The main tag of GoldPrice Articles.
You can use the search box below to find what you need.
[wd_asp id=1]
The main tag of GoldPrice Articles.
You can use the search box below to find what you need.
[wd_asp id=1]
Gold (XAU/USD) extends the previous day’s late pullback from the vicinity of the record high and attracts some follow-through selling during the Asian session on Friday. The US Consumer Price Index (CPI) report released on Thursday pointed to cooling of inflationary pressure. This turns out to be a key factor undermining demand for the previous metal, which is seen as a hedge against rising prices. Furthermore, renewed US Dollar (USD) buying interest and a positive risk tone exert additional downward pressure on the commodity.
A delayed report published by the US Bureau of Labor Statistics on Thursday showed that the headline CPI rose by the 2.7% YoY rate in November against 3.1% expected. Moreover, the core CPI, which excludes volatile food and energy prices, also missed consensus estimates and climbed 2.6% last month. Economists, however, warned that the figures were likely distorted on the back of the longest-ever US government shutdown. This, in turn, assists the USD in attracting for the third straight day and climbs back closer to the weekly top, touched on Wednesday. A firmer Greenback tends to dent demand for USD-denominated commodities, including Gold.
Nevertheless, the crucial inflation data did little to temper expectations of further policy easing by the US Federal Reserve (Fed). Traders are still pricing in a 63 basis points (bps) of rate cuts in 2026. Adding to this, US President Donald Trump said the next Fed chair will be someone who backs sharply lower interest rates. This, in turn, could offer support to the non-yielding Gold. Meanwhile, the prospects for lower US interest rates revive investors’ appetite for riskier assets. This is evident from a generally positive tone around the equity markets and offsets the supporting factor, backing the case for a further near-term depreciating move for the XAU/USD pair.
Traders now look to the US economic docket – featuring Existing Home Sales and the revised University of Michigan Consumer Sentiment Index. This, along with comments from influential FOMC members, might provide some impetus to the USD and produce short-term opportunities around the Gold. Meanwhile, the XAU/USD pair still seems poised to register modest gains for the second straight week. The fundamental backdrop, however, suggests that the path of least resistance for the bullion is to the downside and warrants caution for bullish traders, though a break and acceptance below the $4.300 mark is needed to reaffirm the negative outlook.
The overnight fake breakout through the $4,350-$4,355 supply zone and a subsequent fall below the 100-hour Simple Moving Average (SMA) on Friday favor the XAU/USD bears. However, mixed oscillators on hourly and daily charts make it prudent to wait for some follow-through selling below the $4,300 mark before positioning for deeper losses. The bullion might then fall to the $4,272-4,271 region, or the weekly low. This is followed by the $4,260-4,255 horizontal resistance breakpoint-turned-support, which, if broken, would suggest that the Gold price has topped out and expose the $4,200 round figure.
On the flip side, the $4,338-4,340 zone now seems to act as an immediate hurdle, above which the XAU/USD pair could make a fresh attempt towards challenging the all-time peak, around the $4,380 region, touched in October. Some follow-through buying, leading to a move beyond the $4,400 mark, will be seen as a fresh trigger for bullish traders and allow the Gold price to prolong its recent well-established trend from sub-$3,900 levels, or the October swing low.
Oil is weak, not collapsing. On 18 December 2025, WTI (CL=F) trades around $56–$57 and Brent (BZ=F) is near $60 per barrel. Intraday, Brent is up roughly 0.5–0.7% around $59.9–$60.1, while WTI adds about 0.7–1.0% near $56.3–$56.5, a modest bounce after WTI closed near $55.27 earlier in the week, its lowest settle since February 2021. Even after this uptick, 2025 remains a drawdown year: WTI is down roughly 21% year-to-date, and Brent is lower by just under 20%, consistent with a market that has been pricing oversupply and soft demand rather than a persistent shortage.
Today’s modest rise is driven by a geopolitical risk premium, not by a structural tightening in balances. The United States has ordered a “total and complete blockade” of sanctioned tankers moving Venezuelan crude in and out of the country. Estimates suggest around 600,000 barrels per day of Venezuelan exports are potentially at risk, with flows to the U.S. of roughly 160,000 bpd still partially protected by authorizations linked to Chevron (NYSE:CVX) cargoes. Venezuelan flows represent roughly 1% of global supply, but sanctioned tonnage and insurance risk inject volatility into freight and risk pricing. At the same time, Venezuela’s PDVSA is recovering from a cyberattack that temporarily froze loadings. While operations have resumed, many export shipments remain delayed, adding another layer of uncertainty to short-term export volumes. Parallel to Venezuela, traders are watching the prospect of tighter U.S. sanctions on Russia’s energy sector if peace talks over Ukraine stall, plus new European measures targeting dozens of vessels in Russia’s “shadow fleet” designed to constrain sanctioned crude transport. In theory, these steps should be clearly bullish. In practice, the price impact is capped because the market’s dominant narrative is still “too much oil”, not “too little.”
