The main category of All News Articles.
You can use the search box below to find what you need.
[wd_asp id=1]
The main category of All News Articles.
You can use the search box below to find what you need.
[wd_asp id=1]
But beneath the rebound lies a deeper concern — long-term holders are selling big. According to 10x Research, veteran investors have offloaded around 400,000 BTC in the last month, worth nearly $45 billion. Markus Thielen, the firm’s head of research, warned that this “massive exodus” has left the market unbalanced. “Conviction among long-term holders is eroding,” he said, adding that the selling pressure could continue well into next year.
Data from K33 Research shows over 319,000 Bitcoin have been reactivated from wallets dormant for six to twelve months — a clear sign of profit-taking. “While some reactivation stems from internal transfers, much reflects real selling,” said Vetle Lunde, head of research at K33. The pattern suggests many investors are locking in gains as prices stall, with confidence slipping after months of strong momentum.
Unlike the October crash, when $19 billion in leveraged positions were wiped out, this selloff has been driven mainly by spot market selling. In the past 24 hours, only $2 billion in crypto positions were liquidated — modest compared to prior washouts. This means the pressure is coming from investors willingly exiting, not from margin calls. Meanwhile, open interest in Bitcoin futures remains muted, and options traders are loading up on put contracts targeting $80,000, signaling expectations of more downside.
Thielen said the key driver now is the imbalance between sellers and buyers. “The whales are just not buying,” he noted, pointing out that wallets holding 100–1,000 BTC have sharply cut accumulation. Institutional demand, which once cushioned Bitcoin’s pullbacks, has also cooled. With the 50-day moving average around $113,379 and the 200-day near $109,952, Bitcoin remains technically in a bearish zone.
Looking ahead, Thielen expects the unwind to last until spring 2026, similar to the 2021–2022 bear market, when over 1 million BTC were sold by large holders over several months. He doesn’t expect a collapse but sees room for a further decline toward $85,000, his maximum downside target. “We could see Bitcoin consolidating or drifting slightly lower from here before stability returns,” he said. Despite the fear, institutional interest hasn’t vanished completely. Some analysts argue this reset could strengthen Bitcoin’s long-term setup, allowing a healthier base before the next rally. For now, all eyes are on the $100,000 mark — the new psychological floor. Holding that level could mean the correction is near its end. But slipping below it again might trigger the next leg of this crypto downturn. Bitcoin price prediction: The near-term outlook suggests cautious consolidation around $100K–$105K, with upside resistance near $110K and a potential downside floor around $85K if selling continues. The next few weeks will reveal whether Bitcoin’s bounce is the start of recovery or just a brief relief rally before another wave of pressure hits.
Bitcoin (BTCUSD) rose 1.99% to around $103,494, recovering from a sharp drop below $100,000 earlier this week. The world’s largest cryptocurrency gained about $2,025 in the past 24 hours after Tuesday’s 7.4% plunge — its steepest fall since June. The day’s trading range hovered between $98,950 and $104,026, showing the ongoing market volatility.
At current levels, Bitcoin’s market capitalization stands near $2.04 trillion, with $793.8 million in trading volume over the last 24 hours. The digital asset opened at $101,468, the same as its previous close, suggesting cautious sentiment among traders.
The latest correction wasn’t triggered by leverage this time. Instead, it’s being driven by long-term Bitcoin holders unloading nearly 400,000 BTC, worth around $45 billion, over the past month. According to Markus Thielen of 10x Research, this wave of selling has left the market “unbalanced.”
Data from K33 Research shows that 319,000 Bitcoin have been reactivated in recent weeks, mostly from wallets inactive for six to twelve months — a clear sign of profit-taking. “While some reactivation stems from internal transfers, much reflects real selling,” said Vetle Lunde, head of research at K33.
Bitcoin dropped below $100,000 for the first time since mid-June, marking a 20% decline from its record high of $126,296 reached last month. The pullback follows a broader “risk-off” shift across financial markets as investors reassess inflation and rate-cut expectations.
Unlike October’s crash, which was fueled by forced liquidations, the current slide stems from steady selling in the spot market. Around $2 billion in crypto positions were liquidated over the last day — far below the $19 billion wiped out in October’s derivatives-driven crash.
Open interest in Bitcoin futures remains subdued, while options traders are increasingly betting on downside risk, with many targeting the $80,000 level through put contracts.
