The main category of All News Articles.
You can use the search box below to find what you need.
[wd_asp id=1]
The main category of All News Articles.
You can use the search box below to find what you need.
[wd_asp id=1]
In the short-term, however, a pullback to test prior resistance as support – the first pullback after the breakout – is a risk. A first, more significant upside target at 127.2.% extension of the prior pullback is at $4,516. That is essentially a match to the high for the week to date, especially given a mild bearish reaction that followed Wednesday’s high. The prior high of $4,381, along with the 10-day average, now at $4,360 and rising, presents a first more significant potential support zone. A bullish reversal ending a pullback higher than $4,381, would suggest sustained strong support.
When considering prior upswings in the price of gold, the current eight-week advance may still be early in the current leg up that began from the October swing low, given gains seen since then. Out of the four prior new trend highs sustained since 2024, time ranges are indicated at 5 and 6 weeks, and then at 11 and 12 weeks. Keep in mind that the first week of a new high breakout has yet to complete. This leaves potential in time and price.
In addition to the rising slope of the bull trend, strong bullish momentum is indicated by a successful second breakout through the top of a rising trend channel. This confirms strength in the current advance. At the same time, it shows the price becoming further extended. Nevertheless, the potential for a continuation of the trend with a higher rate of change is suggested by the pattern. The next upside target for gold is at the 161.8% projection of a rising ABCD pattern. Further up is a large confluence zone starting at $4,664 and up to $4,713.
For a look at all of today’s economic events, check out our economic calendar.
I love many different herbal teas just as much as I enjoy a good old-fashioned British cup of PG tips, Earl Grey, or Glengettie — a Welsh favorite from the rolling valleys where I was born. In an interesting study, researchers explored whether drinking green or matcha tea can improve sports performance and exercise recovery, and the results might have you reaching for a vibrant green drink. If you want to get straight to the results, the short answer is that drinking green and matcha tea can support hydration, body fat control, and exercise recovery. Still, it definitely won’t be a game-changer when it comes to your performance in the gym, on the court, or on the field.
Ali Senol / Pexels
In a study published in Nutrition and Food Technology, researchers reviewed existing studies of athletes and active adults that focused solely on drinking tea — no pills or extracts. They revealed that green or matcha tea can help hydrate the body when consumed in normal amounts. Tea counts toward your daily water intake.
Exnl / Pexels
The research highlighted how the widely-studied antioxidants in green and matcha tea can improve exercise recovery and help protect your cells from the stress associated with intense exercise. That said, the research shows that drinking tea won’t lead to faster or better strength gains, so it’s no silver bullet for helping you achieve your fitness goals. However, they also concluded that low-caffeine green tea could even improve sleep quality, which I would argue could potentially help you power through that workout if you’re getting better sleep the night before.
Ketut Subiyanto / Pexels
Interestingly, the study authors also concluded that drinking around two or three cups of green or matcha tea per day was associated with slightly lower body fat and improved body composition and fat burning. While the effects weren’t overly significant, they were noted in the research. Cup of tea, anyone?
Murphy explained that as market makers unwind their hedge positions during the expiration process, the temporary support and resistance levels created by the options market may weaken, as per a Bitcoin Sistemi
report. This could result in sharp and rapid price movements until traders reposition themselves and a new funding structure forms.
The analysis suggested that if Bitcoin revisits its previous low in the $80,000 to $82,000 range, it could create a speculative opportunity for a short-term rebound, as per the Bitcoin Sistemi report. Murphy emphasized that strong volatility during periods of low liquidity does not always signal the start of a new market crash.
Also read: Supercomputers reveal the truth about what happens near a Black Hole
At the same time, early signs of a bullish divergence have started to appear on shorter timeframes. This signal emerges when the pace of Bitcoin’s price decline is stronger than the rate of capital outflows, pointing to the possibility of a correction or temporary recovery within a broader downtrend.
The analysis used the Price and Capital Inflow Gradient indicator, which measures the relationship between price momentum and actual capital flows. In previous market cycles, sharp price declines paired with slowing capital outflows have often been followed by rebound rallies.
The report noted that after four bullish divergence signals observed during 2021–2022 and 2024–2025, Bitcoin experienced recoveries of varying sizes and, in some cases, trend reversals. However, with overall market sentiment still in a phase of recovery from a bear market, the analysis suggested that any upside move this time is more likely to be limited and short term.
What is happening in the Bitcoin market on December 26?
About $23.6 billion worth of Bitcoin options are set to expire, making it the largest options expiry on record.
Why is this options expiry important for Bitcoin’s price?
Large expiries can weaken temporary support and resistance levels, leading to increased price volatility.
December 25, 2025 — Energy stocks are heading into 2026 with a rare mix of forces pulling in opposite directions: bearish oil-price forecasts tied to oversupply, winter-driven natural gas volatility, and fresh geopolitical and sanctions-related headlines that can swing sentiment fast—even during holiday-thinned trading.