Recent U.S. inventory data highlight the imbalance. Crude stocks fell by roughly 1.3 million barrels to about 424.4 million barrels in the week ending 12 December, but gasoline and distillate inventories rose more than expected. The crude draw is driven mainly by stronger exports and higher refinery runs, not by a surge in end-demand. Refinery utilization has climbed to the highest levels since early September, yet refined product stocks are building. That tells you the system is well supplied: refineries are processing heavily, but downstream demand is not tight enough to absorb output cleanly. Globally, official outlooks for 2025–2026 show demand growth around 830,000 bpd in 2025 and 860,000 bpd in 2026, while observed inventories rise and crude held “on water” increases sharply as cargoes take longer routes or sit waiting for buyers. Analyst scenarios for 2026 point to potential surpluses ranging roughly from 0.5 million bpd to over 4 million bpd, depending on how OPEC+, U.S. shale and new producers like Brazil, Guyana and Argentina behave. That is why every geopolitical shock is being faded: the default assumption is structural surplus, so disruptions must be large and prolonged to reprice the complex in a lasting way.
Forward price projections for Brent (BZ=F) in 2026 cluster around the low-to-mid $50–$60 range, with WTI (CL=F) a few dollars lower. One major official U.S. forecast sees Brent averaging around $55 in Q1 2026 and staying close to that through the year. A large investment bank projects Brent around $56 and WTI near $52 in 2026, again reflecting depressed but not catastrophic pricing. A survey of analysts published recently shows Brent averaging about $62.2 and WTI around $59.0 in 2026. Different methodologies, similar conclusion: nobody is modeling a structurally tight oil market next year. Where they differ is timing of the turn. Several houses argue that by 2027 prices will need to move higher to incentivize new upstream investment as reserve life shrinks and U.S. shale matures, but the consensus is that 2026 itself is a low-pricing, surplus year, not a major bull market.
Today’s bearish behavior adds to the likelihood that the next lower key support zone may be reached before the current retracement completes. The 61.8% Fibonacci retracement at $3.89 defined this week’s support zone. The reaction of price resistance represented by the 50-day line and a top channel line has shown the sellers remaining in charge. The two indicators show a similar price area for resistance and today’s bearish reaction confirms it. Once prior key support is shown as resistance, the downtrend may be ready to proceed. However, a drop below and daily close below this week’s low of $3.84 is still needed for a bearish continuation signal.
If natural gas fails to take out today’s high before a new trend low, then the next lower target looks likely to be reached. The 200-day average at $3.58 anchors the next lower price zone, along with a long-term uptrend line and a horizontal level around $3.59. That price area was shown as both clear support and resistance in the past. Most recently with the October high at $3.59.
More significantly, the 2023 peak was at $3.64. If that zone fails to reverse price, then the 78.6% Fibonacci retracement at $3.45 becomes a target. There is also confirmation for the 200-day price zone in the weekly chart as the 50-week and 20-week averages are at $3.63 and $3.61, respectively.
On the upside, a decisive breakout above today’s high would be needed for a bullish reversal. That would put natural gas in a position to challenge resistance near the 20-day average, now at $4.55 and falling.
Natural gas’s bounce has stalled exactly at flipped support with a bearish engulfing pattern, reinforcing seller dominance and raising odds of a confirmed break below $3.84. Hold above today’s high to keep countertrend hopes alive; failure opens acceleration toward the powerful 200-day confluence at $3.58–$3.64 and potentially $3.45 if that breaks.
Gold prices are consolidating near record territory on Thursday, December 18, 2025, as traders juggle two powerful forces pulling in opposite directions: a still-resilient U.S. dollar and the renewed case for lower U.S. interest rates after a cooler-than-expected inflation reading.
In early trading, spot gold was around the $4,330-per-ounce area, modestly lower on the day after a strong prior-session move, while U.S. gold futures were also fractionally softer. [1]
But the bigger story for bullion today is macro: U.S. CPI cooled to 2.7% year-on-year in November, under the 3.1% consensus forecast in a Reuters poll—fuel for the “rates can fall further” narrative that has helped propel gold’s historic 2025 rally. [2]
Gold’s headline price action on Dec. 18 is best described as steady-to-soft, not a collapse—more like a market taking a breath near all-time highs after an extraordinary year.
A later read from Reuters showed spot gold down 0.4% to $4,323.57/oz (as of 12:10 GMT) with U.S. futures down 0.4% to $4,356.10, underscoring the day’s “small dip” tone rather than any trend break. [5]
Investing.com, meanwhile, cited spot gold at $4,336.54/oz at 09:15 ET (14:15 GMT), with February gold futures at $4,370.30/oz—again consistent with a narrow, high-level range. [6]
One of the simplest relationships in commodities is also one of the most reliable: a stronger dollar can pressure gold, because it makes dollar-priced bullion more expensive for overseas buyers.
