Multi-Timeframe Support Alignment

Last week’s low at $4.09 stands as a higher monthly low; a decisive break there would trigger a monthly reversal signal. Meanwhile, Thursday produced a five-week low hovering just above the rising 10-week average near $4.14, perfectly aligning with the current $4.24–$4.15 zone and dramatically increasing its technical importance as dynamic support.

First Weekly Loss in Eight Weeks

This week marks the first weekly decline in eight weeks, ending the unbroken pattern of higher weekly highs and lows. That alone represents a major sentiment shift, with the weekly reversal now confirmed and opening risk of a deeper correction toward the 61.8% Fibonacci retracement at $3.89 and the 200-day average near $3.79—though a meaningful bounce appears probable first.

Classic Downtrend Progression

As natural gas has sold off from last week’s multi-year high of $5.50 (since December 2022), each successive dynamic support line has flipped to resistance: first the 10-day average, then the 20-day average—both confirmed by subsequent daily highs. This textbook progression reinforces the short-term downtrend and keeps bears in the driver’s seat.

Highest-Probability Bounce Zone

The strongest and most likely bounce area remains the rising 50-day average at $4.05. Because it continues climbing, it may meet price closer to the lower end of the current $4.15 range, improving the odds of a successful defense and potential sustained bullish reaction into overhead resistance.

Outlook

Natural gas has shifted decisively bearish on the weekly timeframe with the eight-week higher low structure broken and classic support-to-resistance flips in place. Expect the $4.24–$4.15 zone to slow the decline, but the 50-day/channel confluence near $4.05 stands as the highest-probability bounce point; failure there opens a fast move toward $3.89–$3.79, while any rebound faces immediate resistance at the flipped 20-day and 10-day averages.

For a look at all of today’s economic events, check out our economic calendar.

Natural Gas NG=F Under Pressure After A 20% Slide From Three-Year High

Short-Term Damage: From Peaks Above $5.10 To The $4.25–$4.33 Zone

Front-month NG=F has given back the entire weather-driven spike and is now trading in the mid-$4s, around $4.28–$4.33 per mmBtu, after dropping roughly $0.85 in a single week, an 8–9% hit layered on top of a broader 20% retreat from the three-year high reached just a week earlier. A week ago, futures sat about $1 higher and briefly priced in an aggressive winter risk premium; today they trade near $4.25, even dipping to a five-week low as sellers force the market below key technical reference points. The price is now marginally under the Energy Information Administration’s updated heating-season average of $4.30 per mmBtu, despite that estimate itself being raised by roughly 10% versus the prior outlook to reflect early-season cold. The message is simple: the strip became too crowded on the upside, weather expectations flipped, and NG=F is repricing lower to reflect less urgent winter tightness.

Weather Whiplash: From Subfreezing Demand Spike To Mild-Into-Christmas Drag On NG=F

The entire move is being driven by a violent swing in weather expectations. Last week’s pattern delivered exactly what bulls wanted: widespread cold across the Midwest and Northeast, with daytime highs in the 10s–30s °F and subfreezing overnight lows, pushing national demand sharply higher and justifying heavy storage withdrawals. That brief window of strong heating demand has now been eclipsed by models projecting above-normal temperatures across most of the Lower 48 from next week through at least December 26. Forecast houses now describe a cold weekend followed by a pronounced warm bias into Christmas, which effectively caps heating loads during what should be the peak of the season. Two-week heating degree days are sitting at 381 versus a 10-year norm of 382 but well below the 30-year norm of 429, signaling that the current cold is not exceptional on a historical basis and that the medium-term pattern is still structurally mild. Traders are no longer willing to pay a winter scarcity premium if the second half of December looks more like a shoulder period than a deep-freeze.

Storage Dynamics: 177 Bcf Withdrawal, 3,746 Bcf In The Ground, And Why Bears Still Dominate

On the surface, the storage data looks bullish. The latest weekly report showed a 177 Bcf withdrawal for the week ended December 5, exceeding the consensus range around -166 to -174 Bcf and dwarfing the five-year average draw of roughly -89 Bcf for this time of year. Last year’s comparable withdrawal was 167 Bcf, so the current pull is larger than both the recent past and the medium-term norm. That confirms that last week’s cold snap genuinely bit into inventories. Yet even after this “massive pull,” total U.S. storage stands near 3,746 Bcf versus 3,774 Bcf a year ago and around 3,643 Bcf for the five-year average, leaving stocks roughly 2.8–3.0% above normal despite the outsized draw. The structural issue all year has been excessive storage: injections were fat through 2025 because production ran at record levels while demand never spiked enough to meaningfully erode the surplus. The current withdrawal merely trims an overhang that was 5.1% above the five-year norm just a week earlier. As long as inventories remain ahead of typical levels going into the core of winter, each large draw gets framed as a temporary weather echo rather than the start of a sustained tightening cycle.