According to Thielen, Bitcoin’s direction now depends on how quickly new buyers can absorb the coins long-term holders are selling. “Mega whales,” who hold between 1,000 and 10,000 BTC, started reducing their exposure months ago. Institutional buyers have slowed down, and accumulation among wallets holding 100–1,000 BTC has dropped sharply.
“The whales are just not buying,” Thielen said, warning that this imbalance could keep pressure on prices.
Bitcoin’s 50-day moving average sits at $113,379, while the 200-day average is around $109,952 — both above current prices, signaling a bearish setup. Thielen expects the ongoing unwind to continue well into spring 2026, possibly mirroring the 2021–2022 bear cycle, when over 1 million BTC were sold across a year.
While he doesn’t expect a crash, Thielen sees potential for further declines, with a maximum downside target of $85,000. “We could consolidate and drift a bit lower from here,” he said.
Despite the selloff, institutional interest remains firm, suggesting the correction may represent a healthy reset rather than a deeper collapse. Traders are closely watching whether Bitcoin can hold above $100,000, which may define the next trend in the crypto market.
During perimenopause and menopause, hot flashes can happen anytime day or night. Heat rises up through your body. Your face, neck and chest might become red, and you may start sweating. And it’s more than just a pain in the neck – hot flashes, especially when they’re severe, can be really disruptive. In fact, about 3 in 10 women with hot flashes have them so badly they need treatment.
Hot flashes — one of the two vasomotor symptoms (VMS) of menopause — happen when a hormone in your body called estrogen begins to drop. Estrogen affects the part of your brain that controls body temperature. Up to 8 out of 10 pre- and postmenopausal women experience hot flashes, and they can last between seven and 10 years — and Black and Hispanic women often experience hot flashes for even longer.
The most effective treatment for hot flashes is hormone therapy (HT). But not all women can take hormonal medication for a variety of reasons. “This includes women who’ve had estrogen-sensitive breast or uterine cancer, heart attack, stroke, blood clots or pulmonary embolisms,” said JoAnn Pinkerton, M.D., medical director of Midlife Health Center and member of HealthyWomen’s Women’s Health Advisory Council. Other women may choose not to take HT for personal reasons.
Now, these women have a new option. In October, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved a new hormone-free drug called elinzanetant to help treat moderate-to-severe hot flashes. It joins fezolinetant, which was approved for the same indication in 2023. With more nonhormonal treatments available than ever before, it can be hard to know which one is right for you.
Here’s what you need to know about hot flash treatments.
Two new hormone-free medications target the temperature control center of the brain to reduce hot flashes. The medications stop hot flashes by counteracting the drop in estrogen by binding to and blocking the parts of your brain that allow your temperature to go up when your hormone level drops.
Elinzanetant (brand name: Lynkuet): In clinical studies, elinzanetant reduced hot flashes by 73% and also helped women sleep better.
Common side effects of elinzanetant:
Fezolinetant (brand name: Veozah): Has been shown to improve mood, sleep and overall quality of life.
Common side effects of fezolinetant include:
It’s always important to talk to your HCP about whether any prescription medication is right for you. Elinzanetant and fezolinetant can interfere with certain medications, so it’s important to tell them what else you’re taking.
Both of these non-hormonal hot flash treatments are processed through your liver, so you need to get your liver checked every three months if you take them. And for fezolinetant, you need to have a baseline liver level recorded before you start. As with any medication, certain people should not take these drugs.
Elinzanetant and fezolinetant can also be expensive and may not be covered by insurance, but you may be able to find coupons and savings opportunities on their websites or by asking your pharmacist.
Some medications not specifically meant for hot flashes have been shown to help reduce VMS symptoms. Pinkerton said that more research is needed to understand why, but these medications seem to have an effect on the temperature regulator in your brain.
Antidepressants including SSRIs and SNRIs reduce hot flashes in up to 64% of women. These can be a good choice for women who struggle with depression or anxiety and have VMS symptoms.
Side effects of SSRIs and SNRIs can include:
Gabapentin (brand names: Horizant, Gralise and Neurontin) is a nerve-blocker that can help ease the severity of hot flashes by up to 51%. Because it can make you drowsy, it’s often prescribed for women with hot flashes who also have difficulty sleeping and because it’s a nerve blocker, it can also be an option for women who have neuropathic pain.