On the commodity side, oil ended the latest session near the low-$60s (Brent) and high-$50s (WTI), with year-end commentary increasingly focused on a 2026 surplus narrative. [1] But on the headlines side, developments involving Venezuela, Russia, and European sanctions are keeping risk discussions alive—especially in LNG and shipping-linked names. [2]
Below is what matters most for investors tracking energy stocks—from integrated oil majors and E&Ps to pipelines, refiners, oilfield services, LNG exporters, and gas-heavy producers—based on news and analysis dated Dec. 25, 2025 and the latest major forecasts available as of today.
Even with market activity muted around Christmas, oil’s “signal” for equity investors remains clear: prices are still struggling, and multiple forecasters expect the market to remain well supplied next year.
Recent pricing context:
For energy stocks, this matters because upstream cash flows (especially unhedged shale producers and international E&Ps) are still strongly linked to crude benchmarks. But the market is also showing that equities don’t always mirror barrels—and 2025 is becoming the textbook example.
Barron’s highlighted that despite a steep 2025 drop in WTI, energy stocks held up better than many expected, helped by shareholder returns and cost discipline among large producers. [5]
Takeaway: Oil is not screaming “boom,” but equity resilience is real—especially where dividends, buybacks, and diversified earnings streams soften the blow.
The most-cited anchor forecast in U.S. markets remains the U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA).
In its December 2025 Short-Term Energy Outlook, the EIA forecast:
EIA also expects OPEC+ to undershoot targets (in effect tightening relative to headline quotas), forecasting OPEC+ output about 1.3 million b/d less than targeted production in 2026, alongside continued Chinese stock-building that can dampen near-term downside. [7]
On the bank side, Reuters reported Goldman Sachs projecting lower oil prices in 2026, with Brent averaging $56/bbl and WTI $52/bbl, unless major supply shocks or deeper OPEC cuts change the equation. [8]
What this means for energy stocks:
A mid-$50s Brent world doesn’t automatically crush energy equities—especially if producers maintain:
But it does raise the bar: companies must out-execute rather than rely on price tailwinds.
Dec. 25’s headlines underscored a key nuance: even if the oil market is structurally well supplied, political disruption risk still exists, and it tends to matter most at the margins—shipping, sanctions compliance, and regional supply chains.
Russia compared a reported U.S.-ordered “quarantine” of Venezuelan waters to “piracy,” a reminder that even a small probability of disruption can influence short-dated pricing and sentiment in oil-sensitive names. [9]
Reuters reported Serbia backing talks involving Hungary’s MOL and Russian stakeholders over NIS, a sanctioned Serbian oil firm. The story highlighted that while OFAC reportedly allowed negotiations until March 24, the firm still lacked an operating license to buy and refine crude, contributing to a refinery shutdown dynamic. [10]
Equity implication: Refiners, regional distributors, and logistics-linked players can see outsized effects from sanctions mechanics—even when global benchmark prices are calm.
If oil is the baseline, LNG is increasingly the growth (and geopolitics) story—especially for gas producers, exporters, and midstream names tied to liquefaction and pipelines.
On Dec. 25, Reuters reported Russia delaying its target of producing 100 million tons/year of LNG by “several years” due to sanctions, with revised strategy numbers pointing to 90–105 million tons by 2030 and up to 130 million tons by 2036. [11]
At the same time, gas flows to Asia remain central. Reuters reported Gazprom saying gas supplies to China would reach 38.8 bcm in 2025—about 1 bcm above contractual obligations—and are expected to rise to 40 bcm in 2026. [12]
Why this matters for energy stocks:
While oil has been sliding, U.S. natural gas has been the more volatile energy tape—especially with winter weather and storage expectations driving sharp moves.
An Investing.com market note published today pointed to a forecast -158 Bcf storage withdrawal (week ending Dec. 19), which would push inventories to 3,420 Bcf, described as below both the prior year and five-year average benchmarks cited in the analysis. [13]
Meanwhile, the EIA’s STEO raised its winter gas view:
And despite a lower rig count trend, Reuters reported Baker Hughes data showing U.S. energy firms added rigs in the week ending Dec. 23 (released early for the holiday), with oil rigs at 409 and total rigs at 545. [15]
Equity implication: Gas-heavy producers can outperform even in a weak-oil year when:
But the risk cuts both ways—weather shifts can reverse pricing quickly.
For refiners and integrated majors, the downstream side can sometimes offset weaker crude—especially when product markets are tight.
On Dec. 25, Reuters reported China issued its first batch of 2026 refined fuel export quotas:
Separately, EIA’s STEO flagged that refining margins have been influenced by constrained global refinery production and sanctions-related trade shifts, while still expecting supportive margin dynamics into 2026 compared to 2025 (with uncertainty). [17]
Why investors care:
China’s quota policy affects Asia’s product flows, which can ripple into:
Energy stocks rarely move as one group for long. Here’s how today’s news-and-forecast mix tends to sort the subsectors:
Majors often fare better in weak crude periods because they combine upstream earnings with refining/marketing and trading. The 2025 pattern of oil prices falling while large energy equities held up has been linked to cost discipline, buybacks, and dividend support in market commentary. [18]
If EIA’s ~$51 WTI 2026 average holds, the winners are usually those with:
LNG delays in Russia and continued Asia demand signals keep infrastructure optionality valuable, even if commodity prices are soft. [20]
China’s steady quotas and EIA’s margin discussion reinforce that refiners can still have earnings power even when crude is weak—depending on product tightness and regional outages. [21]
Rig counts and upstream budget restraint can pressure pricing for drill-bit-exposed services, even if production stays high due to efficiency. [22]
EIA expects U.S. electricity generation growth to continue into 2026, driven in part by large loads like data centers, concentrated in regions such as ERCOT and PJM. [23]
That matters for gas demand, grid investment, and firms tied to power infrastructure.