Reuters noted the dollar index edged up after touching a near one-week high the prior session, a factor weighing on gold as traders positioned cautiously ahead of inflation data. [7]
But CPI shifted the balance.
After the data, Reuters reported the dollar index weakened (down 0.12% to 98.25 in that update) and Treasury yields fell, an environment that typically improves gold’s appeal. [8]
The headline macro catalyst today is the CPI undershoot:
There’s an important nuance: Reuters reported the CPI release was affected by a 43-day government shutdown, and the Bureau of Labor Statistics did not publish month-to-month CPI changes because October data collection was disrupted. That “data quality caveat” is a big reason why markets may be hesitant to chase gold aggressively higher on a single print. [10]
Even so, softer inflation tends to push investors toward the view that real yields can fall, which is a structural positive for non-yielding assets like gold. [11]
Gold’s 2025 surge has been tightly linked to the belief that the U.S. is in, or nearing, a lower-rate regime. Today’s flow of Fed-related headlines reinforced that debate.
Reuters highlighted that:
For bullion investors, this mix matters because gold can react to two things at once:
Reuters’ broader gold-forecast reporting this week explicitly included worries about Fed independence among the factors analysts see supporting bullion into 2026. [15]
Dec. 18 isn’t only about the Fed. It’s also a heavyweight central-bank week globally, and those decisions feed into FX and bond-market moves that spill over into gold.
Investing.com reported:
That mix matters for gold in two ways:
Gold isn’t moving in isolation. On Dec. 18, Reuters and Investing.com both highlighted unusual strength across precious metals:
Why this matters for gold: when the whole complex runs together, positioning risk rises—profit-taking in one metal can spill into others, even if gold’s fundamentals remain bullish.
One of today’s most striking region-specific stories comes from Thailand, where policymakers are explicitly linking gold trading to currency-market stress.
Reuters reported the Thai central bank is urging the finance ministry to regulate gold trading after a surge in transactions helped push the baht higher, with the governor saying that on days of sharp baht strength, gold transactions can account for about half of the flows driving the move. [20]
For global gold readers, the takeaway is bigger than Thailand: it’s a real-time example of how active gold trading and cross-border flows can become macro-relevant, affecting currencies, policy debates, and potentially even local market access and liquidity.
Australia’s government-linked commodity outlook also underscored how gold’s high price level is reshaping the real economy.
Reuters reported Australia revised expected resource export earnings up 4% to A$383 billion for the current financial year, pointing to record gold prices as a key contributor. It also said gold is set to become Australia’s second most valuable resource export (after iron ore) in the 2025–26 financial year. [21]
Notably, that report included a forward-looking anchor: it said gold prices are likely to remain strong at around $4,000/oz over 2026 before falling in 2027 (in that outlook). [22]
That matters for the “forecast” question investors keep asking: even more cautious government-linked assumptions are now using $4,000 gold as a baseline for next year—a remarkable reset compared with the pre-2024 era.
A day before today’s CPI-driven headlines, Reuters published one of the most comprehensive roundups of the market’s 2026 gold forecasts—and the range is wide.
Key points from that Reuters analysis:
The same Reuters report laid out why strategists believe this cycle has different “supports” than older gold booms:
Even in a bullish framework, the risks are real:
Thursday’s price action fits a common late-cycle pattern in strong bull markets:
Investing.com explicitly described profit-taking after a sharp rally over the past week, while still pointing to “structural support” from central-bank buying and de-dollarisation themes. [33]
And Reuters captured the same cautious tone ahead of CPI, quoting UBS strategist Giovanni Staunovo on investors preferring not to head into the inflation report with open risk. [34]
Gold’s next decisive move is likely to come from a combination of policy confirmation and liquidity:
As of today’s 09:55 update on December 18, 2025, gold remains firmly parked near the $4,330/oz region, reflecting a market that is digesting softer U.S. inflation while still respecting short-term dollar strength and profit-taking near records. [39]
The most important shift in today’s news flow is not the day’s small price dip. It’s the macro narrative reset: with CPI at 2.7% YoY versus 3.1% expected, the case for further easing in 2026 looks stronger—exactly the environment where gold has historically done well. [40]
And with major banks now openly discussing $4,500 to $5,000 gold scenarios in 2026—alongside more conservative forecasts that still sit above $4,200—the metal enters year-end not as a fringe hedge, but as a core macro asset class that’s forcing governments, central banks, and investors to adapt. [41]
XAUUSD Gold Technical Analysis Levels Revealed
1. www.reuters.com, 2. www.reuters.com, 3. www.reuters.com, 4. www.reuters.com, 5. www.reuters.com, 6. ng.investing.com, 7. www.reuters.com, 8. www.reuters.com, 9. www.reuters.com, 10. www.reuters.com, 11. www.reuters.com, 12. www.reuters.com, 13. www.reuters.com, 14. www.reuters.com, 15. www.reuters.com, 16. ng.investing.com, 17. www.reuters.com, 18. www.reuters.com, 19. www.reuters.com, 20. www.reuters.com, 21. www.reuters.com, 22. www.reuters.com, 23. www.reuters.com, 24. www.reuters.com, 25. www.reuters.com, 26. www.reuters.com, 27. www.reuters.com, 28. www.reuters.com, 29. www.reuters.com, 30. www.reuters.com, 31. www.reuters.com, 32. www.reuters.com, 33. ng.investing.com, 34. www.reuters.com, 35. www.reuters.com, 36. www.reuters.com, 37. ng.investing.com, 38. www.reuters.com, 39. www.reuters.com, 40. www.reuters.com, 41. www.reuters.com
XRP’s USD price (XRP-USD) is trading around $1.90–$1.91 on Thursday, December 18, 2025, after another volatile session that briefly pushed the token down toward the mid‑$1.80s and up toward the high‑$1.90s. Across major market trackers, XRP’s 24-hour range has been roughly $1.83 to $1.98—a swing of nearly 8% from low to high, underscoring how jumpy risk assets remain into year‑end. [1]
That volatility is showing up in the broader tape too: bitcoin is still struggling to regain consistent upside traction, while altcoins like XRP are reacting to macro data, ETF flows, and shifting risk appetite almost tick-for-tick. [2]
Below is what’s driving XRP price today, what the latest news and analysis is highlighting on Dec. 18, 2025, and the forecast scenarios traders and investors are watching next.
