt, with FY2026 guidance unchanged at 258–269 Mt (equity basis). WAIO (Western Australia Iron Ore) shipments and supply-chain execution were positioned as standouts, including the completion of the Car Dumper 3 rebuild at Port Hedland ahead of schedule. [7]
BHP also disclosed an average realized iron ore price around US$84.04/wmt for that quarter (Sept. 2025 quarter), up year-on-year in the same disclosure. [8]
The more delicate layer is the ongoing negotiation tension between major miners and China’s centralised iron ore buying apparatus.
Reuters reported that a stand-off between China Mineral Resources Group (CMRG) and BHP tightened iron ore supplies, with market participants pointing to disrupted flows tied to contract negotiations. [9]
In a related Reuters report, several BHP cargoes were reportedly offered for sale in China amid “ban fear” headlines, with sources indicating at least one cargo traded—suggesting a complicated reality: pressure points exist, but trade in other grades can continue even while specific products are frozen. [10]
For BHP stock, this matters because iron ore isn’t just a commodity exposure—it’s also a relationship exposure. If negotiations snarl into prolonged disruptions (even if partial), the market will price in risk around volumes, realized pricing, and China channel access.
One underappreciated theme for miners in 2026 is not just volume, but quality—especially as steelmakers and regulators push on emissions and efficiency.
An Argus analysis published Dec. 23, 2025 argued that new supply developments could lift average grades for major producers, specifically pointing to the ramp-up of BHP’s Samarco operations in Brazil as a potential support for BHP’s overall product quality. Argus noted BHP’s aim to produce 7–7.5 million tonnes of ~67% Fe pellets at Samarco in FY2025–26 and referenced longer-term ramp potential toward higher capacity by 2028. [11]
This dovetails with BHP’s own FY2026 Samarco guidance of 7–7.5 Mt (equity basis). [12]
If iron ore markets become more quality-sensitive over time, “better tons” can matter disproportionately—especially in tight markets where buyers pay up for consistency and performance.
BHP also gave markets a clear signal in December: it wants to fund growth while keeping balance sheet flexibility, and it’s willing to “recycle capital” from infrastructure-like assets to do it.
Reuters reported that BHP struck a $2 billion deal with Global Infrastructure Partners (GIP)—owned by BlackRock—linked to BHP’s WAIO inland power network. The structure involved a new entity with BHP holding 51% and GIP 49%, with BHP retaining operational control and paying a tariff over 25 years tied to usage. [13]
This kind of transaction tends to be read as:
For BHP stock, it’s also a signal that management is actively trying to avoid a “dividends vs growth” zero-sum fight.
BHP investors—especially in Australia—treat the stock like a hybrid: part commodity exposure, part income vehicle.
On that front, Reuters’ coverage of BHP’s FY2025 results (year ended June 30, 2025) reported:
This is the core bargain BHP stock keeps making with the market: You accept cyclicality, and in return you get scale, resilience, and a meaningful slice of cash when the cycle cooperates.
Copper strength helps that bargain. Iron ore stability protects it. Cost blowouts and project delays threaten it.
Analyst forecasts are not prophecy; they’re structured guesses with assumptions wearing a suit and pretending they don’t sweat. Still, they matter because they influence institutional positioning.
One widely referenced compilation (MarketBeat) put BHP at a “Hold” consensus rating based on 10 analyst ratings, with an average 12‑month price target of $48.50 (range $44–$53), versus the then-current ADR price around $60.87. [15]
In Australia, a valuation-focused note (Simply Wall St) suggested BHP was trading very close to a “fair value” estimate around A$44.94 versus a recent price around A$45.07, framing the stock as near fully priced after the recent rebound. [16]
If you’re trying to reconcile “copper at record highs” with “Hold ratings,” the missing link is usually one (or more) of these assumptions:
In other words: analysts can like the assets and still hesitate on timing, because miners are where macro confidence goes to be tested.
For traders who follow technical indicators (and yes, even fundamental investors secretly peek), Investor’s Business Daily noted BHP’s ADR Relative Strength (RS) Rating rising to 81 from 78 in mid-December, a momentum signal often interpreted as bullish—while also cautioning the stock had moved beyond an “ideal” buy range after a breakout pattern. [17]
That’s basically the technical version of: “Nice move—now don’t chase it.”