Side effects of gabapentin can include:
Oxybutynin (brand name: Ditropan) is a medication prescribed for overactive bladder that can reduce hot flashes by up to 86%. This may be a good choice for women who have both urinary issues and hot flashes.
Side effects of oxybutynin include:
Over-the-counter supplements for hot flashes contain vitamins, minerals, amino acids and other ingredients that can help reduce symptoms. Pinkerton said these options may help women with mild-to-moderate symptoms, but they won’t help with severe symptoms. She also warned that they are not FDA-approved, which means they aren’t regulated, may not be proven to help, and may contain contaminants.
EstroG-100 is a supplement rooted in Asian folk medicine. In one study, EstroG-100 reduced hot flashes after 12 weeks of use. It may also help with other menopause symptoms, including sleep issues.
S-equol is a soy-based product that may benefit some, but not all, menopausal women. More studies are needed to find out how effective it is.
Black cohosh is an herbal supplement native to North America that is thought to reduce symptoms of menopause. There is limited evidence to support its use. It can cause mild side effects and interact with certain drugs. It’s important to be extremely cautious if using this herbal remedy.
Red clover is an herb from southeast Europe that has been traditionally used to treat upper- respiratory tract infections. There is some evidence that red clover can help menopausal symptoms, but more clinical studies are needed.
Making certain lifestyle changes can help with the severity and number of hot flashes you have. Pinkerton suggested moderate exercise, getting at least seven hours of sleep each night, and eating a Mediterranean diet high in protein, fruits and vegetables. You should also quit smoking and limit alcohol and caffeine.
An individualized approach based on your symptoms is the best way to address hot flashes.
If your symptoms are mild, Pinkerton said over-the-counter options could work. But if your hot flashes are disrupting your work, sleep or relationships, it’s a good idea to schedule an appointment with your HCP. “Make sure that someone’s listening to you, and that they’re offering evidence-based therapies,” she said.
From Your Site Articles
Related Articles Around the Web
Newark, Delaware, USA, November 5th, 2025, FinanceWire
Rogers brings institutional partnerships and strategic capital expertise to accelerate the adoption of the hashrate-backed Bitcoin yield protocol.
TeraHash, the Bitcoin-native yield layer unlocking $20B+ in annual mining revenue for DeFi, today named Hunter Rogers as Co-Founder. Rogers joins from TRON DAO, where he led ecosystem development and investment strategy for one of the world’s largest blockchain networks. At TRON he closed multimillion-dollar partnerships and helped scale institutional adoption.
The appointment strengthens TeraHash’s leadership as the protocol prepares for mainnet. The project has already attracted more than 8 million users during its pre-launch phase.
Strategic Leadership for Bitcoin’s Yield Infrastructure
At TeraHash, Rogers will lead ecosystem partnerships, institutional outreach, and community growth initiatives. His brief is to position TeraHash as the institutional standard for Bitcoin mining yield, which delivers staking rewards in crypto (up to 50% APY) through liquid and composable DeFi infrastructure.
“Bitcoin’s next evolution lies in making its $20 billion annual mining yield accessible through transparent, on-chain infrastructure,” said Hunter Rogers, Co-Founder of TeraHash. “TeraHash is building that bridge, as it transforms physical hashrate into liquid, composable, and accessible yield primitives for institutions and individuals alike. I’m excited to help scale this ecosystem globally, as well as establish TeraHash as the definitive Bitcoin yield layer for DeFi.”
Proven Track Record in Blockchain Infrastructure
Before joining TeraHash, Rogers was Senior Ecosystem Development and Investment Lead at TRON DAO, where he:
Rogers brings deep expertise in blockchain infrastructure, capital strategy, and ecosystem development. He completed Executive Education at The Wharton School, specializing in Mergers & Acquisitions, Corporate Development Strategies, and Artificial Intelligence for Business. His experience covers DePIN infrastructure, institutional tokenization, and AI integration. These are competencies directly relevant to TeraHash’s mission of building scalable, institutional-grade Bitcoin yield infrastructure.
Timing Bitcoin DeFi’s Inflection Point
Rogers joins as Bitcoin DeFi gains momentum. The rise of Ordinals, BRC-20s, and growing institutional interest have accelerated activity in BTCFi. Still, a native, composable yield product for Bitcoin mining has been missing.
