Dollar Dynamics and Fed Outlook Remain Supportive

The US dollar staged a mild rebound from its weakest level since early October, though the move lacked follow-through. Expectations that the Federal Reserve will maintain a broadly accommodative policy stance continue to cap the dollar’s upside, reducing the appeal of yield-sensitive assets.

This environment remains constructive for gold, which benefits when real rates stay compressed and currency strength remains constrained. As a result, the metal has shown resilience despite short-term dollar firmness, with no signs of aggressive profit-taking emerging near recent highs.

Geopolitical Uncertainty Sustains Safe-Haven Demand

Ongoing geopolitical tensions continue to underpin safe-haven flows into bullion. Elevated uncertainty across multiple regions has encouraged investors to retain defensive exposure, reinforcing the view that the latest pullback reflects consolidation rather than a shift in trend.

Focus Turns to Key Japanese Data

With holiday-thinned markets reopening, attention will turn to upcoming Japanese economic releases on Friday. Tokyo core CPI is expected to slow to 2.5% year on year from 2.8%, while the unemployment rate is forecast to hold at 2.6%. Industrial production is seen falling 1.9% after a prior gain, and retail sales growth is projected to ease to 0.9%.

Weaker-than-expected data could add to global growth concerns, potentially reinforcing gold’s appeal as a defensive asset.

Short-Term Forecast

Gold near $4,479 targets $4,520 while holding $4,450 support; silver at $71.85 eyes $73.80, with $70.20 support limiting downside as markets reopen amid holiday-thinned liquidity and steady safe-haven demand outlook.

Natural gas “today” (Thursday, December 25, 2025) is a classic holiday-market paradox: not many people are trading, but the people who are trading can move prices. Across the major benchmarks, the story is broadly consistent—winter weather risk is back in focus, LNG demand remains a powerful support in the U.S., and Europe is watching both temperature swings and storage levels as it heads deeper into the heating season. ^[1]

Here’s what’s driving the market on Christmas Day:

• U.S. (Henry Hub/NYMEX): Front-month futures turned volatile in thin pre-holiday trading, slipping after touching a near two-week high as traders reacted to updated temperature forecasts, record output, and strong LNG feedgas flows. ^[2]
• Europe (TTF/UK): Dutch and British gas contracts nudged higher ahead of the holiday period, with colder forecasts boosting expected consumption—but plentiful supply flows helped cap the upside. ^[3]
• Asia (spot LNG): Northeast Asia spot LNG prices edged up week-on-week, supported by South Korean demand into a colder pocket, while China’s muted buying kept the broader tone soft. ^[4]

U.S. natural gas prices today: Henry Hub dips after a near two-week high

In the U.S., the headline on December 25 is holiday volatility—price action amplified by lighter participation.

Reuters reported that January NYMEX natural gas futures were down 16.6 cents (about 3.8%) at $4.242 per MMBtu, after earlier climbing to $4.593, the highest level since December 11. The pullback came after an 11% jump on Tuesday, described as the sharpest daily rise since October 30—exactly the sort of “thin-market rocket fuel” traders love to hate. ^[5]

Why the market moved

Three near-term drivers did the heavy lifting:

1) Weather risk is back (but not extreme—yet).
Meteorologists cited in the report forecast a slight nationwide temperature drop through January 8. Heating degree days (a proxy for heating demand) were expected to rise from 358 on Tuesday to 377 on Wednesday, still below a cited “normal” level of 447, but with forecasters anticipating colder conditions ahead. Translation: the market is paying for the option value of colder weather, even if the baseline forecast isn’t screaming “polar vortex.” ^[6]

2) LNG feedgas remains a major support beam.
Flows to the eight large U.S. LNG export plants averaged 18.4 Bcf/d so far in December, up from a monthly record 18.2 Bcf/d in November, according to the same Reuters reporting. When LNG terminals run hard, they effectively convert domestic gas into global gas—tightening the U.S. balance and making Henry Hub more sensitive to winter demand swings. ^[7]