Here are the highest-signal catalysts and risks as of Dec. 25, 2025—ranked by how directly they can hit BHP’s cash flow narrative:
Copper price structure (not just the headline):
Watch whether copper stays elevated because of real deficits and constrained mine supply, or whether trade-driven inventory relocation unwinds. Reuters’ reporting has emphasized how tariff uncertainty can distort prices and stock locations. [18]
China iron ore negotiations:
Pay attention to whether the CMRG-related stand-offs remain isolated to specific products or broaden into wider commercial disruption. [19]
FY2026 delivery vs guidance:
BHP’s FY2026 guidance ranges—especially copper (1.8–2.0 Mt) and iron ore (258–269 Mt)—set the bar. Markets usually punish misses more than they reward small beats, because miners are supposed to be boring in the execution layer. [20]
Jansen potash and capex discipline:
BHP continues to position Jansen as a major long-term growth pillar, with Stage 1 tracking toward production in 2027 in its operational commentary. [21] Any renewed cost pressure will matter for valuation.
Capital allocation moves like the GIP deal:
More “capital recycling” transactions could be read positively—unless investors start to suspect BHP is selling the family silver to fund overruns. [22]
BHP stock is ending 2025 with momentum coming from two directions at once: a copper market that is screaming “scarcity” and “electrification,” and an iron ore business that is still operationally strong but increasingly entangled in China’s evolving approach to commodity purchasing power.
If copper stays structurally tight into 2026—and BHP executes on volume guidance and project milestones—the stock has a credible fundamental case as a diversified, cash-generative miner. If copper’s surge proves more trade-dislocation than durable deficit, or if iron ore negotiations create recurring disruptions, the market will likely revert to treating BHP as what it has always been at heart: a world-class portfolio living inside a cyclical pricing machine.
1. stockanalysis.com, 2. simplywall.st, 3. www.ft.com, 4. www.reuters.com, 5. www.reuters.com, 6. www.bhp.com, 7. www.bhp.com, 8. www.bhp.com, 9. www.reuters.com, 10. www.reuters.com, 11. www.argusmedia.com, 12. www.bhp.com, 13. www.reuters.com, 14. www.reuters.com, 15. www.marketbeat.com, 16. simplywall.st, 17. www.investors.com, 18. www.reuters.com, 19. www.reuters.com, 20. www.bhp.com, 21. www.bhp.com, 22. www.reuters.com
At this point it’s no secret that GLP-1s can be an effective strategy for losing weight. The problem? They’re not always that easy to get your hands on—and if they are, they might not come with the most pleasant side effects. (In fact, between 50 and 75 percent of people stop taking them within a year, per a 2024 study in JAMA Network Open.) Enter: “natural GLP-1 supplements.” Yup, supplements that promise to give similar results to those mighty weight loss meds without the same hassle.
Between berberine and psyllium husk duking it out for the title of “nature’s Ozempic” and all the new concoctions being developed by brands, there’s no shortage of options on the market. Kourtney Kardashian’s Lemme brand has Lemme GLP-1 Daily, touted on Instagram as “a breakthrough innovation in metabolic health, formulated to naturally boost your body’s GLP-1 production, reduce appetite, and promote healthy weight loss.” Supergut sells a GLP-1 Daily Support, while Pendulum offers a GLP-1 Probiotic. “This multi-strain probiotic is formulated with beneficial bacteria that naturally increase GLP-1, the ‘un-hunger’ hormone that helps curb cravings and appetite,” according to the Pendulum website. Many of these supplements are specifically marketed to women, playing on the idea that out-of-whack hormones might be contributing to weight gain.
Obviously, there’s one critical question: do these supplements actually work? We tapped obesity medicine physicians for their answer.
Meet the experts: Kunal Shah, MD, is an assistant professor in the division of endocrinology at the Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical Center. Mir Ali, MD, is a bariatric surgeon and medical director of MemorialCare Surgical Weight Loss Center at Orange Coast Medical Center.
First, a quick refresher on what a GLP-1 receptor agonist is: one of the most popular GLP-1 receptor agonists is Ozempic, a semaglutide medication that’s technically designed to help control blood sugar in people with type 2 diabetes. (The drug is approved by the Food and Drug Administration for weight loss under the name Wegovy.) After research demonstrated that people could lose up to 11 percent of their body weight from Ozempic, it skyrocketed in popularity as an off-label medication for weight loss.