TeraHash addresses that gap by issuing $THS tokens that represent real mining power. Users stake $THS (each token = 1 TH/s) and receive daily Bitcoin rewards without the need to run miners or handle operations. The protocol is composable with DeFi, and it enables integrations with lending platforms, yield aggregators, and trading venues.
Market-Leading Traction and Infrastructure
TeraHash has shown early traction:
• Has secured $300M+ in equipment contracts to lock supply;
• Attracted 8M+ users during pre-launch;
• Recorded ~50% historical APY (7x higher than Ethereum staking).
The protocol is completing a Strategic Round for institutional participants and is on track for mainnet launch.
About TeraHash
TeraHash is the Bitcoin-native yield layer bringing institutional-grade mining yields to DeFi. By tokenizing real mining hashrate into liquid staking positions, TeraHash enables users to earn up to 50% yearly Bitcoin yields in rewards without operational complexity. The protocol features a dual-token model: $THS (yield token representing hashrate) and $HASH (governance and yield amplification token with 21M fixed supply). TeraHash is backed by strategic partners & advisors, and leading protocols & blockchain infrastructure providers.
For more information, users can visit TeraHash.xyz
TeraHash
pr@terahash.xyz
Gold traded within a well-defined range throughout the first half of Wednesday, now hovering around $3,980 per troy ounce in the American session. The lack of a clear catalyst kept investors in cautious mode, although the US Dollar (USD) retained its positive tone across the FX board.
Finally, the United States (US) released the ADP Employment Change survey, which showed that the private sector added 42,000 new job positions in October, better than the upwardly revised -29,000 posted in September.
Additionally, the ISM Services Purchasing Managers’ Index (PMI) improved to 52.4 in October, much better than the previous 50 or the expected 50.8. Upon closer examination, the Prices Paid Index, which tracks inflation, increased to 70.0 from 69.4, while the Employment Index rose to 48.2 from 47.2. Finally, the New Orders Index rose to 56.2, from 50.4.
Aside from that, speculative interest kept a close eye on the US elections. Democrats notched victories in multiple states, not good news for President Donald Trump, who blamed GOP losses on the ongoing shutdown. Indeed, California, Virginia, and most likely New Jersey have new Democratic governors, while New York City voted for progressive Zohran Mamdani and his affordability platform.
Meanwhile, Wall Street reversed Tuesday’s losses, and the three major indexes trade in the green after the positive surprise provided by data, although gains are modest. Overall, market players seem cautiously optimistic and willing to continue betting on the Greenback.
In the 4-hour chart, the XAU/USD pair is currently trading at around $3,980, up $19 for the day. From a technical point of view, a bearish 20 Simple Moving Average (SMA) at $3,986 contained advances, while converging with a marginally bullish 200 SMA, the latter at $3,996. Further up, the 100 SMA acts as resistance at $4,095.Technical indicators, in the meantime, reflect the lack of directional strength. The Momentum indicator recovered but remains below its midline, while the Relative Strength Index (RSI) indicator holds flat at 48.
In the daily chart, the XAU/USD is developing below the 20-day Simple Moving Average, which currently stands at $4,084. However, the pair is above the longer ones with the 100-day SMA at $3,602 and the 200-day SMA at $3,365 acting as mid-term dynamic supports. At the same time, the Momentum indicator plunged below its midline, and maintaining its downward strength, while the RSI indicator remains directionless at around its 50 level, skewing the risk to the downside without confirming an imminent slide.
(This content was partially created with the help of an AI tool)
You can see that the U.S. dollar initially tried to rally against the Japanese yen during trading on Tuesday, but it is struggling. We did fall enough to go looking to the ¥153 level. The ¥153 level is an area that had been a significant resistance barrier and now could end up being a significant support level based on market memory.
If we do in fact see a little bit of a bounce, then it’s likely that the overall uptrend continues, and that does make a certain amount of sense considering that the interest rate differential continues to favor the greenback. The Bank of Japan will more likely than not have to stay somewhat loose with monetary policy, and the Federal Reserve has recently stated at the FOMC press conference that they are not ready to cut rates automatically, at least in December. So, we’ll just have to wait and see how this plays out.
This is a market that won’t go straight up in the air forever, but I do think it goes higher over the longer term. A little bit of a drop and then a bounce opens up the possibility of value hunters coming in and picking up the U.S. dollar, jumping into this overall trend. If we break down below the ¥153 level, then the ¥152 level becomes support as well.