3) Production is strong—record strong.
LSEG projected U.S. Lower 48 output averaging 109.8 Bcf/d in December, a record monthly high that narrowly tops November’s 109.6 Bcf/d record. Strong supply can blunt rallies, but it also creates a weird tension: when you’re producing at record levels and prices are still elevated, the market is basically admitting demand (especially LNG and winter heating) is doing real work. ^[8]

The “thin liquidity” effect (aka: the holiday gremlin)

One of the most important details for readers tracking natural gas prices today: volume was light. Reuters cited trading volume around 19,541 lots at that point in the session, with a market participant noting that holiday conditions can exaggerate intraday swings. In practical terms, that means price moves can look more dramatic than the underlying fundamentals justify—until normal liquidity returns. ^[9]

Europe natural gas prices today: TTF edges up as cold forecasts meet steady supply

European gas markets headed into Christmas with a small upward nudge, but not a breakout.

Reuters-reported prices showed the Dutch TTF front-month up €0.42 to €28.20/MWh (about $9.75/mmBtu), while the Dutch February contract rose €0.30 to €27.90/MWh. In the UK, the day-ahead contract was up 3.55 pence to 74.00 pence/therm. ^[10]

What’s pushing European gas right now

Colder weather expectations are the bullish spark.
An LSEG analyst quoted in the report said the Christmas break leaned “bullish,” with Germany and France expected to show higher consumption than last year, driven by a “steep temperature drop” expected over Christmas Day and Boxing Day. ^[11]

But supply is acting like a lid on the pot.
The same report emphasized that strong supply from Norway and LNG was expected to offset some demand-driven pressure. This balance—temperature-driven demand rising into winter, while supply and infrastructure keep the market from panicking—is exactly why Europe can see higher day-to-day volatility without necessarily revisiting crisis-era extremes. ^[12]

The number Europe keeps checking: storage

Europe’s gas storage is still a key psychological anchor. The report cited EU storage sites 66.49% full, referencing Gas Infrastructure Europe data. That’s not “empty,” but it’s also not a cozy overstuffed pantry—especially if the cold snaps arrive in clusters instead of politely spaced-out intervals. ^[13]

Asia spot LNG today: prices inch up as South Korea buys, China stays quiet

In Asia, spot LNG prices firmed modestly, but the bigger narrative remains a split screen: South Korea responding to cold, and China remaining reluctant.

Reuters-reported market estimates put the average LNG price for February delivery into Northeast Asia at $9.60/mmBtu, up from $9.50 last week—and still described as the lowest since April 2024. The same report noted that weak buying in China left prices down 34% since the start of 2025. ^[14]

Why China is the “quiet giant” in today’s LNG market

One analyst cited in the report pointed to “continuous soft demand,” weak economic indicators, and ample alternative supplies like coal in China, adding that the La Niña pattern hadn’t delivered the colder phases some expected—at least not yet. (In other words: if you can burn coal, and it’s cheaper, and the weather isn’t punishing you, you hesitate before paying for spot LNG.) ^[15]

Why South Korea is the “loud buyer” this week

South Korea showed more immediate spot interest because temperatures were expected to fall to two-year lows on December 26, according to a market source quoted by Reuters. The report also said five cargoes had been diverted from China to South Korea in recent weeks—an unusually concrete example of how quickly demand signals can reroute global molecules. ^[16]

The Europe–Asia tug-of-war: LNG pricing, freight, and where cargoes want to go

One of the most consequential “natural gas today” themes is not just price, but direction: where do flexible LNG cargoes flow next?

The Reuters report cited multiple European LNG price assessments for February delivery:

• S&P Global’s Northwest Europe LNG Marker (February, ex-ship): $9.001/mmBtu on Dec. 23, a $0.53 discount to TTF
• Argus: $9.015/mmBtu
• Spark Commodities (January): $9.110/mmBtu ^[17]

That pricing structure matters because it feeds directly into arbitrage math—especially once you add shipping.