Supply Surge: 109.7 bcfd Output, Record LNG Feedgas And Global Benchmarks Pressuring NG=F

The production side of the balance sheet is relentless. Lower-48 dry gas output is running at about 109.7 bcfd so far in December, marginally above the 109.6 bcfd record set in November and nearly 5 bcfd higher than the roughly 104.6 bcfd level seen a year earlier. When Canadian imports of roughly 10.2 bcfd and small LNG imports are included, total U.S. supply is around 120 bcfd, far above the 108.3 bcfd five-year average for this month. On the demand side, aggregate U.S. usage including exports is about 145.4 bcfd this week, projected to ease to 143.8 bcfd next week as the weather warms, compared with roughly 129.5 bcfd for the five-year average. So demand is robust, but supply is so strong that storage remains comfortable even with heavy withdrawals. LNG feedgas flows are near record territory at 18.7–18.9 bcfd, up from 18.2 bcfd in November and around 13.7 bcfd a year ago, with exports on track to hit a new high for the tenth consecutive year. Yet global benchmarks are not providing much relief: European TTF prices hover near $9.20 per mmBtu and Asian JKM around $10.78, while Henry Hub trades near $4.48–$4.62. That spread is healthy enough to support U.S. exports but not tight enough to trigger a panic bid. The combination of record domestic output, well-supplied global markets, and only moderately supportive international prices keeps a lid on any attempt by NG=F to sustain moves back above recent highs.

Technical Structure: Broken $4.495 Support, $4.39 Failure And $4.05–Sub-$4 Downside Risk

Technically, NG=F has shifted from an overextended bullish structure into a clear corrective phase. The first red flag was the decisive break below $4.495, a level aligning with the 50-day moving average and acting as a key pivot for systematic and trend-following flows. Once that floor gave way, algorithmic accounts and leveraged longs started liquidating, driving the contract through the prior swing low at $4.390 and exposing the late-October bottom around $4.052 as the next meaningful downside reference. The current tape around $4.28–$4.33 is uncomfortably close to that October low, and the recent price action has been characterized by big red candles and follow-through selling rather than sharp V-shaped reversals. Technicians now see the path of least resistance skewed toward at least a test of the $4.05 region and a realistic risk of a temporary break below $4.00 if weather models stay warm and storage draws continue to be framed as one-off events. The previous three-year high is now firmly established as resistance, and every failure to reclaim the $4.49–$4.60 congestion zone reinforces the view that the winter spike has already peaked.

Regional And Basis Signals: Henry Hub Anchored, New England Spikes And Permian Discounts

Underlying regional price behavior confirms that the weakness in NG=F is not simply a benchmark anomaly. Spot Henry Hub has slipped to about $4.62 versus $4.76 recently, broadly aligned with the front-month futures slide. However, regional differentials highlight how localized constraints are distorting signals. New England’s Algonquin Citygate is printing extreme numbers near $20.50 per mmBtu, up from around $16.55, reflecting pipeline limitations and winter reliability concerns in that constrained market. At the same time, Permian Waha prices are deeply negative around -$1.31 versus -$0.98 the prior day, exposing severe takeaway bottlenecks and periodic dumping of associated gas at distressed levels. Chicago Citygate sits near $4.35, Transco Zone 6 New York around $5.63, and PG&E Citygate roughly $3.75, underscoring a patchwork of tightness in some load pockets and oversupply in others. For NG=F, which reflects Henry Hub rather than local stress, the key takeaway is that the national system is adequately supplied. New England’s price spikes are a seasonal, infrastructure-driven phenomenon, while Permian discounts signal surplus molecules searching for demand rather than scarcity.

Demand Mix: Heating, Power Generation, LNG Exports And Data Center Uncertainty

On the consumption side, the demand stack is robust but not explosive. Commercial usage sits around 17.6–18.0 bcfd, residential demand approximately 29.6–30.3 bcfd, and industrial consumption near 26.0 bcfd. Power sector burn is roughly 32.7–34.9 bcfd, slightly down from last year’s record high and projected to soften as temperatures rise and coal, nuclear, wind and solar share some of the load. Gas still accounts for about 39–40% of U.S. power generation, but incremental growth from this segment is flattening for 2025 compared with the surge in 2024. Exports remain a bright spot: roughly 6.3 bcfd flows to Mexico, around 3.5 bcfd to Canada, and nearly 18.5–18.9 bcfd heads to LNG terminals. Even so, worries are emerging around the long-term trajectory of gas-fired power demand for data centers. A recent selloff in high-profile technology stocks linked to artificial intelligence infrastructure has raised questions about the pace and profitability of new data center build-out, which had been one of the pillars of bullish gas demand narratives. If power demand growth for data centers underperforms, gas burns for electricity could plateau or even decline at the margin, reducing one of the structural arguments for sustained high prices. For the current winter window, the dominant driver remains weather: national demand is projected to slip from about 145.4 bcfd this week to 143.8 bcfd next week, and that marginal downtick—from already elevated levels—matters more for price direction than the longer-term AI story.