I have no interest in shorting this pair. The Japanese yen itself is weak against most currencies, and I think the U.S. dollar won’t be any different. All things being equal, I do think that we are going higher. We will probably go looking to the ¥155 level next, but it is going to be choppy and positive overall as the market has been more or less a grind to the upside. Ultimately, this is a market that I think is going to continue to look for value on dips and take advantage of them.
Want to trade our USD/JPY forex analysis and predictions? Here’s a list of forex brokers in Japan to check out.
Christopher Lewis has been trading Forex and has over 20 years experience in financial markets. Chris has been a regular contributor to Daily Forex since the early days of the site. He writes about Forex for several online publications, including FX Empire, Investing.com, and his own site, aptly named The Trader Guy. Chris favours technical analysis methods to identify his trades and likes to trade equity indices and commodities as well as Forex. He favours a longer-term trading style, and his trades often last for days or weeks.
Berberine, a compound found in herbs like barberry and goldenseal, has gained popularity for its potential to support weight, blood sugar, and heart health naturally. Initial research appears promising, but additional studies are needed to confirm the benefits.
Cardano (ADA) continues to face bearish pressure as the cryptocurrency struggles to hold above the $0.49 support zone. The asset has maintained a downward trajectory for several weeks, with sellers dominating short-term momentum.
ADA currently trades around $0.534, remaining well below key moving averages. The persistent weakness reflects a broader market slowdown, as traders exit leveraged positions and sentiment cools across altcoins.
ADA has been trading below its 20, 50, 100, and 200-EMA levels, underscoring sustained bearish momentum. Each rebound attempt toward the $0.60–$0.65 …
Read The Full Article Cardano Price Prediction: ADA Price Faces Extended Weakness as Sellers Retain Control On Coin Edition.
November is Lung Cancer Awareness Month.
Lung cancer has been the leading cause of cancer death in the United States for many years. And it accounts for about 1 in 5 of all cancer deaths throughout the country. In fact, more Americans die from lung cancer than from breast, prostate and colon cancer combined.
The American Cancer Society (ACS) estimates that about 125,000 Americans will die from lung cancer this year — and about 60,000 of those will be women.
Smoking is still the leading cause of lung cancer, with the ACS estimating that tobacco use causes about 8 out of 10 lung cancer cases.
But there’s some good news, too. New cases of lung cancer have decreased by an average of 2.4% each year according to the latest statistics. And death rates have fallen an average of 4.2% per year over the last decade.
Anti-smoking efforts have helped many Americans quit smoking or, better yet, never start. And lung cancer treatments have become much more effective over time.
One more factor helps account for these improvements: lung cancer screening for people at high risk. Researchers estimate that lung cancer screening could reduce the lung cancer death rate by up to 20%.
Here are some answers to frequently asked questions about lung cancer screening.
In general, healthcare providers (HCPs) use screening tests to check for disease in healthy people who don’t have symptoms. The goal of screening is to find disease in its early stages, when treatment is most likely to be effective.
Lung cancer screening consists of a low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) scan of the lungs to look for lung cancer. This screening is currently recommended only for people at high risk for developing lung cancer.
To do this fast and painless test, you lie on a table that moves through a CT scanner to create clear images of your lungs.
The U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF), a group that reviews scientific evidence to make patient-care recommendations, issued their most current recommendations in 2021. They recommend annual lung cancer screening for people who meet all of these requirements:
Compared to previous versions, the USPSTF’s current guidelines lowered the age to start screening from 55 to 50 and dropped the minimum number of pack years from 30 to 20.
These changes significantly increased the number of women — especially Black women — who are considered high risk for lung cancer.
The ACS also has a lung cancer screening guideline. It has one important difference from the USPSTF guideline: The ACS recommends yearly scans regardless of how long ago you stopped smoking.
Scientists who study tobacco use the term “pack year” to measure how much people have smoked over time. Multiply the number of cigarette packs you’ve smoked per day by the number of years you’ve smoked. That’s your pack year.
If you smoked two packs a day for 10 years, that’s 20 pack years, which means you’re eligible for lung cancer screening. If you smoked one pack a day for 15 years, that’s 15 pack years and below the 20 pack-year threshold for screening.
All screening tests carry the potential for both benefits and risks. That’s why you and your HCP should discuss your personal history and whether you should be screened for lung cancer. Shared decision-making means reviewing this information and creating a plan for your care together.