Semaglutide works by mimicking a protein in your body called glucagon-like peptide 1, a.k.a. GLP-1, says Kunal Shah, MD, an assistant professor in the division of endocrinology at the Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical Center. There are also a similar class of drugs, called tirzepatide, and those include meds Mounjaro (for type 2 diabetes) and Zepbound (for weight loss).
This activates GLP-1 receptors in your body, leading to an increase in the production of insulin, which helps move glucose into your cells, where it’s used for energy, Dr. Shah says. But GLP-1 receptor agonists do more than just help shuttle glucose around your body. “These medications slow down the transit of food from the stomach to the gut, making you feel full,” Dr. Shah says. You also have receptors in your brain that modulate your hunger and metabolism. Ozempic and other GLP-1s signal to those receptors, making you feel less hungry, he says.
Still following? Your body produces GLP-1 naturally after you eat, but Ozempic and other similar medications are more reliable forms of the same hormone your body makes, Dr. Shah says.
Here’s where “natural” GLP-1 supplements come in. These products contain a range of ingredients that companies claim will help stimulate GLP-1 production in your body. Each supplement is slightly different, but these are a few ingredients that have come up:
These can all impact the body, yes, but it’s a stretch to suggest that these would have the same effect as GLP-1 receptor agonist medications, says Mir Ali, MD, a bariatric surgeon and medical director of MemorialCare Surgical Weight Loss Center at Orange Coast Medical Center.
That’s the million-dollar question. Currently, some in the medical community don’t buy the idea that a supplement can give you similar results as GLP-1 receptor agonists.
“I haven’t seen convincing evidence that any of these will make a significant impact on weight loss,” Dr. Ali says. “They are not nearly on par with [weight loss] medications.”
Natural supplements have “very mild effects” on weight loss based on what Dr. Ali has seen. There is some data to suggest that saffron, green tea, or turmeric can have a slight impact on GLP-1 production, he says, but again, it’s not a ton.
One way to stimulate similar effects is by focusing on protein, Dr. Ali says. “Eating more protein increases natural GLP-1 production.” That’s true whether you’re going through menopause or have an underlying health condition that makes you prone to weight gain, but protein can really stimulate similar effects for anyone, he says. He recommends 1.2 to 1.5 grams of protein per kilogram of body weight per day, or about 30 to 35 grams of protein per meal.
So, while you may be interested in taking a so-called natural GLP-1 supplement, you’re unlikely to see a major impact on your weight—at least, not nearly at the level that you’d see if you took a GLP-1 receptor agonist medication. While GLP-1 receptor agonists are not cheap, some companies are looking at ways to make them more affordable. Eli Lilly, for example, recently announced that they would be selling vials of Zepbound and Mounjaro directly to consumers, which will half the cost of the medications. Other companies are expected to follow.
If you’re a healthy person with no underlying health conditions, you’re probably OK to take a GLP-1 supplement. “It certainly doesn’t seem to be harmful for most people to take these,” Dr. Ali says.
Keep in mind that some of these contain caffeine or other stimulants, so you’ll want to make sure that you don’t overdo it on top of the caffeine you may already be having in your day. And if you’re taking any medications, there’s always a risk that any supplement could interact with it. That’s why you should always consult with your doctor before hopping on a GLP-1 supplement, Dr. Ali says.
It’s also worth considering that the supplement industry is largely unregulated, making it difficult to know if what a company claims is in the bottle is actually accurate. In fact, several popular herbal supplements have been linked to liver damage and other health issues. So, to be safe, whenever you’re buying a supplement, try to opt for products that are doctor-recommended and third-party tested.
At the end of the day, if you’re trying to lose weight, consult a doctor before trying a new strategy or supplement—no matter how promising it appears. “If you want to lose weight, start by speaking to a primary care physician,” Dr. Ali says. “If you qualify for the actual medications, that would be the best route.”
Korin Miller is a freelance writer specializing in general wellness, sexual health and relationships, and lifestyle trends, with work appearing in Men’s Health, Women’s Health, Self, Glamour, and more. She has a master’s degree from American University, lives by the beach, and hopes to own a teacup pig and taco truck one day.
Natural gas markets are ending Christmas Eve with a familiar mix of volatility and contradiction: U.S. Henry Hub-linked futures are retreating after a sharp rally, while Europe’s benchmark prices are firming modestly—all as traders juggle shifting temperature models, LNG headlines, and a holiday-altered flow of “must-watch” data releases.