As of Dec. 25, 2025, the dominant setup for energy equities looks like this:
For investors, that means 2026 is likely to reward selectivity: the companies that can defend margins and returns in a mid-cycle price environment may continue to outperform—even if the barrel itself stays under pressure.
This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute investment advice.
1. www.reuters.com, 2. www.reuters.com, 3. www.reuters.com, 4. www.reuters.com, 5. www.barrons.com, 6. www.eia.gov, 7. www.eia.gov, 8. www.reuters.com, 9. www.reuters.com, 10. www.reuters.com, 11. www.reuters.com, 12. www.reuters.com, 13. www.investing.com, 14. www.eia.gov, 15. www.reuters.com, 16. www.reuters.com, 17. www.eia.gov, 18. www.barrons.com, 19. www.eia.gov, 20. www.reuters.com, 21. www.reuters.com, 22. www.reuters.com, 23. www.eia.gov, 24. www.eia.gov, 25. www.eia.gov, 26. www.reuters.com, 27. www.investing.com, 28. www.reuters.com, 29. www.eia.gov, 30. www.eia.gov, 31. www.reuters.com, 32. www.barrons.com
Cardano (ADA) continues to trade under pressure as technical weakness on lower timeframes contrasts with fresh signals from its development ecosystem. On the 4-hour chart, ADA remains stuck in a short-term downtrend, reflecting cautious sentiment across the broader crypto market. Price action shows sellers controlling rebounds, while buyers struggle to reclaim key technical levels.
ADA trades near $0.36 after repeated failures to regain momentum following its mid-December peak. The 4-hour structure shows consistent lower highs and lower lows, confirming a b…
Read The Full Article Cardano Price Prediction: ADA Faces Pressure as Developers Push Midnight Expansion On Coin Edition.
December 25, 2025 — Silver prices are pausing near historic highs on Christmas Day, after a blistering year-end rally pushed spot silver into fresh record territory. With many major financial markets shut or running on holiday-thin liquidity, today’s price action is less about fresh positioning and more about consolidation — but the bigger story is that silver has entered what several analysts describe as “price discovery” after breaking multi-year resistance and posting one of its strongest years on record. [1]
Spot silver was around $71.9 per ounce on December 25, 2025, according to TradingEconomics, effectively flat on the day and just below the latest all-time highs logged this week. [2]
That “just below” matters: Reuters reported silver hit an all-time high near $72.70 before easing back toward $71.94 in a modest pullback described as profit-taking after a record run. [3]
Futures snapshots tell a similar holiday story. Investing.com listed silver futures around $71.875 with volume shown as 0—a reminder that Christmas conditions can freeze normal trading and make “today’s” levels look static until liquidity returns. [4]
The dominant macro driver behind precious metals’ year-end surge has been the market’s conviction that U.S. monetary policy will keep easing. Reuters noted the Federal Reserve cut rates three times in 2025, and traders were pricing two more cuts next year—a classic supportive backdrop for non-yielding assets like gold and silver. [5]
Other Reuters reporting through the week echoed the same theme: softer labor and inflation signals bolstered the case for additional rate cuts, while analysts highlighted that silver has been “leading” gold at points during the rally. [6]
A weaker dollar typically makes dollar-priced commodities more attractive to non-U.S. buyers. Reuters described the dollar as having slumped significantly in 2025, helping to power the precious-metals surge. [7]
Silver is unusual because it straddles two roles: a precious metal with safe-haven appeal and a critical industrial input. Reuters coverage tied the precious-metals rally to rising geopolitical tensions and trade-related uncertainty, including developments linked to Venezuela. [8]
Multiple analysts point to the same structural issue underneath the rally: silver has been running a deficit for years, and physical tightness has become harder to ignore as prices climb.
In a market like silver — smaller than gold and increasingly demanded by industry — persistent deficits can create the kind of “air pocket” dynamics that turn rallies into breakouts.
Silver’s industrial profile is central to the bullish thesis because it links the metal to long-duration themes like electrification and data infrastructure.
ING emphasized that industrial demand accounts for more than half of total silver consumption, and while solar growth may slow after peak installation years in China, demand tailwinds remain from electrification, grid upgrades, and increased silver content in automotive components (including hybrids and EVs). [11]
IG’s 2026 outlook went further, arguing demand remains broad-based across solar, EVs, semiconductors, 5G, and AI-related power infrastructure, while also highlighting how hard substitution can be in performance-sensitive applications. [12]
Reuters also framed silver’s “perfect storm” as a blend of investment demand and the industrial pull from AI data centers, solar, and EVs, with momentum buying layered on top. [13]
Holiday sessions hide volatility — but they don’t remove the deeper plumbing issues that can whip silver around when markets reopen.