As of Dec. 18, XRP is quoted near $1.90–$1.91, with notable intraday markers around:
The headline level traders keep circling is psychological as much as technical: $2.00. Multiple market reads published today frame the area just below $2 as an “inflection” zone—where rebounds keep failing and where sellers appear to defend exits. [4]
A major macro catalyst on Dec. 18 has been the latest U.S. inflation read. Reports covering Thursday’s data pointed to cooler-than-expected CPI, which can loosen financial conditions by pulling forward expectations for future rate cuts. In crypto, that often translates into short bursts of relief—especially when positioning is already leaning bearish. [5]
That said, the same coverage also noted uncertainty around the data due to recent disruptions, which helps explain why “good news” hasn’t automatically produced a clean, sustained risk-on rally. [6]
Even with pockets of optimism, several analyses argue crypto is trading like a high-beta extension of broader risk markets right now—meaning when investors de-risk (or even hesitate), altcoins tend to feel it first. One market note published this week described XRP as stuck between nearby support and overhead resistance while the wider market remains choppy. [7]
One forecast published today emphasized that retail demand has faded, pointing to declining futures open interest as evidence that speculative positioning has cooled compared with earlier in the year. The implication: XRP can still bounce, but sustained rallies may struggle without broader participation returning. [8]
One of the most important structural stories for XRP in late 2025 is the emergence of U.S.-listed spot XRP ETFs—and the market is now watching whether those flows can eventually overpower short-term risk-off behavior.
Multiple reports published around Dec. 18 cite steady inflows into U.S.-listed XRP spot ETFs:
A separate analysis this week argued that spot XRP ETFs had built ~$1.01B in net inflows in their early weeks, but still represent a relatively small slice of XRP’s overall market cap—suggesting more “room” for institutional allocation if the category keeps maturing. [10]
One of the clearest, primary-source confirmations comes from Bitwise, which announced its Bitwise XRP ETF would start trading on NYSE on Nov. 20, 2025 under ticker XRP, holding spot XRP and charging a stated management fee (with an initial waiver structure described in the release). [11]
Separately, reports around the broader ETF rollout noted earlier launches and additional listings, including an initial U.S. spot XRP ETF approval and trading start in mid‑November. [12]
Why this matters for price forecasts: ETF flows can be supportive over time, but they don’t guarantee a straight-line move. In the short run, macro risk, profit-taking, and technical breaks can outweigh steady inflows—especially if the market is leaning defensive into year-end.
XRP’s market narrative is tightly linked to Ripple (the company), even though XRP trades freely on exchanges and is not “a Ripple stock.” On Dec. 18, two notable Ripple-related headlines added to the institutional backdrop:
Ripple announced an expanded partnership with TJM Investments / TJM Institutional Services, describing infrastructure support for execution and clearing services and stating Ripple has invested in TJM. The release frames this as part of Ripple Prime’s institutional push (including expectations of expanded digital-asset coverage). [13]
Decrypt reported that VivoPower plans to originate up to $300 million in Ripple Labs shares for an investment vehicle, pitching that equity exposure as implying indirect exposure to roughly 450 million XRP at current prices (valued around $900 million in the article’s framing). [14]
These kinds of stories don’t automatically move XRP day-to-day—but they contribute to the broader theme that more vehicles are being built to express XRP-related exposure through regulated or traditional wrappers.