As of today’s session on Wednesday, December 24, 2025, Natural Gas futures were around $4.249 per MMBtu, down about 3.6% on the day, after opening near $4.421 and trading in a $4.183–$4.589 range. [1]
In Europe, the TTF benchmark rose to roughly €28.09/MWh on Dec. 24, up about 1.37%. [2]
The big picture: markets are still pricing a winter that can change quickly, but the short-term narrative into the holiday weekend is being shaped by near-term warmth in parts of the U.S., regional cold risks, and the ever-present global LNG linkage that increasingly ties U.S. pricing to events well beyond North America.
The most important context for today’s decline is what happened just before it.
On Tuesday, U.S. natural gas futures surged, and today’s selloff looks like a classic “giveback” in thin holiday liquidity, as traders reassessed the balance between near-term warmth and later-winter cold risk. One market commentary described the move as a drop that partly reversed Tuesday’s sharp rally, citing weather shifts that turned somewhat warmer for the U.S. East Coast in early January, even as colder risks persisted elsewhere. [3]
The day’s tape aligns with the broader pricing data: Dec. 24 shows a sharp down day after a strong up day, reinforcing that weather-driven re-pricing—rather than a single supply shock—is still the primary driver heading into year-end. [4]
While U.S. futures weakened today, European benchmarks moved the other way—at least modestly.
This Europe-firmer/U.S.-softer split is one reason global gas watchers keep emphasizing spreads: when Europe’s benchmark holds up while Henry Hub swings around, LNG economics and destination competition can change quickly.
If there’s a single “boss level” for natural gas traders, it’s weather—and that remains true on Dec. 24.
A widely followed weather-oriented outlook indicated that warmer-than-normal temperatures were expected to dominate much of the U.S. over the next 7 days, with overall light demand (and only limited colder exceptions). [8]
At the same time, regional cold risks are clearly on the map:
Put simply: national demand can look “light” while critical regions turn sharply colder, and that’s enough to keep volatility alive—especially when the market is already perched above $4 and reacting to every model update.
The U.S. Energy Information Administration’s latest Short-Term Energy Outlook (released Dec. 9) underscored how strongly early December cold can re-shape expectations:
Even if the next 7 days skew warmer for much of the country, these longer heating-season assumptions help explain why prices can stay elevated—and why rallies can return fast if colder risks reassert themselves in January and February.
Because natural gas is seasonal and storage-dependent, the weekly storage report remains a central “gravity point” for pricing—even when holiday schedules disrupt the normal rhythm.
The latest EIA Weekly Natural Gas Storage Report available today shows:
EIA’s storage page lists the next release as December 29, 2025, rather than the typical Thursday cadence. [15]
A market note also flagged that the storage report timing was rescheduled because of the Christmas holiday. [16]
For traders, that matters because weather volatility doesn’t pause for holidays—but some of the most market-moving confirmation data does. That mismatch can magnify price swings.
Beyond daily price moves, one of today’s most important structural developments is in LNG contracting.
On Dec. 24, Malaysia’s state energy firm Petronas announced it will supply 1 million metric tons per annum of LNG to CNOOC Gas and Power Singapore Trading & Marketing, deepening an existing relationship between the companies. [17]
Why this matters for “natural gas today,” not just LNG watchers:
Another Dec. 24 development hits the reliability question directly.
Texas regulators said they are stepping up winter gas inspections, continuing post-Uri weatherization oversight into the 2025–26 cold season. The same update noted Texas working gas in storage reached 524.9 Bcf as of Nov. 30, 2025, described as the highest recorded in more than 25 years. [18]
For price-sensitive readers, the key point is not simply “more inspections,” but what it implies:
Forecasts published or reiterated today point to a market still wrestling with competing forces:
In its December STEO natural gas section, EIA said rising production is expected to moderate prices next year, while still forecasting:
An energy-cost outlook published today pointed to natural gas prices rising in 2026, citing a combination of stagnant domestic production and increasing U.S. exports, with an estimate of about a 16% rise in 2026. [21]
The most practical takeaway: even if daily futures swing on short-term weather, the forward-looking consensus still assumes a structurally tighter market than the ultra-cheap gas era, largely because exports (especially LNG) keep expanding the demand base tied—directly or indirectly—to Henry Hub.