ING flagged a set of conditions that help explain why silver can spike or gap more aggressively than gold:
Reuters reporting earlier in the month also linked tariff concerns to physical dislocations and liquidity stress in the London spot market, reinforcing the idea that silver’s rally is not purely “paper-driven.” [15]
Forecasts for silver in 2026 are wide — and that dispersion is itself a signal. Silver is historically volatile, and analysts are splitting into two camps: “bank-base-case” pricing and “breakout-extension” pricing.
This is a critical takeaway for readers: even relatively “measured” forecasts still imply silver stays far above the levels that defined most of the pre-breakout decade.
Several market professionals quoted in Reuters pointed to $75 as a psychologically and technically important milestone:
IG outlined a more technical pathway: once silver cleared the long-term ceiling and held above it, the next measured-move extensions in their framework pointed to $72 and $88. [21]
One nuance here is timing: silver is already flirting with the low-$70s zone now. That means the “$72” area is no longer a distant projection — it’s becoming a near-term battleground where traders will judge whether the breakout is consolidating or exhausting.
Silver’s outperformance has also shown up in the gold-silver ratio, a long-followed measure of how many ounces of silver it takes to buy one ounce of gold.
Reuters reported the gold-silver ratio narrowed to around 64 from about 105 in April, reflecting how aggressively silver has caught up during the year-end sprint. [22]
IG noted that long-run historical averages are often discussed in the 40–60 zone, and argued that further compression would imply additional relative strength for silver — even if gold prices merely hold steady. [23]
Because today is holiday-thinned, most technical notes are anchored to the last “normal” session’s close and framed as setups for when markets reopen.
From a news-reader standpoint, the technical message is straightforward: the uptrend remains intact above the low-$70s/high-$60s supports, but the market is extended enough that sharp pullbacks are possible — especially once liquidity returns and year-end portfolio rebalancing resumes.
India is a key demand center for physical silver, and local-market commentary has turned increasingly bullish.
The Times of India highlighted analyst commentary pointing to a breakout structure in MCX Silver, with support near 215,000 and an upside target around 240,000 (pricing in rupees terms on the exchange). [26]
Even for global readers who don’t trade MCX, this matters because India’s import demand and retail participation can influence physical flows — a theme Reuters has also referenced in discussing drivers of silver’s record highs. [27]
As of December 25, 2025, silver is consolidating near $72/oz, after printing fresh records and capping a year defined by falling-rate expectations, a weaker dollar, geopolitical risk, and a widely cited multi-year supply deficit. [33]
For 2026, mainstream forecasts cluster around the mid-to-high $50s on average (with upside cases), while several strategists continue to flag $75 as a plausible milestone if macro tailwinds and physical tightness persist. [34]
The caution is embedded in the same story: silver’s market structure and dual-demand profile make it prone to steep corrections, especially when positioning gets crowded — meaning the next leg up, if it comes, may not be a straight line. [35]
This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute investment advice.
1. tradingeconomics.com, 2. tradingeconomics.com, 3. www.reuters.com, 4. www.investing.com, 5. www.reuters.com, 6. www.reuters.com, 7. www.reuters.com, 8. www.reuters.com, 9. www.reuters.com, 10. silverinstitute.org, 11. think.ing.com, 12. www.ig.com, 13. www.reuters.com, 14. think.ing.com, 15. www.reuters.com, 16. www.reuters.com, 17. www.ig.com, 18. www.reuters.com, 19. www.reuters.com, 20. www.reuters.com, 21. www.ig.com, 22. www.reuters.com, 23. www.ig.com, 24. www.fxempire.com, 25. www.fxleaders.com, 26. timesofindia.indiatimes.com, 27. www.reuters.com, 28. www.reuters.com, 29. www.reuters.com, 30. www.reuters.com, 31. think.ing.com, 32. think.ing.com, 33. tradingeconomics.com, 34. www.reuters.com, 35. www.reuters.com
XRP price action is staying surprisingly active for Christmas Day, even as many markets are operating with thinner liquidity and lighter participation. As of the latest available data on December 25, 2025, XRP is trading around $1.87, modestly higher on the day after dipping and rebounding back into the mid‑$1.80s. [1]
The bigger story isn’t a sudden breakout—it’s the growing tension between institutional-style demand (via newly launched U.S. spot XRP ETFs) and a spot price that remains stuck in a narrow range, with multiple outlets pointing to key levels around $1.77 (support) and $1.98 (resistance) as the near-term “decision zone.” [2]
Below is a full roundup of today’s (25.12.2025) XRP news, forecasts, and market analyses, plus what they imply for the next few sessions.