LNG freight rates eased again

According to the report, Atlantic LNG shipping rates fell for a fourth week to $80,750/day, while Pacific rates eased to $71,250/day. Lower freight can widen the map of “profitable” routes, but the same analysis said the U.S. front-month arbitrage to Northeast Asia (via the Cape of Good Hope) narrowed—yet still pointed more toward Europe, with the Panama route only marginally favoring Asia. ^[18]

A key forward-looking signal: early Q1 2026 buying in Central and Eastern Europe

S&P Global’s Atlantic LNG manager was quoted saying that key LNG gateways into Central and Eastern Europe are emerging as firm buyers for early Q1 2026, aiming to ease pressure from declining Russian pipeline gas and LNG flows. With Asia and North Africa showing limited spot appetite, the report suggested incremental LNG supply may funnel into Europe. ^[19]

That’s the market’s quiet way of saying: Europe still needs to “buy insurance” through LNG, even when prices aren’t screaming crisis.

Russia and LNG shipping: a new ice-class tanker enters the chat

Another Christmas-week headline with real natural gas implications: LNG logistics in the Arctic.

Reuters-reported shipping news said Sovcomflot received the first Russian-built ice-class LNG tanker from the Zvezda shipyard, with plans to receive two more next year, according to Interfax citing the company’s CEO. The report underscored that sanctions related to the war in Ukraine have made it difficult for Russia to secure specialized gas carriers—particularly ships capable of operating in thick Arctic ice. ^[20]

The tanker, named Alexey Kosygin, is expected to join the fleet serving Arctic LNG 2, which the report noted is sanctioned by the United States. It also said Novatek (which owns 60% of Arctic LNG 2) has indicated 15 Arc7 ice-class tankers are eventually expected to be built at Zvezda, and that Novatek has contracted 21 of these tankers in total. ^[21]

Why this matters for natural gas markets: specialized shipping capacity can be a hard bottleneck. If you can produce LNG but can’t reliably move it—especially through ice conditions—then “supply” becomes seasonal, political, and more fragile than the headline production number suggests.

The data calendar: what’s missing today, and when it returns

Because it’s Christmas Day in the U.S., the normal weekly rhythm of government energy data is interrupted—something traders watch closely in winter.

• The U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) said there would be no Natural Gas Weekly Update released on Thursday, Dec. 25 (or Jan. 1), with the next NGWU scheduled for Jan. 8, 2026. ^[22]
• The EIA’s Weekly Natural Gas Storage Report holiday schedule shows the Christmas-related alternate release date set for Monday, Dec. 29, 2025 (12:00 p.m.). ^[23]

In winter, missing or delayed data doesn’t just create informational gaps—it can amplify uncertainty, especially when weather forecasts are shifting and prices are already jumpy on low volume.

A U.S. reliability sidebar: Texas ramps winter gas readiness checks

Not all “natural gas today” news is about price screens. Some of it is about whether the system holds together under stress.

A Texas-focused report said the Railroad Commission of Texas has stepped up winter inspections of natural gas infrastructure, conducting weatherization checks of critical facilities through March 2026. It also cited a milestone inventory figure: 524.9 Bcf of working gas in storage as of Nov. 30, 2025, described as the highest in more than 25 years. ^[24]

Given Texas’s outsized role in U.S. production and LNG feedgas supply, infrastructure readiness isn’t just a local concern—it’s part of the national winter reliability picture.