Heading out of Christmas Eve, these are the biggest catalysts traders and consumers will track:
Natural gas is closing Christmas Eve with U.S. prices easing to about $4.25/MMBtu, while European benchmarks are slightly higher, and the market narrative remains weather-first, data-scheduled-second, LNG-always. [26]
If you want, I can also tailor this article for a specific geography and audience (U.S. retail consumers vs. European industrial buyers vs. traders) while keeping it Google News/Discover-ready—without changing any of the core facts above.
1. www.investing.com, 2. tradingeconomics.com, 3. www.barchart.com, 4. www.investing.com, 5. tradingeconomics.com, 6. www.investing.com, 7. www.investing.com, 8. natgasweather.com, 9. www.ctinsider.com, 10. www.chron.com, 11. www.eia.gov, 12. www.eia.gov, 13. www.eia.gov, 14. ir.eia.gov, 15. ir.eia.gov, 16. www.barchart.com, 17. www.reuters.com, 18. www.mrt.com, 19. www.eia.gov, 20. www.eia.gov, 21. www.investopedia.com, 22. www.ctinsider.com, 23. ir.eia.gov, 24. www.reuters.com, 25. www.mrt.com, 26. www.investing.com
Crypto analyst DEFI PENIEL highlighted that XRP has held steady above a crucial demand zone between $1.82 and $1.98, as per a Coin Edition report. This same range, which served as a major sell zone during the 2021 crypto bull market, has now strengthened as a support area in 2025.
XRP-linked investment products have continued to see positive cash inflows in recent weeks despite market volatility. DEFI PENIEL noted that, “You don’t need bullish tweets here. You need support to hold while fear does the work. That’s how accumulation actually looks,” as quoted by Coin Edition.
Analyst CrediBULL Crypto expects XRP to outperform Bitcoin in the upcoming 2026 bull market. The XRP/BTC pair has confirmed a bullish breakout, setting the stage for a fresh rally. According to Elliott Wave theory, the pair is completing its second wave, preparing for a third wave.
Experts have been encouraging XRP accumulation as capital is expected to rotate into altcoins next year. The altcoin market underperformed Bitcoin in 2025 due to Bitcoin’s global stability, but the landscape could change following the signing of the Clarity Act by US president Donald Trump, possibly before the end of the first quarter of 2026, as per the Coin Edition report.
Also read: Trump’s $2,000 tariff dividend warning: Why experts predict grocery bills could rise in USOngoing global money printing has also weakened fiat currencies, increasing demand for alternative assets, including cryptocurrencies and precious metals, from institutions, retailers, and central banks.
With the XRP ecosystem growing rapidly in 2025 and benefiting from US regulatory clarity, analysts suggest that investors may want to consider taking a more aggressive position in the coming weeks. XRP’s US spot ETFs have also outperformed other altcoins, further supporting its bullish outlook for 2026, as per the Coin Edition report.
What price zone is XRP holding above right now?
XRP is holding strong between $1.82 and $1.98, which has become a key support area.
Why are analysts optimistic about XRP in 2026?
Regulatory clarity in the US and a potential altcoin market rally are boosting confidence.
Bears have a firm grip on the leading GameFi tokens, with the majority of them in the red.
It was another meh week for the gaming industry as it caught stray bullets from scammers.
Source: SentismAI
Source: Mothership
Source: CoinMarketCap
Source: CoinMarketCap
A handful of GameFi tokens pulled ahead this week. Each posted small gains in a market trending lower.
You could have blindly shorted the leading Web3 gaming coins and still made a killing, as the majority are bleeding double-digit losses.
Source: CoinMarketCap
It was another blow to the Web3 gaming sector as it slumped from second to 12th place on DeFiLlama’s narrative tracker. Liquidity is thin, and prediction markets are the talk of the town.
Source: DeFiLlama
This article contains links to third-party websites or other content for information purposes only (“Third-Party Sites”). The Third-Party Sites are not under the control of CoinMarketCap, and CoinMarketCap is not responsible for the content of any Third-Party Site, including without limitation any link contained in a Third-Party Site, or any changes or updates to a Third-Party Site. CoinMarketCap is providing these links to you only as a convenience, and the inclusion of any link does not imply endorsement, approval or recommendation by CoinMarketCap of the site or any association with its operators. This article is intended to be used and must be used for informational purposes only. It is important to do your own research and analysis before making any material decisions related to any of the products or services described. This article is not intended as, and shall not be construed as, financial advice. The views and opinions expressed in this article are the author’s [company’s] own and do not necessarily reflect those of CoinMarketCap.