Market pricing late on Dec. 25 shows XRP hovering around $1.87, after an intraday move that included a pullback and quick recovery. [3]
Trading coverage on the day described XRP spending much of the session around the $1.86 area, dipping, and then being pushed back toward $1.87—a “green on Christmas” narrative driven more by a rebound than by a trend change. [4]
One important nuance: some same-day analyses referenced XRP closer to the $1.80 region (often because they’re framing a support test rather than the latest tick). That difference is typical on volatile days, and it underscores why traders are treating the current tape as a range market, not a breakout. [5]
Across the day’s reporting and analysis, three themes keep repeating:
Multiple Dec. 25 writeups point to continued ETF demand as a supportive backdrop, with combined inflows reported around $1.13B and assets under management above $1.2B (figures cited in market commentary). [6]
At least one widely circulated headline framing today is blunt: ETF assets have climbed toward/above ~$1.25B, but XRP price has “stalled” in its trading range. [7]
That divergence matters because it suggests one (or more) of the following may be happening simultaneously:
One of today’s most concrete micro-signals came from liquidation data cited in market coverage: in a one-hour window, liquidations skewed heavily toward shorts, consistent with a quick dip being bought and sellers getting squeezed out. [8]
This doesn’t automatically translate into a sustained rally—but it helps explain why XRP can look “flat” on the day while still producing tradable intraday swings.
A Dec. 25 analysis piece highlighted “fear zone” conditions for XRP sentiment (attributed to Santiment) and argued that extreme negativity has historically coincided with stabilization and rebounds in some instances. [9]
That same analysis also cited on-chain exchange supply dynamics: XRP balances on Binance were described as falling to their lowest level since July 2024, which—if accurate—can reduce immediate sell pressure and amplify price sensitivity to incremental demand. [10]
Whether you’re bullish or bearish, it’s hard to cover XRP in late 2025 without acknowledging that U.S. spot XRP ETF launches changed the market structure—creating a regulated on-ramp for allocators who won’t custody tokens directly.
A quick snapshot of the key products and launches frequently referenced in XRP coverage:
The market’s immediate takeaway from today’s coverage: ETFs can generate steady demand without instantly “fixing” price action—especially when broader crypto sentiment is weak and technical overhead resistance remains heavy. [16]
While exact levels vary by analyst and timeframe, today’s most repeated zones are remarkably consistent across outlets:
Put simply, today’s technical commentary paints a market where:
One of the more detailed Dec. 25 analyses pointed to cautious whale adding across two large-holder cohorts, estimating roughly $200 million worth of net additions based on changes in wallet cohort balances over the prior few days. [25]
The tone of that analysis is important: it does not claim aggressive accumulation. Instead, it frames whale behavior as a supportive “tailwind” that could help a reversal if price confirms by clearing resistance levels. [26]
Separately, the “exchange reserves down” angle—especially focused on Binance balances—has been used today as an argument that sell-side supply may be tightening. [27]
A recurring debate in XRP coverage today is the gap between Ripple’s ecosystem milestones and XRP’s token performance.
One widely distributed finance piece noted that Ripple has processed $95B in payments, while also arguing that XRP’s 2025 price performance shows adoption metrics and token price don’t always move in lockstep. [28]
This line of thinking matches a broader theme you’ll see in many XRP discussions: even if Ripple’s payments and infrastructure business expands, XRP’s price still depends on market structure, liquidity, regulatory framing, and how much of that activity meaningfully translates into sustained XRP demand.
Forecasts are not guarantees—especially in crypto—but today’s “prediction stack” is useful because it shows where expectations cluster.
One widely referenced monthly forecast projected XRP could end December 2025 around $1.87, with a band near $1.82–$1.87. [31]
This is notable because it aligns with what traders are seeing on the chart: price action compressing near a decision area, with neither side convincingly breaking control.
Some of today’s most viral XRP content isn’t classic technical analysis—it’s scenario modeling based on institutional adoption narratives.
A Dec. 25 commentary framed Japan as a potential first “full-scale institutional use case” for XRP due to FX volatility and existing Ripple-linked relationships (notably SBI). It laid out scenario ranges such as $3–$5 (base), $8–$12 (optimistic), and $15+ (aggressive)—explicitly presented as modeled paths, not forecasts. [32]
Another Dec. 25 piece suggested that after retail-driven ETF demand, the “next phase” could involve pension funds and insurers, and it included chatbot-based scenario math (for example, hypothetical $10B–$20B incremental inflows and “multiplier effect” logic). This is inherently speculative, but it’s clearly part of today’s XRP discourse. [33]
For a Google News–style framing, the key takeaway is: the narrative bid for XRP is increasingly institutional, but the market still wants confirmation in the form of price reclaiming major resistance levels.
Even on a holiday, XRP’s price is trading inside a 2025 context shaped by regulation and market access.
Earlier in 2025, Reuters reported the SEC dropped its appeal in the long-running Ripple case, following a district court decision (a milestone frequently cited as part of the “regulatory clarity” arc around XRP). [34]
And Reuters also covered Ripple-backed Evernorth’s plan to raise over $1B via a Nasdaq listing to build an XRP-focused treasury strategy—another example of crypto’s growing integration with public-market structures. [35]
Those aren’t “Dec. 25 breaking news” items, but they help explain why spot XRP ETFs exist in late 2025 and why institutional flows are now a daily part of the XRP market conversation.