Macro Backdrop For NG=F: Degree Days, Global Prices And Consumer Bills

The broader macro context supports a softer stance on NG=F for now. Degree-day data show that, while the recent cold was meaningful, the two-week total is not significantly above historical norms, and the forward projections are tilted toward warmth rather than sustained Arctic outbreaks. Global gas prices at roughly $9–$11 per mmBtu are far from crisis levels; they are high enough to keep U.S. LNG exports running hard but low enough to discourage panic hedging from overseas buyers. Domestically, the recent 20% price drop from the three-year high has real implications for heating bills: with NG=F around $4.25 instead of above $5, the implied cost trajectory for winter is easing, differing notably from early-season fears of a punishing heating season. For utilities and large end-users, this environment encourages more measured hedging rather than frantic procurement, which in turn removes one source of upside pressure from the futures curve.

Scenario Framework For NG=F Into Year-End And Early 2026

From here, the near-term scenarios revolve around three interacting variables: weather, storage, and production discipline. In a continued warm-into-Christmas path with withdrawals roughly in line with the current 170 Bcf range, NG=F is likely to probe the $4.05 October low and may briefly crack below $4.00 as speculative longs capitulate. In a moderate scenario where the next storage print surprises on the high side of expectations and weather models reintroduce a colder pattern for late December and early January, the contract could stabilize in a $4.20–$4.70 band, with the $4.49–$4.60 region acting as a ceiling until evidence of sustained tightness emerges. Only in a more aggressive cold-reversion scenario—multiple weeks of below-normal temperatures, withdrawals persistently above the five-year average, and any sign of production flattening from the current 109.7 bcfd—does a retest of recent highs become plausible, with upside extensions back above $5.00. So far, none of those bullish conditions are firmly in place. Storage remains about 2.8–3.0% above the norm, output is at record levels, and medium-range forecasts favor warmth. That combination argues against paying up now for a weather risk that is not yet visible on the charts.

Trading Stance On NG=F: Bearish Bias With Tactical Hold, Not An Aggressive Buy

Putting all of the data together—20% price erosion from the three-year high to around $4.25, a weekly loss of roughly $0.85, a 177 Bcf draw that still leaves storage at 3,746 Bcf and about 3% above the five-year average, record Lower-48 production at 109.7 bcfd, LNG feedgas near 18.9 bcfd, global benchmarks at $9–$11, and a clearly broken technical structure below $4.495 and $4.390—the current setup for NG=F is short-term bearish with a medium-term equilibrium bias. For directional traders, the risk-reward does not justify a fresh long until either weather or supply conditions change meaningfully. For portfolio positioning, the stance is a tactical hold with a downside skew rather than an outright buy: the market is vulnerable to further tests of $4.05 and potentially sub-$4 levels if mild weather and heavy output persist, while any sustainable move back above $4.70–$4.90 will require a clear shift in either storage trends or production behavior. In other words, NG=F is not priced for disaster, but it is also not offering a compelling entry for bulls yet; the balance of evidence favors patience or cautious, short-biased strategies until the data stop confirming oversupply.

That’s TradingNEWS

Renewed Channel Breakouts

Thursday’s surge fully recovered the top boundaries of two rising trend channels that were briefly lost in the recent pullback. This marks the second successful breakout above both channels since October, distinguishing the current move from the earlier failed attempt and suggesting the market is no longer in an overbought exhaustion state but instead entering a fresh bullish leg across all timeframes.

Confirmation Levels & Targets

A weekly close above $4,264 would seal bullish continuation on that timeframe and deliver the third-highest weekly settlement in history if gold finishes above $4,251 tomorrow. The next major objective is the measured move completion at $4,356, where the current second leg up from October exactly matches the price change of the first advance. The standing record high at $4,381 follows immediately, with a 127.2% projection of the second measured move at $4,454, followed by a 161.8% measured move projection.