What to watch next in natural gas markets

As liquidity returns after the holiday window, the market is likely to reprice three things quickly:

Weather models (U.S., Europe, Northeast Asia):
If forecasts trend colder and more persistent, winter risk premiums can rebuild fast—especially with LNG facilities pulling hard on U.S. supply. ^[25]

LNG feedgas and export reliability:
The U.S. is leaning on LNG flows as a structural demand pillar. Any hiccup—operational or weather-related—can change balances quickly. ^[26]

Storage and withdrawals:
With the EIA storage report shifted to Dec. 29, the next official read on inventories will land when traders are back at their desks—potentially creating a sharper reaction than usual if the number surprises. ^[27]

Europe’s storage trajectory vs. cold snaps:
With storage cited around 66%, each cold spell is a “drawdown test.” If supply remains steady, Europe stays calm. If supply tightens while temperatures fall, the tone changes quickly. ^[28]

References

1. www.bairdmaritime.com, 2. www.bairdmaritime.com, 3. www.hellenicshippingnews.com, 4. www.hellenicshippingnews.com, 5. www.bairdmaritime.com, 6. www.bairdmaritime.com, 7. www.bairdmaritime.com, 8. www.bairdmaritime.com, 9. www.bairdmaritime.com, 10. www.hellenicshippingnews.com, 11. www.hellenicshippingnews.com, 12. www.hellenicshippingnews.com, 13. www.hellenicshippingnews.com, 14. www.hellenicshippingnews.com, 15. www.hellenicshippingnews.com, 16. www.hellenicshippingnews.com, 17. www.hellenicshippingnews.com, 18. www.hellenicshippingnews.com, 19. www.hellenicshippingnews.com, 20. www.hellenicshippingnews.com, 21. www.hellenicshippingnews.com, 22. www.eia.gov, 23. ir.eia.gov, 24. www.mrt.com, 25. www.bairdmaritime.com, 26. www.bairdmaritime.com, 27. ir.eia.gov, 28. www.hellenicshippingnews.com

Rio Tinto plc stock is ending 2025 with momentum—and with a long list of catalysts investors are trying to price in: record copper prices, a strategy reset under CEO Simon Trott, expanding lithium ambitions after a major acquisition, and fresh operational guidance stretching into 2026. Add in a legal dispute tied to sanctions and some governance constraints that affect buybacks, and Rio’s year-end story becomes more than “iron ore miner does iron ore things.”

Because December 25 is a market holiday in many regions, the most recent actionable pricing and news flow largely reflects Christmas Eve trading and the final pre-holiday news cycle.

Rio Tinto stock price today: where RIO stands heading into year-end

As of the latest available trade (Wednesday, Dec. 24, 2025), Rio Tinto plc (NYSE: RIO) was around $80.89.

In London, Rio’s ordinary shares have also been pressing higher. MarketWatch reported Rio Tinto shares reached £59.31 on Dec. 22, a new 52-week high at the time. ^[1] Simply Wall St noted the last close near £59.82 and highlighted a strong multi-month climb that has investors re-checking valuation assumptions. ^[2]

One reason you’ll see slightly different “performance” numbers depending on where you look: Rio Tinto is dual-listed (plc in London; Limited in Australia), and the NYSE listing is an ADR. FX moves and local market dynamics can widen the gap between headlines even when the underlying business story is the same.

The big force behind miners right now: copper just rewrote the record books

Copper has been the “gravity well” pulling diversified miners upward into late December. Reuters reported that London-listed miners gained as copper prices hit a record above $12,000, with Rio Tinto among the beneficiaries. ^[3]

The Financial Times put more detail around the move, linking the surge to tariff concerns and tight supply after disruptions at major mines—while also noting copper’s powerful 2025 run. ^[4]

For Rio Tinto stock, copper matters disproportionately not because copper is already the biggest revenue line (iron ore still dominates), but because copper is increasingly the growth narrative Rio wants the market to underwrite.

“Stronger, sharper and simpler”: Rio’s strategy reset and what it means for the stock

Rio Tinto used its December strategy briefing / Capital Markets Day messaging to frame the company as a leaner machine with clearer commodity priorities.

1) A simpler structure: three operating “super-buckets”

Rio said it is streamlining into three product groups:

• Iron Ore
• Copper
• Aluminium & Lithium ^[5]

That matters for investors because conglomerate complexity can hide costs, slow decision-making, and make capital allocation harder to judge. Rio is explicitly arguing it can run “tighter.”