If you’re tracking XRP into the final days of 2025, today’s coverage suggests a practical checklist:
On Dec. 25, 2025, XRP is not “doing nothing.” It’s compressing—with price near $1.87, sentiment described as deeply negative in parts of the market, and a steady flow of ETF-driven institutional interest building underneath the chart. [40]
That combination is exactly what fuels the current debate: whether XRP is quietly building a base ahead of a reclaim of the $2 handle—or whether overhead resistance and weak risk appetite keep it trapped (or push it lower) into year-end.
The next decisive move likely hinges less on Christmas-day candles and more on whether XRP can defend $1.77 and break $1.98 in the sessions that follow. [41]
1. u.today, 2. beincrypto.com, 3. u.today, 4. u.today, 5. www.fxleaders.com, 6. www.fxleaders.com, 7. www.mexc.co, 8. u.today, 9. www.fxleaders.com, 10. www.fxleaders.com, 11. www.etf.com, 12. bitwiseinvestments.com, 13. www.franklintempleton.com, 14. etfs.grayscale.com, 15. www.21shares.com, 16. www.fxleaders.com, 17. beincrypto.com, 18. www.fxleaders.com, 19. www.fxleaders.com, 20. beincrypto.com, 21. beincrypto.com, 22. www.fxleaders.com, 23. beincrypto.com, 24. beincrypto.com, 25. beincrypto.com, 26. beincrypto.com, 27. www.fxleaders.com, 28. finance.yahoo.com, 29. www.binance.com, 30. coincodex.com, 31. changelly.com, 32. thecryptobasic.com, 33. thecryptobasic.com, 34. www.reuters.com, 35. www.reuters.com, 36. beincrypto.com, 37. beincrypto.com, 38. www.fxleaders.com, 39. www.fxleaders.com, 40. www.fxleaders.com, 41. beincrypto.com
December 25, 2025 — Gold is entering the Christmas break near historic highs after a dramatic late‑year surge that pushed the metal through the psychological $4,500 per ounce level and up to fresh records earlier this week. In holiday-thinned conditions, spot gold has been hovering around the mid‑$4,400s to ~$4,480, following an intraday record near $4,525 set during Christmas Eve trading. [1]
The bigger story, however, is not just “gold price today” — it’s why the rally has been so relentless into year-end, and what major banks and market strategists think happens next in 2026, with forecasts clustering from the low‑$4,000s to $5,000+ depending on interest rates, the U.S. dollar, geopolitics, and the pace of central‑bank and ETF buying. [2]
Gold trading is typically quieter around Christmas, and this year is no exception: liquidity has been thin and the market is pausing after a powerful run. Spot gold was last reported around $4,479 in the final active session before Christmas Day, after touching a record near $4,525 earlier in the day; U.S. gold futures were also around $4,481 in that session. [3]
Several market updates published on Dec. 25 describe gold as “steady” or “stabilizing” after the breakout above $4,500, with traders starting to lock in gains as the year closes. [4]
Gold’s late‑2025 rally is being powered by a rare alignment of macro and structural forces — some of which are cyclical (rates, the dollar), and some of which look longer‑lasting (central bank diversification, ETF flows, and a broadened investor base).
Gold tends to benefit when markets expect easier monetary policy, because bullion doesn’t pay interest — so falling yields reduce the opportunity cost of holding it. Reuters reporting this week highlighted that markets have been pricing in additional U.S. rate cuts in 2026, supporting gold’s appeal. [5]
A softer dollar can mechanically support gold (priced in dollars) by making it cheaper for non‑U.S. buyers. Reuters has noted the dollar’s notable decline in 2025 and the view among many investors that weakness could extend into 2026 — one reason precious metals demand has remained strong into the holiday period. [6]
Safe‑haven buying has been repeatedly cited as a catalyst in the latest leg higher, including tensions linked to the Middle East, uncertainty around Ukraine‑Russia dynamics, and the recent focus on U.S. actions tied to Venezuelan tankers. [7]
Beyond day‑to‑day headlines, broader policy uncertainty has become part of the gold narrative. Financial Times’ year‑in‑review framing points to tariff turmoil and market instability as major themes of 2025, with gold a standout beneficiary amid a “gold rush” driven by central banks and retail investors. [8]
If rate expectations and geopolitics explain the timing of the latest surge, the foundation of this bull market is increasingly described as structural.
Reuters reporting on the year-end rally cited Metals Focus estimates that central banks are on track to buy about 850 tonnes of gold in 2025 (down from 2024 but still sizable), and analysts expect elevated official-sector demand to remain a key pillar into 2026. [9]
In a separate Reuters deep dive on “what fuels the market,” the same structural theme comes through: gold’s surge has been linked to robust central‑bank buying and diversification trends alongside rate-cut bets and safe-haven flows. [10]
Gold ETFs have also reasserted themselves as a major demand channel:
That ETF persistence matters for price: it signals institutional and retail participation beyond short-term “fear trades,” reinforcing the idea that gold is increasingly treated as a strategic allocation rather than a tactical hedge. [13]
The week’s price behavior has looked like a classic “breakout then breathe” pattern.