One of the most consequential regulatory developments in December is that the U.S. Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) granted conditional approval for Ripple (and other crypto firms) to establish a national trust bank. Importantly, Reuters notes these charters still require final approval before the trust banks can operate, and they do not allow deposit-taking or lending like a full commercial bank. [15]
For XRP market participants, the key signal isn’t “banking magic,” it’s the direction of travel: deeper integration of crypto infrastructure into the regulated financial system—paired with ongoing political and industry debate about standards and risk. [16]
Across today’s forecast notes and analyses, the market is converging around a few key zones.
Different analyses cite different downside waypoints, but the recurring idea is simple: a clean break below $1.82 increases the odds of a deeper flush.
On the upside, the “prove it” level remains $2.00. Analysts broadly frame a reclaim-and-hold above $2 as the first step toward stabilizing.
Above that, one analysis highlights a heavier resistance zone around $2.20–$2.30, describing XRP as having spent weeks trapped beneath it. [20]
Because crypto markets can pivot hard on macro headlines (and XRP can overshoot in either direction), the most responsible forecast is scenario-based. Here’s what today’s reports imply.
If broader risk appetite remains fragile into late December, XRP may continue chopping between roughly $1.82 and $2.00, with rallies selling off near resistance and buyers defending the lower band. This aligns with commentary emphasizing weakened retail participation and the market’s difficulty turning ETF inflows into immediate upside. [21]
If XRP loses ~$1.82 decisively—especially on rising volatility—several analyses suggest the market could probe lower into the $1.60s. In this path, ETF inflows may slow the decline but not necessarily stop it if macro conditions worsen or bitcoin sells off further. [22]
A bullish reversal likely requires a combination of:
This is the “prove the bottom” scenario: if it happens, today’s analysis suggests XRP could transition from “damage control” into a more constructive recovery phase. [23]
Looking beyond the next candle, XRP traders are likely to keep focusing on:
On Dec. 18, 2025, XRP price today (XRP-USD) is hovering near $1.90, still struggling to reclaim $2.00 even as the institutional “plumbing” around XRP appears to be expanding—via spot XRP ETFs with roughly ~$1B+ in cumulative net inflows and a drumbeat of Ripple institutional announcements. [28]
The near-term forecast comes down to a simple battle: hold $1.82–$1.90 support or risk a deeper slide, versus reclaim $2.00 and build a base strong enough to challenge the next resistance band. [29]
XRP Price Predictions: Could It Reach $1000?
1. www.coingecko.com, 2. www.tmgm.com, 3. www.coingecko.com, 4. www.fxstreet.com, 5. www.investors.com, 6. www.investors.com, 7. www.investing.com, 8. www.fxstreet.com, 9. www.fxstreet.com, 10. www.investing.com, 11. bitwiseinvestments.com, 12. finance.yahoo.com, 13. www.businesswire.com, 14. decrypt.co, 15. www.reuters.com, 16. www.reuters.com, 17. www.fxstreet.com, 18. www.investing.com, 19. www.tmgm.com, 20. www.investing.com, 21. www.fxstreet.com, 22. www.investing.com, 23. www.investors.com, 24. www.fxstreet.com, 25. www.investors.com, 26. www.reuters.com, 27. www.businesswire.com, 28. www.coingecko.com, 29. www.fxstreet.com
Oil prices are inching higher today, but the rally is tentative — more a geopolitical “risk premium” flicker than a full-blown trend reversal. In early Thursday trading on December 18, 2025, Brent crude hovered around $60 a barrel while U.S. West Texas Intermediate (WTI) traded in the mid-$56s, as markets weighed fresh supply-disruption risks tied to Venezuela and Russia against a stubbornly bearish backdrop of swelling inventories and forecasts for a well-supplied 2026. [1]
By mid-morning in Europe, Brent was up about half a percent near $60 per barrel and WTI was up roughly two-thirds of a percent around $56.32, according to Reuters pricing at 09:10 GMT. [2]
Other early snapshots told the same story: modest gains, volatile intraday action, and plenty of skepticism that the bounce can last without a meaningful change in supply-demand fundamentals. [3]
The biggest headline driver is Washington’s escalating pressure campaign on Venezuela’s oil exports. Reuters reports that President Donald Trump ordered a “total and complete blockade” of sanctioned oil tankers entering and leaving Venezuela, a move that immediately raised questions about enforcement, legality, and the real-world impact on barrels reaching the market. [4]
Why traders care: even if Venezuela is not a massive swing supplier, disruptions can matter when the market is already anxious about sanctions compliance and shipping constraints.