2) Cost and productivity targets (the market loves these—until it doesn’t)

Rio disclosed $650 million of annualised productivity benefits achieved early in the program, and it flagged more as the simplification effort continues. ^[6] Reuters also reported the same figure and noted that some analysts wanted more cost-out than the initial headline number. ^[7]

Rio also pointed to an expected 4% reduction in unit costs from 2024 to 2030. ^[8]

3) Divestments: up to $5–$10 billion “released” from the asset base

This is one of the most market-sensitive takeaways. Rio is exploring ways to free up $5–$10 billion through divestments, third-party funding, and partnership/ownership options across parts of its footprint. ^[9]

Reuters added that assets potentially on the block include titanium and borates, as Rio tries to concentrate on the “right assets in the right markets.” ^[10]

4) Shareholder returns policy stays: 40–60%

Rio reiterated a 40–60% shareholder returns policy (a key anchor for income-focused investors who hold Rio for dividends across cycles). ^[11]

Rio Tinto’s 2025–2026 production guidance: the numbers investors will obsess over

Rio didn’t just talk strategy—it published real guidance that investors can model.

Updated 2025 guidance highlights

Rio upgraded 2025 copper production guidance to 860–875 kt, and it revised unit cost guidance down to 80–100 c/lb (from higher prior ranges). ^[12]

It also flagged changes elsewhere (including bauxite and IOC guidance updates). ^[13]

2026 guidance snapshot (selected)

Rio released 2026 guidance including:

• Total iron ore sales:343–366 Mt
• Pilbara:323–338 Mt
• Simandou:5–10 Mt
• Copper (consolidated):800–870 kt
• Lithium (LCE):61–64 kt
• Group capex: up to ~$11bn ^[14]

This guidance matters because it gives the market an “official” runway for 2026 earnings sensitivity, especially under different commodity price decks.

Copper growth: Oyu Tolgoi and the push toward 1 million tonnes

Reuters reported Rio is shifting focus toward copper and is aiming to produce 1 million tonnes a year by 2030, with Oyu Tolgoi in Mongolia a major lever. ^[15]

Why the market cares: when copper is setting records, investors tend to pay up for miners with credible copper volume growth and relatively defensible cost curves.

Iron ore: still the profit engine—and now facing a settlement index twist

Iron ore remains Rio’s largest earnings driver, especially through the Pilbara system. Late December brought a niche but notable headline: Rio Tinto plans to replace the iron ore index used for settlement for some China shipments, according to a client notice referenced by traders.

Mining.com reported Rio emailed Chinese clients indicating Fastmarkets MB iron ore indices would replace Platts indices for settlement of shipments in the first two months of 2026, though it wasn’t clear why or whether it applied to all Chinese customers. ^[16]

This isn’t necessarily a “fundamentals earthquake,” but it is the kind of plumbing change that traders and contract negotiators watch closely—especially when pricing power is contested.

Pilbara optionality: Rhodes Ridge moves forward

Rio also pushed forward on long-life iron ore optionality in Western Australia.

The company said the Rhodes Ridge Joint Venture approved a $191 million feasibility study to progress the first phase of the Rhodes Ridge project, targeting an initial 40–50 million tonnes per year of iron ore capacity. ^[17]

Additional details Rio disclosed:

• JV ownership: Rio 50%, Mitsui 40%, AMB Holdings 10%
• The feasibility study is expected to conclude in 2029
• First ore (subject to approvals) is expected by 2030
• Rhodes Ridge has potential capacity of ~100 Mtpa longer-term ^[18]

For Rio Tinto stock, Rhodes Ridge is less about next quarter and more about “can Pilbara remain a multi-decade cash machine while the company pivots capital toward copper and lithium?”

Lithium: Rio’s big bet after the Arcadium acquisition—and the sober reality check

Rio’s lithium narrative got much more serious in 2025.