Copper price activated with the main indicators again, surpassing the barrier at $5.5000, announcing its readiness to achieve extra gains on a near-term basis, therefore, we will keep our bullish expectations, reminding you that the extra target near $5.6300 and $5.7400 level.
Note that the price stability below the current barrier might force it to form mixed trading, and there is a chance of testing the support at $5.1500.
The expected trading range for today is between $5.3900 and $5.6300
Trend forecast: Bullish
XRP is facing renewed downside pressure after slipping below a long-defended weekly support level, signaling a potential shift in market structure as traders reassess short-term price risk following a prolonged consolidation phase.
The breakdown below the $1.95 zone, an area reinforced by Fibonacci retracement levels and long-term moving averages, has placed XRP at a technical crossroads. This level mattered not only technically but also behaviorally, as it had consistently attracted dip-buying throughout 2025. With that support now compromised, market participants are closely watching whether buyers can stabilize price action or if downside momentum accelerates toward lower support zones.
At the time of writing, XRP is trading near $1.86, reflecting a 1.25% decline during the latest 24-hour session, according to Brave New Coin data. Trading volume over the same period stands at approximately $2.08 billion, suggesting sustained liquidity even as price weakens. The move places XRP below a level that had repeatedly acted as a price floor earlier this year, raising questions about near-term stability.
XRP was trading at around 1.85, down 1.25% in the last 24 hours at press time. Source: XRP price via Brave New Coin
From a broader market perspective, the XRP market cap has softened alongside price, while volatility has begun to expand. Historically, similar weekly breakdowns in XRP have led to heightened intraday swings as leveraged positions adjust, rather than immediate directional follow-through.
On the weekly chart, XRP has slipped below the $1.95 support zone, which aligns with the 0.5 Fibonacci retracement and the 89-week exponential moving average (EMA). These levels are widely monitored because they often mark equilibrium points during corrective phases within broader market cycles. A loss of such confluence tends to weaken bullish conviction.

XRP tests $1.95 support, with a weekly close below risking $1.60 and a close above potentially sparking a bounce toward $2.30. Source: @CryptoXLARG via X
Technical analyst CryptoXLARG, who focuses on higher-timeframe crypto market structure on X, highlighted the significance of the move. The analyst noted that XRP remains capped below the descending trendline and the 8–21 EMA band, a zone commonly used to gauge short- to medium-term trend strength.
“$1.95 has been a structural support all year,” the analyst explained. “Losing it on a weekly basis shifts the technical bias lower.”
A confirmed weekly close below this level increases the probability of a move toward the 0.618 Fibonacci retracement near $1.60, a level that often acts as a deeper corrective target rather than a trend reversal point.
Shorter timeframes continue to reflect underlying weakness. On the 4-hour chart, XRP remains confined within a descending channel, with multiple failed attempts to reclaim the $2.00–$2.05 resistance zone. This area has consistently attracted selling interest during recent rebounds.

XRP remains in a downtrend, repeatedly rejected at $2.00–$2.05 resistance, with potential downside toward $1.55–$1.50 unless it closes above $2.05. Source: @suryapro via X
Crypto market analyst Surya, who frequently publishes short-term technical breakdowns on X, noted that XRP “still hasn’t escaped the downtrend.” According to the analyst, as long as the $2.00–$2.05 range caps upside, downside scenarios toward $1.55–$1.50 remain technically valid.
These repeated rejections suggest that bullish momentum has yet to establish acceptance above resistance, limiting the durability of relief rallies.
Attention has now shifted to the $1.86–$1.87 region, which coincides with short-term historical support. Data from CoinDesk shows XRP recently closed near $1.87, placing this zone under immediate pressure as sellers retain control.

XRP faces strong selling pressure at the descending trendline, with price needing to hold key 4H support and break above resistance to unlock upside momentum. Source: Leo524 on TradingView
TradingView technical analyst Leo524, known for monitoring trendline interactions and intraday support zones, emphasized the importance of this area. The analyst observed that XRP has been rejected twice from the descending trendline and is now reliant on a critical 4-hour support band below current prices.