Key details shaping the price reaction:
Even so, the market’s response has been restrained — largely because traders are still asking the same two questions: How enforceable is it, and how long does it last? [8]
Alongside Venezuela, traders are weighing the possibility of tighter restrictions on Russia’s energy sector. Reuters reports that Bloomberg cited sources saying the U.S. is preparing another round of Russia-related energy sanctions if Moscow does not agree to a Ukraine peace deal — although Reuters also notes a White House official said Trump had not made decisions on Russian sanctions. [9]
ING’s take is blunt: with Brent trading around $60 and a broader surplus outlook, Washington potentially has more room to turn the sanctions “dial” upward than it would in a tight market. [10]
Venezuela’s state oil company PDVSA has also been dealing with operational turbulence. Reuters reported that PDVSA resumed loading after disruptions tied to a cyberattack, but that many Venezuelan exports were still on hold even as loading restarted — another factor encouraging short-term supply caution. [11]
Today’s lift comes after crude flirted with multi-year lows earlier this week. Reuters reported that WTI settled at $55.27 on Tuesday, the lowest close since February 2021, before rebounding as Venezuela headlines hit. [12]
The reason the rally is capped is simple: the macro narrative remains dominated by oversupply expectations and uneven demand growth.
Investing.com notes that despite Thursday’s gains, oil has still been tracking toward weekly losses and that 2025 has been a bruising year: WTI down about 21% year-to-date and Brent down just under 20%, reflecting how persistent surplus fears have been. [13]
A key “reality check” for oil bulls this week has been U.S. stockpile data.
Reuters reported that U.S. crude inventories fell by about 1.3 million barrels to 424.4 million barrels in the week ending December 12, but gasoline and distillate inventories rose more than expected — a combination that can mute crude rallies because it hints at softer end-demand or seasonal refinery dynamics. [14]
ING’s daily commodities note adds color: it pegs the crude draw at about 1.27 million barrels, driven largely by stronger exports (with crude exports rising sharply week-over-week), while refined product inventories built meaningfully and refinery runs climbed to the highest levels since early September. [15]
Translation for traders: crude supply is not the only story. If refined products are building, it can be harder for crude prices to sustain a breakout — even when geopolitical headlines are loud.
If today’s price action feels like a tug-of-war, the forecasts explain why.
In its Short-Term Energy Outlook released in December, the U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) expects global inventories to keep rising through 2026 and forecasts Brent averaging about $55 per barrel in Q1 2026, staying near that level through the rest of next year. [16]
Notably, the EIA also flags two forces that could prevent an outright collapse: OPEC+ production policy and China’s continued inventory builds. [17]
The International Energy Agency’s December 2025 Oil Market Report sketches a market where supply growth still outpaces demand growth.
Among the most market-moving signals in the IEA update:
The big message: even if sanctions tighten around the edges, the market is still wrestling with abundance.
A Reuters poll of analysts and economists published in late November projected Brent averaging $62.23 per barrel in 2026 and WTI averaging $59.00, while estimating the potential 2026 surplus across a wide range (from roughly 0.5 to 4.2 million bpd). [21]
Crucially, the same poll emphasized the idea that geopolitics may keep a “floor” under prices — not because balances are tight, but because disruptions and enforcement risks can reprice quickly. [22]
Here’s the tension in today’s market:
Reuters quoted a former U.S. State Department energy diplomat suggesting that if Venezuelan exports are materially curtailed and not replaced by spare capacity, the impact could be several dollars per barrel (on the order of $5 to $8). [23]
At the same time, Reuters also cited analysts who argue that U.S. actions may add short-term noise without materially tightening global balances unless the disruption persists or widens. [24]
For readers tracking oil price today and where crude goes next, the near-term roadmap is clear:
Oil is higher today — but it’s rising in a market that still believes the bigger story is too much supply chasing modest demand growth. Venezuela and Russia are injecting fresh uncertainty, and that uncertainty can move prices quickly. Yet the latest official outlooks still point toward a 2026 landscape where inventories build and rallies face resistance unless disruptions become concrete and prolonged. [29]
1. www.reuters.com, 2. www.reuters.com, 3. www.investing.com, 4. www.reuters.com, 5. www.reuters.com, 6. www.reuters.com, 7. www.washingtonpost.com, 8. think.ing.com, 9. www.reuters.com, 10. think.ing.com, 11. www.reuters.com, 12. www.reuters.com, 13. www.investing.com, 14. www.reuters.com, 15. think.ing.com, 16. www.eia.gov, 17. www.eia.gov, 18. www.iea.org, 19. www.iea.org, 20. www.iea.org, 21. www.reuters.com, 22. www.reuters.com, 23. www.reuters.com, 24. www.reuters.com, 25. www.reuters.com, 26. www.reuters.com, 27. www.reuters.com, 28. www.eia.gov, 29. www.reuters.com
Important DisclaimersFXEmpire is owned and operated by Empire Media Network LTD., Company Registration Number 514641786, registered at 7 Jabotinsky Road, Ramat Gan 5252007, Israel. The content provided on this website includes general news and publications, our personal analysis and opinions, and materials provided by third parties. This content is intended for educational and research purposes only. It does not constitute, and should not be interpreted as, a recommendation or advice to take any action, including making any investment or purchasing any product. Before making any financial decision, you should conduct your own due diligence, exercise your own discretion, and consult with competent advisors. The content on this website is not personally directed to you, and we do not take into account your individual financial situation or needs. The information contained on this website is not necessarily provided in real time, nor is it guaranteed to be accurate. Prices displayed may be provided by market makers and not by exchanges. Any trading or other financial decision you make is entirely your own responsibility, and you must not rely solely on any information provided through the website. FXEmpire does not provide any warranty regarding the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of any information contained on the website and shall bear no responsibility for any trading losses you may incur as a result of using such information. The website may include advertisements and other promotional content. FXEmpire may receive compensation from third parties in connection with such content. FXEmpire does not endorse, recommend, or assume responsibility for the use of any third-party services or websites. Empire Media Network LTD., its employees, officers, subsidiaries, and affiliates shall not be liable for any loss or damage resulting from your use of the website or reliance on the information provided herein.Risk DisclaimersThis website contains information about cryptocurrencies, contracts for difference (CFDs), and other financial instruments, as well as about brokers, exchanges, and other entities trading in such instruments. Both cryptocurrencies and CFDs are complex instruments and involve a high risk of losing money. You should carefully consider whether you understand how these instruments work and whether you can afford to take the high risk of losing your money. FX Empire encourages you to conduct your own research before making any investment decision and to avoid investing in any financial instrument unless you fully understand how it works and the risks involved.