S&P Global reported that Rio’s $6.7 billion acquisition of Arcadium Lithium closed in March, giving Rio a much larger lithium resource base and a platform for scaled growth. ^[19]

Rio’s lithium ambition (as summarized in that reporting and Rio’s own briefing):

• Build toward ~200,000 t/year LCE capacity by 2028 (from ~75,000)
• Spend about $1 billion annually for the next three years on growth projects in Canada and Argentina
• Target lower C1 operating costs across brine assets (S&P cited $5–$8/kg) ^[20]

But S&P Global also captured the key tension: capex inflation and execution risk. Industry voices in the piece described Rio’s published capex numbers as “sobering,” with costs in Argentina affected by inputs, energy, and inflation dynamics—meaning the margin story depends heavily on delivery discipline and market timing. ^[21]

This is important for Google News/Discover readers because lithium is where mining stories often go to die: grand spreadsheets meet geology, inflation, and politics.

Decarbonisation angle: battery-electric haul truck trials in the Pilbara

Rio and peers are also trying to decarbonise the most diesel-heavy part of mining: haulage.

Reuters reported BHP began a trial of two battery-electric haul trucks at its Jimblebar iron ore mine, under a collaboration involving BHP, Rio Tinto and Caterpillar, to evaluate how electric haulage could scale in large Pilbara operations. ^[22] BHP’s own release confirmed the arrival of Caterpillar’s battery-electric trucks and the start of on-site testing in collaboration with Rio Tinto. ^[23]

For Rio stock, this is less about immediate earnings and more about:

• Longer-term operating cost structure (diesel vs power)
• Scope 1 emissions trajectory
• Permitting and social license pressures over the next decade

Analyst forecasts and price targets: what the Street is saying into 2026

Analyst targets are not truth tablets delivered from Mount Bloomberg, but they do shape positioning—especially when a stock is near highs.

UK listing (LON: RIO): “Hold” vibes dominate

MarketScreener reported Berenberg maintained a Neutral view and adjusted a target price around GBX 5,200 in a December note. ^[24] TheFly (via TipRanks) also reported Berenberg lifting a target to 5,300 GBp while keeping a Hold rating. ^[25]

MarketBeat’s snapshot for the London listing shows:

• Consensus rating: Hold
• Average target: GBX 5,570
• High/low targets: GBX 6,950 / GBX 4,900 ^[26]

Simply Wall St highlighted a separate consensus framing, citing a consensus target near £51.491, with a wide spread between bullish and bearish targets. ^[27]

NYSE ADR (NYSE: RIO): mixed targets, slightly different tone

MarketBeat’s ADR page shows:

• Consensus rating: Moderate Buy
• Average target: $79.00 (around the current price region in that snapshot) ^[28]

TipRanks shows a smaller set of recent analysts (as displayed on the page) with:

• Average target: $88.13
• High/low: $129.50 / $68.00 ^[29]

Why the difference between platforms? Methodology and coverage lists vary (how many analysts, how recent, whether older targets are included, how ADR vs local listing is handled). Treat these as sentiment indicators, not precision instruments.

Commodity price forecasts: copper optimism remains, but 2026 could cool from the peak

With copper now a centerpiece of Rio’s “growth metals” story, bank outlooks matter.

Reuters reported Goldman Sachs expects copper to consolidate around $11,400/ton in 2026 amid tariff uncertainty, while still favoring copper on long-term electrification demand and constrained supply. ^[30]

The nuance for Rio investors: even if copper cools from record highs, the market may still reward producers that can grow volume and improve costs—which is exactly what Rio is trying to signal with its Oyu Tolgoi and productivity messaging.