It’s important to note that smoking is currently the only risk factor for lung cancer that current screening guidelines consider.
Other potential causes of lung cancer like air pollution, radon exposure, secondhand smoke and genetic mutations are not included in today’s guidelines. Scientists are studying whether personalized screening approaches would identify more cases of lung cancer and potentially save more lives.
Read: How Shared Decision-Making Can Lead to Better Healthcare >>
The main benefit of lung cancer screening is the possibility of preventing death from lung cancer by catching it as soon as possible.
The American Lung Association (ALA) reports that lung cancer screening finds over half of lung cancer cases at an early stage when it’s more treatable.
One study found that only about 1 in 4 cases of lung cancers were found at an early stage without screening.
Lung cancer screening is unlikely to miss cancer, but it can happen. This is known as a false negative result.
Test results that suggest a person has cancer when they don’t are called false positives. The ALA estimates that about 12-14% of a person’s first lung cancer screenings will have a false positive. But only about 6% of repeat scans show false positives because HCPscompare scans over time to look for changes.
One potential con to lung cancer screening is that it may also identify cancers that may never have caused harm if left alone. Rarely, lung cancers grow slowly and without causing symptoms. But any kind of lung cancer diagnosis means your HCP will likely recommend treatment. And treating cancer that is unlikely to harm you is called overtreatment.
Screening with LDCT also involves the use of low-dose radiation to capture images of your body. Over time, this radiation can cause health problems. But it’s important to know that LDCTs use much less radiation than standard CT scans.
According to the ALA’s State of Lung Cancer Report, only 16% of eligible people received lung cancer screening in 2022.
Various real-world barriers may discourage some eligible people from getting lung cancer screening. For example, some high-risk people may not know that they are eligible for lung cancer screening.
Some longtime or former smokers may also hold back from screening because of anxiety that they might have lung cancer or worries about the stigma facing people with lung cancer, that they somehow deserve to be sick.
Transportation issues and physical access to LDCT screening centers can also keep people from getting screened. This is especially true for people who live in rural communities.
If you’re eligible for lung cancer screening, cost is unlikely to be a barrier. Medicare and most private insurance plans cover lung cancer screening for eligible people at 100%. That means you likely won’t have any out-of-pocket cost — just like mammograms and other screening tests. However, any additional testing and follow-up scans between screenings may have a cost, such as a co-pay or deductible.
This educational resource was created with support from Merck.
From Your Site Articles
Related Articles Around the Web
Natural Gas Price Trends Analysis in North America: Q3 2025 Break Down
Natural Gas Prices in United States:
As of Q3 2025, the average Natural Gas price in the USA is USD 3.81/MMBtu. Natural Gas prices are generally stable because of the seasonal fluctuations in demand described in the Natural Gas Price Index Report. Supply and demand are stable. Production has not been subject to major fluctuations, and U.S. prices are mostly stable according to Natural Gas Price Historical Data. Regional price variations are caused by differences in storage and heating demand.
Get the Real-Time Prices Analysis: https://www.imarcgroup.com/natural-gas-pricing-report/requestsample
Note: The analysis can be tailored to align with the customer’s specific needs.
Natural Gas Price Trends Analysis in APAC: Q3 2025 Overview
Natural Gas Prices in China:
During the third quarter of 2025, Natural Gas prices in China stayed at USD 2.72/MMBtu following the Natural Gas Price Index Report because the government supports renewable energy investments and imports LNG. Natural Gas prices stabilized according to historical data since earlier fluctuations occurred because industrial demand increased, and supply chains adjusted.
Regional Analysis: The price analysis can be extended to provide detailed natural gas price information for the following list of countries.
China, India, Indonesia, Pakistan, Bangladesh, Japan, Philippines, Vietnam, Thailand, South Korea, Malaysia, Nepal, Taiwan, Sri Lanka, Hongkong, Singapore, Australia, and New Zealand, among other Asian countries.
Natural Gas Price Trends Analysis in MEA: Q3 2025 Overview
Natural Gas Prices in Saudi Arabia:
Saudi Arabia’s Natural Gas prices reflect stable domestic conditions and policies toward diversification of energy sources, maintaining its price of USD 2.75/MMBtu in Q3 2025. Production trends, particularly in the petrochemical sector which sustained consumption levels, also contributed to this price stability. Compared with Natural Gas Price Historical Data, the country has cheap extraction and investments in infrastructure that provide long-term stability.