Dynamic Support Framework

The entire advance since October has repeatedly respected rising dynamic support. As long as the 20-day average at $4,159 and especially the rising 50-day average at $4,106 remain intact, the multi-timeframe bull trend stays fully on track with room to extend beyond the current record high.

Outlook

Gold has delivered the highest-probability bullish signal in weeks by clearing $4,264, reclaiming both channel tops, and defending the uptrend line for a third day. A daily and weekly close above $4,264 confirms the new leg and targets $4,356 minimum, then $4,381–$4,454; only loss of the 20-day or 50-day averages would raise legitimate caution for the dominant uptrend.

For a look at all of today’s economic events, check out our economic calendar.

Gold (XAU/USD) Surges Above $4,200 as Fed Policy Shift and Macro Pressures Reshape Price Dynamics

Fed’s Third Consecutive Rate Cut Propels Gold Past Key Levels

In the wake of the latest Federal Reserve decision to lower its benchmark rate by 25 basis points, bringing the federal funds rate range to 3.50%–3.75%, Gold (XAU/USD) extended its upside momentum. Spot gold climbed decisively above $4,200, with early Asian session trade showing levels near $4,235 — a meaningful move from the prior floor near the $4,200 psychological zone. This price expansion followed the dovish undertones embedded in the Fed’s communication, even though policymakers stopped short of signaling a clear pace of further easing. Lower interest rates decrease the opportunity cost of holding a non-yielding asset like gold, underpinning bullion’s advance into new territory.

Real Rate Compression and Dollar Weakness Support XAU/USD Drift

The broader macroeconomic backdrop continues to bolster XAU/USD. The U.S. dollar index weakened to multi-week lows following the rate cut, easing downward pressure on gold and further validating bullion’s appeal as an alternative store of value. Real yields have compressed in response to both the rate move and nascent expectations for slower monetary tightening into 2026, enhancing gold’s relative attractiveness for investors seeking protection against currency depreciation and inflation threats.

Gold Consolidates, Testing Support Near $4,190–$4,200 After Initial Rally

Technical price action reflects a subtle shift from relentless rallying to measured consolidation. Despite the yield-friendly policy backdrop, traders observed a pause in upside conviction as XAU/USD hovered near the $4,210–$4,235 corridor. Intraday dips toward the $4,190–$4,200 range found buying support, indicating demand remains intact even amid short-term profit-taking. On shorter timeframes, gold dipped below $4,200 but reclaimed levels around $4,206, signaling that bidders are actively defending this zone, which might be crucial for sustaining a broader uptrend.

Technical Structure Remains Bullish With Key EMAs Anchoring the Trend

Medium-term technical setups underscore gold’s resilience. The 20-day exponential moving average (EMA) near $4,163 is acting as a dynamic support level, above which the uptrend remains structurally intact. The next major support tier, anchored by the 50-day EMA at approximately $4,051, serves as a deeper cushion should short-term consolidation evolve into a deeper pullback. Momentum indicators — including the daily RSI near 61 — reveal moderated but constructive strength, not exhaustion. These signals show that gold’s pullbacks are normal pauses within a larger bullish trajectory rather than shifts in trend direction.

Geopolitical Friction and Safe-Haven Demand Lift Price Floors

Gold’s ascent has not occurred in macro isolation. Heightened geopolitical tensions — including the U.S. seizure of a sanctioned Venezuelan tanker and ongoing uncertainty around Russia-Ukraine peace negotiations — have continually bolstered safe-haven demand. These geopolitical risks amplify the appetite for non-yielding precious metals, helping gold maintain firm footing even when short-term market narratives grapple with mixed data.

Fed Messaging Creates Ambiguity, Testing Traders’ Conviction Above $4,250

While traders initially responded favorably to the 0.25% rate cut, doubts about the timeline for subsequent rate adjustments have clouded near-term sentiment. Fed Chair Jerome Powell’s cautious commentary — emphasizing a wait-and-see approach — left open the possibility of either pausing or adjusting the pace of policy ease in 2026. This ambiguity has given gold markets cause for caution around the $4,250 resistance level. Breaking and holding above this threshold would reinforce the path toward new record highs, while failure could invite deeper reversion toward key supports.

Record Highs and Structural Targets: Eyes on the Next Resistance Levels

Looking at futures quotes on the CME for February gold contracts, the immediate upside targets remain entrenched above former highs. The contract’s near-term resistance resides at the previous overnight high near $4,277.70, followed by the psychological plateau around $4,300. Traders and technical models also point toward the all-time contract high at $4,433 as a marquee target should momentum reignite. On the flip side, downside risk objectives are defined by supports at $4,231.20 and deeper near $4,197.80, which mark key intraday lows from recent sessions.