“Price must hold this support to avoid further downside,” the analyst wrote, adding that upside continuation would require a clean breakout above the trendline, rather than brief intraday spikes.
XRP’s move below the $1.95 weekly support has shifted market focus toward risk management rather than upside expansion. With price hovering near $1.86, the immediate question is whether this short-term support can stabilize price and slow downside momentum. A sustained hold above this zone would suggest consolidation rather than continuation.
Conversely, a decisive weekly close below current levels would strengthen the case for a deeper retracement toward the $1.60 Fibonacci level, where buyers may reassess risk exposure. Until XRP reclaims former support and breaks above the descending trendline, price action is likely to remain cautious, with traders awaiting clearer confirmation from higher-timeframe closes and broader market conditions.
December 24, 2025 (Updated 5:01) — Silver prices are in sharp focus today after a historic run pushed the metal into fresh record territory. In global markets, spot silver hit an all-time high of $72.70 per ounce before easing slightly as traders locked in profits during holiday-thinned trade. Reuters last cited silver around $71.94/oz, still up about 0.7% on the day. [1]
That pullback doesn’t change the bigger picture: silver’s 2025 rally has been extraordinary. Reuters pegged silver’s year-to-date gain around 149%, highlighting how the “white metal” has outpaced gold’s rise this year. [2]
Below is what’s driving silver today (24.12.2025), what analysts and market watchers are saying, and the key levels traders are watching next.
Silver’s breakout has become the defining precious-metals story into year-end:
The message is clear: after a nearly vertical climb, silver is trying to consolidate, not collapse—yet the swings are getting bigger, and that cuts both ways for anyone trading it short-term.
Precious metals tend to benefit when markets expect lower interest rates—because lower yields reduce the opportunity cost of holding non-yielding assets like gold and silver.
Reuters pointed to a market backdrop where:
That rate outlook has been reinforced by macro signals and investor positioning into year-end.
On a day when U.S. yields eased and the dollar’s tone remained an important macro input, precious metals stayed supported even as they cooled off from highs. Reuters described Treasury yields easing and noted that gold and silver “edged back from record levels.” [7]
In plain terms: silver didn’t need new buyers to keep levitating—it just needed the macro headwinds (yields/dollar) to stay contained.
Safe-haven demand rarely has a single trigger, but it often builds when investors sense rising geopolitical risk. Reuters highlighted a geopolitical strand in today’s broader market narrative, including attention on a Venezuela-linked oil tanker situation involving the U.S. Coast Guard. [8]
Even when headlines don’t directly involve metals, they can keep risk premiums alive—especially late in the year.
One underappreciated force today: thin year-end volume. Investing.com’s analysis explicitly warned that holiday conditions can exaggerate volatility, pushing prices to extremes more easily than during normal liquidity. [9]
That helps explain why silver can spike to a new record and then fade—without a major change in fundamentals.
Silver’s surge isn’t just a dollar story.
In India, The Times of India reported silver prices jumping to a fresh record in the national capital, with silver hitting ₹2,27,000 per kilogram in Delhi, citing the All India Sarafa Association. [10]
Meanwhile, The Economic Times tied the global move directly to Indian market action:
The rally even spilled into equities: The Economic Times reported Hindustan Zinc shares rising after silver crossed $72/oz, pointing to the company’s leverage to silver prices. [12]
Silver’s chart is flashing two truths at once:
FXEmpire’s December 24 analysis captured the mood: silver set a fresh record at $72.70 but struggled to hold the top as traders paused into the holiday break. [13]
Crucially, FXEmpire warned the rally looked stretched: silver was cited as about $17.81 above its 50‑day moving average, raising the odds of a near-term pullback even if the bigger trend remains bullish. [14]
Investing.com’s analysis went further, describing the environment as highly volatile and emphasizing intraday discipline. It flagged the $72.70–$72.80 area as an “intraday sell zone” with a stop above $73.50, while pointing to downside targets around $71.30, $71.00, and $70.00 if profit booking accelerates. [15]
Whether you agree with that trade setup or not, it underlines a widely shared view: the market is increasingly sensitive to profit-taking at record highs.
Barchart’s technical snapshot shows how “hot” this move has become:
Barchart also mapped clear reference levels traders may use as pivots:
These aren’t predictions—they’re decision points. In a market this fast, those levels can shape where stops cluster and where liquidity shows up.