Natural gas price attempted to resist the negative pressures by ending the negative trading after testing the bullish channel’s support to $3.880, forming a positive rebound by its stability near $4.080.
We couldn’t confirm regaining the bullish attempts unless breaching the barrier at $4.200 and providing positive close above it, therefore, we expect providing mixed trading and there is a chance for providing new pressures on the main support, while breaching the barrier and holding above will provide strong chance to begin achieving several gains, to expect its rally initially towards $4.510.
The expected trading range for today is between $3.900 and $4.200
Trend forecast: Bearish
Hindustan Copper Ltd (NSE: HINDCOPPER, BSE: 513599) surged in Thursday’s trade (December 18, 2025), climbing about 5% and hovering just shy of its 52-week high zone. By early afternoon, the stock was trading around ₹387–₹388, while the broader metal pack also stayed positive. [1]
What made the move stand out wasn’t only the price: it was the activity. Hindustan Copper featured among the day’s most actively traded names by value, with turnover around ₹401.8 crore and volume above 1.06 crore shares in the session’s early hours—classic “crowd just showed up” behaviour. [2]
Below is a detailed news-and-analysis wrap of what’s happening as of 18.12.2025, plus the major forecasts (commodity and company-related), broker views, and the key risks market participants are watching.
Intraday data points were loud and clear: buyers were willing to chase the stock closer to its 52-week ceiling.
At the sector level, the BSE Metal index was also higher (around +0.7% at the time of reporting), which matters because metals rallies often move in packs—macro tailwinds first, stock-specific momentum second. [7]
One caution flag inside the excitement: MarketsMojo noted that delivery volume (a proxy for “I’m holding this overnight”) on Dec 17 was lower than the 5-day average, even as intraday turnover spiked—suggesting a meaningful chunk of the day’s action could be short-term trading rather than long-term accumulation. [8]
Hindustan Copper is, at heart, a copper-linked business—so the global copper tape matters even when there’s no company-specific announcement on the day.
Reuters reported copper moving toward $12,000/ton, driven by tightening supply and demand growth linked to AI data centers and power infrastructure, with analysts projecting deficits continuing into 2026. [9]
But forecasts are not unanimous in tone:
Translation: copper’s structural story (electrification + AI + grid buildout) remains compelling, but the “straight line up” narrative is contested—even among big-name research desks.
A key reason Hindustan Copper continues to get “re-rated” attention in 2025 is the capacity-expansion storyline.
Moneycontrol previously highlighted the company’s plan to increase mining capacity to 12.2 MT by FY31 (from 3.47 MT in FY25) and outlined ~₹2,000 crore in capex over 5–6 years. [12]
Separately, credit rating agency ICRA reiterated an expectation of healthy FY2026 performance and referenced ongoing capex plans (₹2,000 crore) aimed at scaling mine capacity, while also flagging the dependence on copper prices. [13]
When a commodity producer pairs a favourable tape with a credible multi-year volume ramp, markets tend to do what markets do: price the optionality early and argue about execution later.
One of the most concrete recent corporate developments is the 02.12.2025 MoU with NTPC Mining Ltd.
In its exchange intimation, Hindustan Copper said it executed an MoU to jointly participate in copper and critical minerals block auctions, develop/operationalize blocks, and explore collaboration across domestic and overseas copper/critical mineral projects. [14]
For investors, this matters less as an immediate earnings trigger and more as a signal: the company is positioning itself as a broader “critical minerals” participant, not only a legacy copper miner.
Hindustan Copper’s Chile angle has been building through 2025.