Emerging Market Price Actions: Indian Gold Rates Reflect Global Forces

Domestic price trends in India — one of the world’s largest gold consumers — reflect international spot pressures and currency and import tax effects. On December 11, 2025, 24K gold in major Indian cities such as Mumbai and Chennai traded near ₹130,630 per 10 grams, up approximately ₹1,080 (0.83%) from the previous close. Similarly, 22K gold hovered around ₹119,744 per 10 grams (0.83% gain), while 18K recorded ₹97,973 per 10 grams (0.83% gain). These increases underline the linkage between international bullion prices and domestic markets, where import costs, currency fluctuations, and local demand dynamics converge to shape retail pricing.

Silver’s Rally Illustrates Broader Precious Metals Strength

The upward trajectory in bullion extends beyond gold. Silver futures — exemplified by March contracts — surged with gains upward of $1.446 to $62.47, hitting fresh record highs amid the same macro support structures that buoy gold. This broad metals performance – driven by real-rate compression, safe-haven flows, and industrial demand – reinforces a growing narrative that both gold and silver are benefitting from dovish monetary policy mixed with persistent geopolitical risks.

Fed’s Treasury Buyback Program Adds Another Layer to Financial Conditions

A notable shift in the post-FOMC landscape was the Fed’s announcement of a $40 billion monthly Treasury bill purchase program, aimed at alleviating pressures in short-term funding markets. While this program hasn’t yet reverberated emphatically through gold prices, the added liquidity factor introduces another dimension to markets already digesting rate cuts and weakening yields. The interplay between quantitative measures and traditional monetary easing continues to shape expectations for real rates, a key driver for gold’s longer-term valuation.

Near-Term Pullbacks Reflect Consolidation, Not Structural Breakdown

Despite recent rallies, markets are eyeing consolidation as gold transitions from rapid rally to price digestion. Pullbacks toward the $4,190–$4,200 range reflect profit taking as traders recalibrate ahead of key macro announcements and potential geopolitical developments. Importantly, such retracements occur within a broader structural uptrend, supported by consistent EMAs and macro drivers.

Trend Outlook Hinges on Rate Expectations and Dollar Movements

The trajectory for XAU/USD now hinges on how markets interpret future Fed direction and the U.S. dollar’s behavior. A continuation of dollar weakness, accompanied by clear expectations of additional rate cuts, would likely fortify gold’s bid and accelerate momentum toward record territory. Conversely, if rate expectations stabilize or the dollar rebounds, gold may experience range-bound trading with support anchoring near critical EMAs.

Assessment: Hold Bias With Tactical Buy Zones on Dips Below $4,150

Based on the interplay of macro data, price structure, and geopolitical inputs, gold’s rally shows structural strength but faces short-term resistance and consolidation. Key support levels near $4,190–$4,200 and medium-term EMAs offer potential entry points for disciplined buyers. A clean break above $4,250 would reinforce further upside, while failures to hold recent ranges may invite deeper tests. Given the persistence of safe-haven demand, real-rate support, and technical structure, a Hold bias with selective accumulation on dips — particularly under $4,150 — aligns with current market behavior.

That’s TradingNEWS

At 15:15 GMT, January Natural Gas Futures are trading $4.326, down $0.269 or -5.85%.

Is a Larger-Than-Average Storage Draw Enough to Offset Mild Forecasts?

Thursday’s EIA report is expected to show a sharply above-average storage withdrawal, reflecting last week’s colder-than-normal temperatures across the Midwest and Northeast. Forecast ranges are wide, from -167 Bcf to -174 Bcf, versus the five-year average draw of -89 Bcf.

While a draw of this magnitude would normally offer support, sentiment remains bearish due to the forecasted warmup. A strong print may provide only limited relief if traders believe next week’s milder pattern will suppress demand.

Weather Models Shift Bearish for Second Half of December

According to NatGasWeather, national demand will remain high through the weekend as frigid systems move through the Midwest and East. Highs in the 10s–30s and lows below freezing are expected to dominate through Sunday. However, next week’s forecast flips dramatically, with above-normal temperatures expected to spread across most of the Lower 48, sharply reducing heating demand into Christmas.

This warm bias has taken center stage for traders, undermining the impact of near-term cold and limiting upside momentum.

Technical Selling Accelerates as Key Levels Fail

The break below $4.495, previously serving as the 50-day moving average, triggered heavy liquidation as algorithmic and technical traders exited long positions. A cascade of selling followed as the $4.390 level failed, leaving the October 29 low at $4.052 as the next downside marker. Without supportive weather or sustained demand, the market appears vulnerable to further retracement.