One widely cited technical takeaway: even after the pullback, gold remains in a powerful uptrend, and some market commentary continues to flag the potential for another leg higher once liquidity returns after the holiday lull. [17]
Gold’s global surge is showing up in local markets too. In India, Business Standard reported sharp moves in domestic bullion prices on Dec. 25, with 24K gold (10 grams) quoted around ₹1,38,940 and 22K gold (10 grams) around ₹1,27,330, alongside a jump in silver prices. [18]
This divergence between soaring investment demand and pressured jewelry demand is also consistent with Metals Focus commentary cited by Reuters: high prices have weighed on jewelry consumption in India even as bar-and-coin investment has held up better. [19]
The most important question for investors heading into 2026 is whether gold’s extraordinary 2025 performance sets up a correction — or whether the rally is simply shifting into a slower, higher‑plateau phase.
Here’s what major published forecasts and analyst notes are saying right now:
Goldman Sachs sees gold rising to $4,900/oz by December 2026 in its base case, driven by structurally high central bank demand and cyclical support from U.S. Fed rate cuts — with potential upside if private-investor diversification broadens. [20]
J.P. Morgan has been among the most prominent bulls. Reuters reported the bank forecasting gold could average $5,055/oz by Q4 2026, with assumptions that investor demand and central bank buying average around 566 tonnes per quarter in 2026. The same Reuters report also reiterated J.P. Morgan’s longer-term target of $6,000/oz by 2028. [21]
A separate Reuters analysis on 2026 forecasting also grouped J.P. Morgan with Bank of America and Metals Focus in seeing $5,000 as reachable in 2026, even if the pace of gains slows compared with 2025. [22]
Reuters’ Dec. 17 survey-style reporting captured how dispersed the outlook is:
Meanwhile, some media summaries published this week note that several banks broadly cluster expectations for 2026 trading in the $4,500–$4,700 zone, with upside scenarios toward $5,000 if macro uncertainty remains elevated. [27]
Even gold bulls are increasingly careful about one thing: after a 60–70% year, volatility cuts both ways.
The main downside risks highlighted across current reporting include:
In short: the structural story may be supportive, but the path is unlikely to be smooth.
Once full liquidity returns after the holidays, the gold market is likely to refocus on a clear set of catalysts:
As of Dec. 25, 2025, the gold price narrative is best described as strong trend, cautious tape: bulls still have the structural wind at their back (central banks + ETFs + diversification), but the market is also digesting an extraordinary year and heading into the new one with a wider forecast dispersion than usual — from “cool-off” scenarios in the low‑$4,000s to “new regime” calls at $5,000+. [37]
If you want, I can rewrite this in a more “wire-style” Google News format (shorter paragraphs, more attribution in-line, and a tighter nut graf) while keeping the same facts and SEO focus.
1. www.reuters.com, 2. www.reuters.com, 3. www.reuters.com, 4. www.fxleaders.com, 5. www.reuters.com, 6. www.reuters.com, 7. www.reuters.com, 8. www.ft.com, 9. www.reuters.com, 10. www.reuters.com, 11. www.reuters.com, 12. www.gold.org, 13. www.gold.org, 14. www.reuters.com, 15. www.investing.com, 16. www.fxleaders.com, 17. www.reuters.com, 18. www.business-standard.com, 19. www.reuters.com, 20. www.reuters.com, 21. www.reuters.com, 22. www.reuters.com, 23. www.reuters.com, 24. www.reuters.com, 25. www.reuters.com, 26. www.reuters.com, 27. www.businessinsider.com, 28. www.reuters.com, 29. www.reuters.com, 30. www.reuters.com, 31. www.reuters.com, 32. www.reuters.com, 33. www.reuters.com, 34. www.reuters.com, 35. www.gold.org, 36. www.reuters.com, 37. www.reuters.com
Law enforcement officers have uncovered new episodes concerning the activities of a criminal group that terrorized elderly residents of Ukraine with threats of prosecution for refusing to buy biologically active additives (BAAs – ed). The perpetrators were detained in early 2025: during the pre-trial investigation, law enforcement officers established new facts and identified other involved individuals. This was reported by UNN with reference to the National Police of Ukraine.
According to the investigation, members of the group used databases of individuals who had previously ordered medicines, after which they called the victims, introducing themselves as employees of the state executive service.
Under the pretext of “mandatory receipt of medicines,” the perpetrators exerted psychological pressure, threatened legal proceedings and confiscation of property if they refused to pick up the parcel at post offices. For mass calling of citizens, the defendants used IP telephony, which allowed them to conceal their real location and scale their criminal activities.
Currently, law enforcement officers have documented a hundred new episodes of the fraudsters’ criminal activity.
Within the framework of the criminal proceedings, 21 individuals – residents of Dnipropetrovsk and Kyiv regions – aged 17 to 44, have been notified of suspicion. The perpetrators are charged with creating, leading, and participating in a criminal organization (Part 1, 2 of Article 255), as well as extortion committed by a criminal organization (Part 4 of Article 28, Part 4 of Article 189 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine). A series of searches were conducted at the places of residence of the group members in Dnipropetrovsk, Kyiv, and Zaporizhzhia regions.