Regional Analysis: The price analysis can be extended to provide detailed natural gas price information for the following list of countries.
Saudi Arabia, UAE, Israel, Iran, South Africa, Nigeria, Oman, Kuwait, Qatar, Iraq, Egypt, Algeria, and Morocco, among other Middle Eastern and African countries.
Natural Gas Price Trends in Europe: Q3 2025 Overview
Caustic Soda Prices in Germany:
In Germany, Natural Gas spot prices reached USD 11.6/MMBtu in Q3 2025, mainly due to a further decrease in imports, and increasing geopolitical pressure. The Natural Gas Price Index Report shows the continued dependence on foreign suppliers in the European markets. Natural Gas Price Historical Data shows gas prices in Germany during the last two years were more volatile than usual due to shortages on the global natural gas market.
Regional Analysis: The price analysis can be expanded to include detailed natural gas price data for a wide range of European countries:
such as Germany, France, the United Kingdom, Italy, Spain, Russia, Turkey, the Netherlands, Poland, Sweden, Belgium, Austria, Ireland, Switzerland, Norway, Denmark, Romania, Finland, the Czech Republic, Portugal, and Greece, along with other European nations.
Natural Gas Price Trends Analysis in APAC: Q3 2025 Overview
Natural Gas Prices in India:
The average price for Natural Gas in India during Q3 2025 was USD 4.70/MMBtu. Market prices were stable because of Industrial and power sector demand. Import and domestic production balance were some of the factors mentioned in Natural Gas Price Index Report. Natural Gas Price Historical Data has seen its prices slowly increasing and this can be traced to India’s push towards cleaner energy and infrastructure development in the nation.
Regional Analysis: The price analysis can be extended to provide detailed natural gas price information for the following list of countries.
China, India, Indonesia, Pakistan, Bangladesh, Japan, Philippines, Vietnam, Thailand, South Korea, Malaysia, Nepal, Taiwan, Sri Lanka, Hongkong, Singapore, Australia, and New Zealand, among other Asian countries.
Latest News & Recent Developments: Natural Gas Prices Trend, Index, History & Forecast
The global natural gas market in 2025 has experienced notable price adjustments across regions, influenced by seasonal patterns, production trends, and LNG trade dynamics. After an initial softening in mid-2025, the market faces renewed volatility as demand and supply fundamentals evolve.
Regional Price Insights
• United States: Natural gas prices averaged USD 3.81/MMBtu in September 2025, easing due to mild weather, strong shale output, and high storage levels. The U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) anticipates prices stabilizing around USD 3.42/MMBtu in 2025 and rising to USD 3.94/MMBtu in 2026 as winter demand recovers.
• Europe: Prices fell to around USD 11.6/MMBtu in Germany, supported by high storage levels and improved LNG supply chains. Robust imports and reduced industrial demand kept prices subdued.
• Asia-Pacific: In China and India, moderate consumption growth and steady LNG inflows stabilized prices near USD 2.72-4.70/MMBtu in Q3 2025. Mild seasonal conditions and strategic storage releases curtailed volatility.
• Middle East & Africa: Government-controlled pricing mechanisms in Saudi Arabia (~USD 2.75/MMBtu) ensured price stability, supported by strong domestic production and policy-driven resource allocation.
• Latin America: Prices remained steady as domestic production expanded in Brazil and Argentina, while LNG imports in Chile and Mexico balanced consumption fluctuations.
Key Market Drivers
• Ample Storage & Production: Elevated storage levels in the U.S. and Europe, alongside higher LNG terminal capacity, have eased supply concerns.
• Seasonal Moderation: Mild temperatures and stable industrial consumption slowed demand rebound.
• LNG Expansion: New LNG projects, coupled with improved trade efficiency, are gradually tightening the market.
• Regulatory Support: Policies promoting energy transition and industrial decarbonization continue to shape regional pricing.
Future Outlook (2025-2026)
• The EIA forecasts Henry Hub prices to range between USD 3.4-4.0/MMBtu, rising to USD 4.1-4.3/MMBtu by 2026 as global LNG exports and demand strengthen.
• European natural gas prices (TTF) are expected to average around USD 13-14/MMBtu in 2025, influenced by import competition and renewable energy integration.