A Government of India Press Information Bureau release (June 2025) noted that a CODELCO delegation visited India, following an MoU focused on knowledge sharing in exploration, mining, beneficiation, and capacity building. [15]
On the deal-speculation/strategic front, NDTV Profit reported in October 2025 that Hindustan Copper was assessing acquisition of two Chile copper mines via a JV with CODELCO, citing sources and noting an HCL team would visit Chile for assessment. [16]
And Business Today also reported (Nov 2025) that India’s mines secretary said HCL was in discussions with CODELCO, describing the possibility of a JV framework. [17]
For the stock, offshore optionality tends to function like narrative leverage: it can amplify optimism during upcycles, but it also raises the bar for execution discipline and capital allocation.
Even “other-company” news can be a breadcrumb for HCL capex activity.
On Dec 11, 2025, The Economic Times (PTI) reported SEPC settled a dispute with Hindustan Copper (₹30.45 crore settlement) and received a supplementary work order worth ₹72.5 crore tied to an ongoing vertical shaft sinking project. [18]
This doesn’t automatically mean a meaningful earnings impact for HCL, but it does reinforce that mine-related project execution is actively progressing in the ecosystem around it.
Hindustan Copper’s most recent quarterly print helped keep sentiment buoyant going into year-end.
The Economic Times (PTI) reported that for Q2 FY26 (Sep quarter), the company posted consolidated net profit of ₹186.02 crore (up ~85% YoY), with income rising to ₹728.95 crore. [19]
The same report also noted that some smelting/refining operations at Jhagadia and Ghatsila have been suspended since 2019 due to business considerations—important context when modelling how the company participates across the copper value chain. [20]
According to Trendlyne’s aggregation of broker research, Hindustan Copper has an average share price target of ₹450, implying about 16% upside from ~₹386.85, based on 1 analyst / 1 report. [21]
A single-analyst consensus is not a “consensus” in the way Nifty50 mega-caps have one—so treat it as a reference point, not a crowd-sourced truth.
Investing.com’s daily technical read (timestamped Dec 18, 2025) showed a “Strong Buy” summary across both technical indicators and moving averages. At the same time, some oscillators flashed overbought conditions (for example, RSI(14) ~71 and StochRSI showing overbought). [22]
This combination—strong trend + overbought signals—often translates into two plausible near-term paths:
ICRA’s Oct 2025 report said the rating reaffirmation factors in an expectation of healthy financial performance in FY2026, supported by firm copper prices and improving operating performance, while also acknowledging exposure to copper-price fluctuations and execution factors. [23]
With the stock trading within striking distance of its 52-week high band, the chart conversation gets simple (and intense):
Also notable: the stock’s run-up is happening with significant intraday participation, which can exaggerate both breakouts and shakeouts. [26]
A rally this strong naturally raises the uncomfortable dinner-table question: “Is it getting expensive?”
Equitymaster pegged Hindustan Copper’s trailing P/E around 65.5 at the time of its Dec 18 market update. [27]
High multiples don’t automatically mean “overvalued” in a commodity-linked name—sometimes they reflect peak-cycle earnings skepticism, sometimes growth optionality, sometimes pure momentum. But they do mean expectations are elevated, and disappointment gets punished faster.
A non-exhaustive reality check (because markets love humility):
As of Dec 18, Hindustan Copper is behaving like a stock the market wants to own right now: strong sector tape, strong intraday demand, and price action pressing into the 52-week high ceiling. [33]
The bull case continues to lean on a powerful trio:
The bear case is equally classic:
1. www.equitymaster.com, 2. www.marketsmojo.com, 3. www.equitymaster.com, 4. www.marketsmojo.com, 5. www.tickertape.in, 6. www.marketsmojo.com, 7. www.equitymaster.com, 8. www.marketsmojo.com, 9. www.reuters.com, 10. www.reuters.com, 11. www.goldmansachs.com, 12. www.moneycontrol.com, 13. www.icra.in, 14. nsearchives.nseindia.com, 15. www.pib.gov.in, 16. www.ndtvprofit.com, 17. www.businesstoday.in, 18. m.economictimes.com, 19. m.economictimes.com, 20. m.economictimes.com, 21. trendlyne.com, 22. www.investing.com, 23. www.icra.in, 24. www.tickertape.in, 25. www.investing.com, 26. www.marketsmojo.com, 27. www.equitymaster.com, 28. www.reuters.com, 29. www.investing.com, 30. www.moneycontrol.com, 31. www.marketsmojo.com, 32. www.ndtvprofit.com, 33. www.equitymaster.com, 34. www.reuters.com, 35. www.investing.com
Platinum price succeeded in forming a new bullish rally this morning, achieving the previously suggested main target by reaching $1973.00, facing a %161.8 Fibonacci extension level which forms strong barrier against bullish trading.
The stability of the trading below this barrier might activate the attempts of gathering some gains, to reach $1900.00 then attempts to test the extra support at $1860.00, while breaching the barrier and holding above it will ease the mission of recording new historical gains that might extend towards 2000.00 psychological barrier.
The expected trading range for today is between $1890.00 and $1970.00
Trend forecast: Fluctuated within the bullish track