Law enforcement officers uncovered a scheme for legalizing over 578 million hryvnias obtained from defense contracts. Enterprise officials acted in collusion with a “conversion center,” withdrawing budget funds through forged documents.
Alvin Lang
Dec 25, 2025 09:55
MATIC price prediction suggests potential 32% rally to $0.50 as Polygon technical analysis reveals oversold conditions near $0.35 support with medium-term targets of $0.45-$0.58.
Polygon’s MATIC token is positioned at a critical juncture as technical indicators suggest a potential recovery phase after testing key support levels. With the current price hovering around $0.38, our comprehensive MATIC price prediction analysis reveals both immediate opportunities and risks for traders considering their next move.
• MATIC short-term target (1 week): $0.42 (+11% from current levels)
• Polygon medium-term forecast (1 month): $0.45-$0.50 range (18-32% upside potential)
• Key level to break for bullish continuation: $0.58 (critical resistance)
• Critical support if bearish: $0.35 (immediate) / $0.33 (strong support)
The latest analyst sentiment around MATIC reveals a cautiously optimistic outlook. Recent predictions from Blockchain.News have consistently highlighted the $0.45-$0.58 range as achievable targets, with December 24th analysis suggesting an 18-32% rally potential as MATIC approaches the critical $0.42 resistance level.
The consensus among analysts points to a medium-confidence Polygon forecast that depends heavily on breaking through the $0.58 resistance zone. What’s particularly noteworthy is the consistency in targeting the $0.45-$0.50 range across multiple predictions, suggesting this MATIC price target has strong technical backing rather than speculative optimism.
Contrarian views remain focused on the downside risk if the $0.35 support fails to hold, which would invalidate the current bullish thesis and potentially send MATIC toward the $0.33 strong support level.
The current Polygon technical analysis presents a mixed but increasingly constructive picture. With MATIC trading at $0.38, the token sits just above the 7-day SMA of $0.37, indicating short-term stability despite recent weakness.
The RSI reading of 38.00 positions MATIC in neutral territory with room for upward movement before reaching overbought conditions. This supports our MATIC price prediction for near-term recovery potential. However, the MACD histogram at -0.0045 continues to show bearish momentum, suggesting any rally may face initial resistance.
Key technical factors supporting recovery include MATIC’s position within the Bollinger Bands at 0.29, indicating the token is trading closer to the lower band ($0.31) than the upper band ($0.56). This oversold positioning often precedes corrective rallies, particularly when combined with the current support holding at $0.35.
Volume analysis shows moderate activity at $1.07 million on Binance spot, which needs to increase significantly to confirm any breakout above the immediate resistance at $0.42.
The primary MATIC price target in the bullish scenario centers on the $0.50 level, representing a 32% gain from current prices. This target aligns with the 50-day SMA at $0.45, which often acts as dynamic resistance during recovery phases.
For this bullish case to materialize, MATIC needs to decisively break above the immediate resistance at $0.42 (20-day SMA) on increased volume. A successful break would likely trigger momentum toward $0.45, with the ultimate target of $0.58 representing the key resistance level that could unlock further gains toward the upper Bollinger Band at $0.56.
The technical setup supports this Polygon forecast as the Stochastic indicators (%K at 25.19, %D at 19.74) suggest MATIC is approaching oversold levels, creating conditions for a technical bounce.
The bearish scenario becomes active if MATIC fails to hold the $0.35 support level. A break below this critical support would target the strong support at $0.33, representing a 13% decline from current levels.
Risk factors include the bearish MACD momentum and the significant distance from the 200-day SMA at $0.69, indicating the longer-term trend remains challenged. Additionally, any broader crypto market weakness could pressure MATIC below key support levels regardless of individual technical factors.
Based on our analysis, the decision to buy or sell MATIC depends on risk tolerance and entry timing. Conservative investors should wait for a confirmed break above $0.42 with increased volume before considering entry.
For those willing to accept higher risk, current levels around $0.38 offer an attractive risk-reward ratio with a stop-loss at $0.34 (just below the $0.35 support). This provides approximately 3% downside risk against potential 18-32% upside to our target range.
Position sizing should account for MATIC’s daily ATR of $0.03, indicating moderate volatility that could provide both opportunities and risks for shorter-term traders.
Our MATIC price prediction targets a recovery to the $0.45-$0.50 range within the next 4-6 weeks, representing 18-32% upside potential from current levels. This Polygon forecast carries medium confidence based on technical indicators showing oversold conditions and analyst consensus around similar price targets.
Key indicators to monitor include RSI movement above 45 for momentum confirmation, MACD histogram turning positive, and most critically, a volume-supported break above the $0.42 resistance level. Failure to hold $0.35 support would invalidate this bullish thesis and require reassessment of the prediction timeline.
The prediction timeline extends through late January 2026, with initial confirmation signals expected within the next 1-2 weeks as MATIC either breaks resistance or tests lower support levels.
Image source: Shutterstock