• Asian markets remain steady through 2026, with consumption recovery in power generation and industrial sectors supporting moderate increases.
The market outlook suggests a balanced but sensitive pricing environment, where weather variability, LNG trade patterns, and policy-driven transitions will determine future price direction.
Speak to An Analyst: https://www.imarcgroup.com/request?type=report&id=22409&flag=C
Key Coverage:
• Market Analysis
• Market Breakup by Region
• Demand Supply Analysis by Type
• Demand Supply Analysis by Application
• Demand Supply Analysis of Raw Materials
• Price Analysis
o Spot Prices by Major Ports
o Price Breakup
o Price Trends by Region
o Factors influencing the Price Trends
• Market Drivers, Restraints, and Opportunities
• Competitive Landscape
• Recent Developments
• Global Event Analysis
How IMARC Pricing Database Can Help
The latest IMARC Group study, Natural Gas Prices, Trend, Chart, Demand, Market Analysis, News, Historical and Forecast Data 2025 Edition, presents a detailed analysis of Natural Gas price trend, offering key insights into global Natural Gas market dynamics. This report includes comprehensive price charts, which trace historical data and highlights major shifts in the market.
The analysis delves into the factors driving these trends, including raw material costs, production fluctuations, and geopolitical influences. Moreover, the report examines Natural Gas demand, illustrating how consumer behaviour and industrial needs affect overall market dynamics. By exploring the intricate relationship between supply and demand, the prices report uncovers critical factors influencing current and future prices.
About Us:
IMARC Group is a global management consulting firm that provides a comprehensive suite of services to support market entry and expansion efforts. The company offers detailed market assessments, feasibility studies, regulatory approvals and licensing support, and pricing analysis, including spot pricing and regional price trends. Its expertise spans demand-supply analysis alongside regional insights covering Asia-Pacific, Europe, North America, Latin America, and the Middle East and Africa. IMARC also specializes in competitive landscape evaluations, profiling key market players, and conducting research into market drivers, restraints, and opportunities. IMARC’s data-driven approach helps businesses navigate complex markets with precision and confidence.
Contact Us:
IMARC Group
134 N 4th St. Brooklyn, NY 11249, USA
Email: sales[@]imarcgroup.com
Tel No:(D) +91 120 433 0800
United States: +1-201971-6302
This release was published on openPR.
The British pound has spent the entire session on Tuesday falling apart as we are now well below the 1.31 level. The 1.31 level is an area that I had mentioned over the last couple of days to show signs of support, but it didn’t. So here we find ourselves going much lower. At this point, the 1.30 level seems to be almost assured.
I believe at this juncture we’re probably even looking at the 1.2750 level before it’s all said and done. That doesn’t mean that it’s going to be easy to get there, and it doesn’t necessarily mean that we are going to get there rapidly. But I would assume that we are in a situation where traders are going to continue to look at this as a market that, anytime you see any rally showing a bit of strength or even stability, you have to look at it through the prism of a market that, at the first signs of trouble, you have to be a seller of.
With that being said, I think you have a scenario where sooner or later we do see a big flush lower, but the candlestick on Tuesday may have been something that needs to be pushed back against at least in the short term. I look at the 1.32 level as a significant resistance barrier and most certainly the 1.3268 level, where the 200-day EMA currently sits, as a major resistance barrier. For what it’s worth, we’ve done nothing but fall for the most part since the September FOMC interest rate decision.
As a result, even though people are counting on the Federal Reserve to cut rates, it looks like there’s some serious fear out there, and we just collapsed through a major support level. If you are a little bit aggressive, you could look for a move down to 1.2750, maybe 1.28, based on the measured move of the consolidation that we just absolutely fell through. I’ve got no interest in buying the British pound. It looks like traders are betting on the Bank of England cutting rates soon, and therefore, I think the pound remains under pressure.
Ready to trade the Forex GBP/USD analysis and predictions? Here are the best forex trading platforms UK to choose from.
Christopher Lewis has been trading Forex and has over 20 years experience in financial markets. Chris has been a regular contributor to Daily Forex since the early days of the site. He writes about Forex for several online publications, including FX Empire, Investing.com, and his own site, aptly named The Trader Guy. Chris favours technical analysis methods to identify his trades and likes to trade equity indices and commodities as well as Forex. He favours a longer-term trading style, and his trades often last for days or weeks.