Key risks investors are pricing (or ignoring at their peril)

1) Legal and geopolitical risk: the Rusal lawsuit

Reuters reported a Russian court ruled in favor of Rusal in a $1.32 billion lawsuit against Rio Tinto tied to a dispute over a joint alumina refinery in Queensland after sanctions-related actions. Rio rejected the Russian proceedings and said it would defend its position. ^[31]

Even if investors discount enforceability, this is headline risk—and it intersects with geopolitics, sanctions, and cross-border legal complexity.

2) Buyback constraints: the Chinalco overhang

Reuters reported Rio is working with its main shareholder Chinalco on solutions to governance constraints that restrict buybacks. Reuters also noted discussion of potential structures (including an asset-for-equity concept previously reported) and referenced an ownership cap set by Australian authorities. ^[32]

For shareholders, buybacks are a lever that can materially change capital return optics—especially in strong commodity tape.

3) Execution risk in lithium (and capex discipline generally)

Rio’s own plan ties lithium growth to market/returns discipline, but the sector’s history is full of “great assets, painful timing.” The S&P Global reporting underscored cost escalation and the pressure it puts on returns if lithium pricing doesn’t cooperate. ^[33]

What to watch next: the near-term calendar for Rio Tinto stock

The next catalyst cluster is likely to hit in January, when markets are back at full volume and investors stop pretending holidays are a personality trait.

MarketScreener’s calendar lists Rio’s Q4 2025 Sales and Revenue Release / Operations Review around Jan. 20. ^[34]

Into early 2026, the market will be watching:

• Pilbara shipments and realised iron ore pricing
• Copper volumes and costs (especially the Oyu Tolgoi ramp)
• Any concrete steps on divestments (titanium/borates and other assets)
• Updates on lithium project capex/commissioning cadence
• Clarity on buybacks and shareholder return mechanics

Bottom line: why Rio Tinto plc stock is a 2026 “macro + execution” story

Rio Tinto stock is riding a late-2025 tailwind from metals—especially copper—while also trying to convince investors it deserves a higher-quality multiple: tighter operations, a clearer portfolio, and disciplined capital allocation.

The bullish case is basically: record (or near-record) copper + credible copper growth + still-massive iron ore cash flows + shareholder returns discipline.

The bear case is: commodity cycles revert, lithium costs bite, geopolitical/legal noise grows, and “simplification” delivers fewer real dollars than the strategy slides imply.

As of Dec. 25, 2025, the market seems to be leaning optimistic—but not blindly: a lot of analyst framing still reads “Hold,” which often means “we believe the story, but the easy money may already be in the price.” ^[35]

References

1. www.marketwatch.com, 2. simplywall.st, 3. www.reuters.com, 4. www.ft.com, 5. www.riotinto.com, 6. www.riotinto.com, 7. www.reuters.com, 8. www.riotinto.com, 9. www.riotinto.com, 10. www.reuters.com, 11. www.riotinto.com, 12. www.riotinto.com, 13. www.riotinto.com, 14. www.riotinto.com, 15. www.reuters.com, 16. www.mining.com, 17. www.riotinto.com, 18. www.riotinto.com, 19. www.spglobal.com, 20. www.spglobal.com, 21. www.spglobal.com, 22. www.reuters.com, 23. www.bhp.com, 24. www.marketscreener.com, 25. www.tipranks.com, 26. www.marketbeat.com, 27. simplywall.st, 28. www.marketbeat.com, 29. www.tipranks.com, 30. www.reuters.com, 31. www.reuters.com, 32. www.reuters.com, 33. www.spglobal.com, 34. www.marketscreener.com, 35. simplywall.st

Coca-Cola Company (KO) declined in its latest intraday trading, breaking below its 50-day SMA, which has increased near-term negative pressure on the stock. This move comes alongside the emergence of a negative crossover on the RSI, reinforcing short-term weakness. However, the main bullish trend still dominates the medium term, with price action continuing to move alongside a supportive upward trendline, which limits the downside risk for now.

Therefore we expect the stock price to move higher in the upcoming trading, as long as it remains stable above the support level at $68.80, to target the resistance level at $71.30.

Today’s price forecast: Neutral