Silver’s surge has kicked forecasting into a higher gear, especially because the market is now operating in “price discovery” mode.
In Reuters’ reporting, Kitco Metals senior analyst Jim Wyckoff said the next upside target for silver is $75/oz by the end of the year, adding that the technicals remain bullish. [18]
That’s an ambitious target—but it’s also close enough that traders will treat it as a magnet level if momentum returns.
For the bigger horizon, IG’s commodities outlook (published Dec. 23 and circulating into today’s Dec. 24 conversation) summarized the next year’s debate:
IG also emphasized the structural backdrop supporting silver—tightening supply, rising industrial demand, and a breakout setup—and argued silver is still “cheap relative to gold” when viewed through the gold/silver ratio lens. [20]
One important nuance: these aren’t unanimous views. The same volatility that powered the upside can create sharp drawdowns—particularly if rate expectations shift or if positioning becomes crowded.
With silver at record levels, it may not take much to trigger the next big leg—or the next sharp shakeout. Key items to watch:
Silver’s price action on December 24, 2025 is the classic late-stage momentum setup: still trending higher, still supported by rates and risk narratives, but stretched enough to snap back hard.
Market note: Prices can change quickly, especially around holidays. The levels above reflect figures and commentary reported on 24.12.2025 by the cited sources, not a fixed quote.
1. www.reuters.com, 2. www.reuters.com, 3. www.reuters.com, 4. www.reuters.com, 5. www.investing.com, 6. www.reuters.com, 7. www.reuters.com, 8. www.reuters.com, 9. www.investing.com, 10. timesofindia.indiatimes.com, 11. m.economictimes.com, 12. m.economictimes.com, 13. www.fxempire.com, 14. www.fxempire.com, 15. www.investing.com, 16. www.barchart.com, 17. www.barchart.com, 18. www.reuters.com, 19. www.ig.com, 20. www.ig.com, 21. www.reuters.com, 22. www.reuters.com, 23. www.investing.com, 24. www.fxempire.com, 25. m.economictimes.com, 26. www.reuters.com, 27. www.reuters.com, 28. www.barchart.com
Solana has extended its downturn in the final weeks of 2025, dipping below the $130 mark and testing levels around $120.
On Wednesday, prices fell to these lows across major exchanges, and more declines could allow bears to test recent lows of $116.
The $120 zone has acted as intermittent support throughout the year.
But as this decline aligns with a wider cryptocurrency market retracement amid reduced liquidity and profit-taking, SOL looks set for more pain.
In the past year, Solana has underperformed both Bitcoin and Ethereum, with SOL down 38% in the period compared to 11% and 16% for BTC and ETH.
Technical analysis suggests that Solana faces a critical juncture.
Charts show mounting evidence of a bearish breakdown that could propel prices toward $100 or lower in the near term.
A key concern is SOL’s position relative to its 50-day exponential moving average (EMA), currently estimated around $160-$165 based on recent data.
The price trading well below this level signals a loss of short-term momentum and reinforces a downtrend, as the 50-day EMA has acted as dynamic resistance in recent months.
Further supporting the bearish outlook are momentum indicators.

The Relative Strength Index (RSI) hovers in the low 30s to upper 30s across daily and weekly timeframes, approaching oversold territory but not yet indicating a definitive reversal.
In technical analysis, this suggests room for additional downside before exhaustion sets in.
Meanwhile, the Moving Average Convergence Divergence (MACD) histogram shows negative values, with the MACD line below its signal line, confirming weakening bullish momentum and persistent selling dominance.
Chart patterns add to the cautionary narrative.
Solana is testing a weekly neckline support around $120. A decisive break below this could accelerate declines toward deeper supports in $100-$90 region.
Despite these challenges, Solana’s ecosystem fundamentals remain robust.
The network has processed billions of transactions in 2025, maintaining its reputation for high throughput and low fees.
Institutional milestones, including the launch of US spot SOL ETFs and integrations with traditional finance platforms, have provided some counterbalance.
Solana spot ETFs recorded inflows on December 23, even as Bitcoin and Ethereum continued outflow streaks.
While volumes are modest compared to earlier in the month, cumulative net inflows have climbed to over $754 million. That’s bullish for SOL.
However, if institutional interest wavers further, short-term technical indicators align with a broader downtrend.